Nanotechnology education and workforce development through higher education: The case of Malaysia
List of Authors
  • Kasthoory Rajalingam

Keyword
  • Knowledge Workers, Capstone Experience

Abstract
  • This research aims to examine the main drivers of university nanotechnology programs in producing knowledge workers for the nanotechnology related job market. Three key drivers, namely multidisciplinary and complexity, hands-on training and transferability knowledge are determined in order to elicit experts' views on nanotechnology education. Ten in-depth interview sessions were conducted with middle- or high-level field experts from the various fields of nanoscience. The findings show that students stringing from an assortment of science disciplines will have an opportunity of surviving nanotechnology as the progression will be at full tilt; however, it would be challenging for management and business-oriented people to apprehend and cherish the impact of this technology. The balance between capstone experience and classroom teaching, as well as the aspects of malleability and transferability knowledge such as management and entrepreneurial skills are also important elements of university nanotechnology education. This paper ends with several key policy implications.

Reference
  • 1. Balakrishnan B, Er PH and Visvanathan P. (2013) Socio-ethical education in nanotechnology engineering programmes: A case study in Malaysia. Science and engineering ethics 19: 1341-1355.
    2. Battard N. (2012) Convergence and multidisciplinarity in nanotechnology: Laboratories as technological hubs. Technovation 32: 234-244.
    3. Bhat JS. (2005) Concerns of new technology based industries—the case of nanotechnology. Technovation 25: 457-462.
    4. Corbett J, McKeown P, Peggs G, et al. (2000) Nanotechnology: international developments and emerging products. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 49: 523-545.
    5. Fonash SJ. (2001) Education and training of the nanotechnology workforce. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 3: 79-82.
    6. Hamdan H. (2014) NanoMalaysia Programme (2011–2020): engine of growth for innovative Malaysia. Journal of Experimental Nanoscience 9: 2-8.
    7. Hang C-C, Ang M, Wong P-K, et al. (2009) Technology management educational initiatives in Asia: a case study from the National University of Singapore. Academy of Management Learning & Education 8: 444-456.
    8. Hosseini SJ and Esmaeeli S. (2010) To Determine the Challenges in Commercialization of Nanotechnology in Agricultural Sector of Iran. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 5: 448-451.
    9. Hullmann A. (2006) Who is winning the global nanorace? Nature Nanotechnology 1: 81-83.
    10. Jones MG, Blonder R, Gardner GE, et al. (2013) Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education 35: 1490-1512.
    11. Juanola-Feliu E, Colomer-Farrarons J, Miribel-Català P, et al. (2012) Market challenges facing academic research in commercializing nano-enabled implantable devices for in-vivo biomedical analysis. Technovation 32: 193-204.
    12. Lan Y-L. (2012) Development of an Attitude Scale to Assess K-12 Teachers' Attitudes toward Nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education 34: 1189-1210.
    13. Lo C-c, Wang C-h, Chien P-Y, et al. (2012) An empirical study of commercialization performance on nanoproducts. Technovation 32: 168-178.
    14. Meyyappan M. (2004) Nanotechnology education and training. Journal of Materials Education 26: 313.
    15. Miyazaki K and Islam N. (2007) Nanotechnology systems of innovation—An analysis of industry and academia research activities. Technovation 27: 661-675.
    16. Nikulainen T and Palmberg C. (2010) Transferring science-based technologies to industry—Does nanotechnology make a difference? Technovation 30: 3-11.
    17. Palmberg C. (2008) The transfer and commercialisation of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of university and company researchers. The Journal of Technology Transfer 33: 631-652.
    18. Roco M. (2002) NanotechnologyÐA frontier for engineering education. Int. J. Eng. Educ 18: 488-497.
    19. Sakhnini S and Blonder R. (2015) Essential Concepts of Nanoscale Science and Technology for High School Students Based on a Delphi Study by the Expert Community. International Journal of Science Education 37: 1699-1738.
    20. Stephan P, Black GC and Chang T. (2007) The small size of the small scale market: The early-stage labor market for highly skilled nanotechnology workers. Research Policy 36: 887-892.
    21. Thursby MC, Fuller AW and Thursby J. (2009) An integrated approach to educating professionals for careers in innovation. Academy of Management Learning & Education 8: 389-405.
    22. Uda H, Nadia E and Shahrir S. (2008) Nanotechnology development in Malaysia: current status and implementation strategy. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Research and Education 5: 53-62.
    23. Uddin M and Chowdhury AR. (2001) Integration of nanotechnology into the undergraduate engineering curriculum. International Conference on Engineering Education. Citeseer, 6-9.
    24. Vogel V and Campbell CT. (2002) Education in nanotechnology: Launching the first Ph. D. program. International Journal of Engineering Education 18: 498-505.
    25. Walsh JP and Ridge C. (2012) Knowledge production and nanotechnology: Characterizing American dissertation research, 1999–2009. Technology in Society 34: 127-137.