Electoral studies: understanding some research problems
List of Authors
  • Syed Arabi Idid

Keyword
  • Agenda-setting, content analysis, democracy, electoral studies, survey, mixed-methods

Abstract
  • This paper discusses the problems researchers experience in conducting electoral research. One approach researchers use in conducting electoral studies is quantitative with the use of empirical data while another approach would be qualitative. Researchers show preference for mixed methods, incorporating both the quantitative and qualitative approaches as the research areas have become more complex. A proper method selection is required and the nature of the research problem identified. The methods used would depend on the objective of the study, the resources and the expertise available. One research area using quantitative research is Agenda Setting that used survey and content analysis. Agenda setting studies the effects of the media on public opinion to explain for political behaviour. Public opinion would require the use of survey as a form of methodology to seek what people perceive of current issues and what issues were deemed important when making voting decisions. Using scales in conducting longitudinal research would obtain a more meaningful perspective.

Reference
  • 1. Aini Maznina A. Manaf, Malia Taibi & Kamaruzzaman Abdul Manan (2017).Media agenda and public agenda: a study of issues during the 13th general election. Malaysian Journal of Communication 33(2): 13-26.
    2. Chang, P. K., Ali Salman, Kho, S. N., Mohd Rizal Mohd Yaakop, Rasaq M. Adisa, Ong C. H. (2017). The agenda setting function of English newspapers during the 13th general election. Malaysian Journal of Communication 33(2): 27-39.
    3. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
    4. Hasmah Zanuddin, Tham, J. S., Fauziah Ahmad, Badrul Redzuan Abu Hassan, Julia Wirza Mohd Zawawi, Norliana Hashim, & Muhammad Badri Ishak (2017). Burying the news for the public: agenda cutting of the Tamil newspapers and MIC candidate Facebook during the 13th general election.Malaysian Journal of Communication 33(2): 55-72.
    5. Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D. & Vogel, C. (2003). Internet research methods: A practical guide for the social and behavioural sciences. London: Sage.
    6. Idid, S. A. (1999). Analisiskandungan.Bangi: Jabatan Komunikasi, UKM.
    7. Idid, S. A. (2011). Peranan media massa dalam pilihanraya umum. Kuala Lumpur: IIUM Press. Idid, S. A. (2017). Agenda setting: Probing the issues during the 13th general election. Malaysian Journal of Communication 33(2): 1-12.
    8. Idid, S. A., & Chang, P.K. (2012).The media and public agenda among the Malay and Chinese communities during the 2008 Malaysian General Elections. Asian Social Science 8(5): 107-115.
    9. Ivankova, N. V. (2015). Mixed methods applications in action research: From methods to community action. Los Angeles: Sage.
    10. Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    11. Ornstein, N.J., Kohut, A., & McCarthy L. (1988).The people, the press and politics: Times/Mirror study of the American Electorate. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc.
    12. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press (May 15, 2012). Assessing the representativeness of public opinion surveys. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2012/05/15/assessing-the-representativeness-of-public-opinion-surveys/
    13. Ratnam, K. J. (1965). Communalism and the political process. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.
    14. Ratnam, K. J., & Milne, R. S. (1967).The Malayan parliamentary election of 1964. Singapore: University of Malaya Press.
    15. Tham Seong Chee (1981). Social science research in Malaysia. Singapore: Graham Bash.
    16. Zeti Azreen Ahmad, Ismail S.Y. Ahmed, Hartini Wakichan, Hazwani Halem, Siti Haslina Hussin, Mutiu Adekunle Ganiyu (2017). GE 13: The influence of ethnic newspapers in shaping the opinion of Indian and Chinese voters. Malaysian Journal of Communication 33(2): 40-54.