1. Abad-García, M. (2019). Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity. Anales de Pediatría, 90(1), 57.e1-57.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANPEDE.2018.11.006
2. Alehegn, A., & Diale, B. M. (2021). Academic staff practices and challenges of publishing. International Journal of African Higher Education, 8(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.6017/IJAHE.V8I1.13375
3. Anson, C., Hall, S., Pemberton, M., & Moskovitz, C. (2020). Reuse in STEM research writing. Aila Review, 33, 120-135. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00033.ans
4. Anthony, M. (2015). Predatory journals. Home Healthcare Now, 33(2), 65-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000186
5. Ayodele, F. O., Yao, L., & Haron, H. (2019). Promoting ethics and integrity in management academic research: Retraction initiative. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 357-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z
6. Bansal, B. (2022). Exploring the knowledge and acceptance of reputed authorship criteria: A pilot study among medical researchers in India. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.10.22276195
7. Bassi, R., Bucci, E., Calogero, R., Carninci, P., Ciliberto, G., Conte, P., Luca, M., Corbellini, G., Giordano, A., Marchionni, L., Giordano, G., Parini, A., & Sbardella, G. (2019). Look for methods, not conclusions. Cell Death & Disease, 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-2179-8
8. Betz, C. (2016). Authors beware: Open access predatory journals. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 31(3), 233-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2016.02.006
9. Brantley, S. (2022). Student-created media: Designing research, learning and skill-building experiences. Public Services Quarterly, 18, 200-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2022.2085426.
10. Burdine, L. K., de Castro Maymone, M. B., & Vashi, N. A. (2019). Text recycling: Self-plagiarism in scientific writing. International Journal of Women's Dermatology, 5(2), 134-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.10.002
11. Burger, M. C. (2020). Caught between a ghost and a gift: Navigating authorship issues. SA Orthopaedic Journal, 19(3), 122-124. http://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2020/v19n3a0
12. Cartwright, V. A. (2016). Authors beware! The rise of the predatory publisher. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 44(8), 666-668. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12836
13. Choi, H. W., Choi, Y. J., & Kim, S. (2019). Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals. Science Editing, 6(6), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.171
14. Choi, Y. J., Choi, H. W., & Kim, S. (2020). Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports. Science Editing, 7(7), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.186
15. Choudhary, M., & Kurien, N. (2019). Predatory journals: A threat to evidence-based science. Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU), 12(1), 12-14. https://doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_146_18
16. Cooke, S. J., Young, N., Donaldson, M. R., Nyboer, E. A., Roche, D. G., Madliger, C. L., Lennox, R. J., Chapman, J. M., Faulkes, Z.,& Bennett, J. R. (2021). Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing. Facets, 6(1), 1753-1770. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0103
17. Cosentino, M., Marino, F., Haldar, C., & Maestroni, G. J. (2017). Honorary authors and unwitting: Personal experience with a journal from a publisher included in the Beall’s list of predatory publishers. In I. Glendinning, T. Foltynek, & J. Rybicka (Eds.), Plagiarism across europe and beyond 2017 (pp. 15-24). European Network for Academic Integrity.
18. Craig, R., Cox, A., Tourish, D., & Thorpe, A. (2020). Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is to be done?. Research Policy, 49, 103930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103930
19. da Silva, J. A. T., Katavić, V., Dobránszki, J., Al-Khatib, A., & Bornemann-Cimenti, H. (2019). Establishing rules for ethicists and ethics organizations in academic publishing to avoid conflicts of interest, favoritism, cronyism and nepotism. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 7(1), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.75698.87
20. Dal-Ré, R., Bouter, L., Cuijpers, P., Gluud, C., & Holm, S. (2020). Should research misconduct be criminalized?. Research Ethics, 16, 1 - 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898400
21. De Maio, C., Dixon, K., & Yeo, S. (2019). Academic staff responses to student plagiarism in universities: A literature review from 1990 to 2019. Issues in Educational Research, 29(4), 1131-1142
22. Dhillon, P. (2021). How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts. The FEBS Journal, 288. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15705
23. Dohe, K., Pappas, E., & Emmelhainz, C. (2019). Delay, distract, defer: Addressing sabotage in the academic library. The Maintainers III Conference. https://doi.org/10.13016/q4rs-zis9
24. Facina, G., Cavalcante, F.P., Paulinelli, R.R., & Vieira, R.A. (2020). Plagiarism in scientific publications. Mastology, 30, e20200054. https://doi.org/10.29289/25945394202020200054
25. Fontanarosa, P. B. (2020). Types of articles. In AMA Manual of Style Committee (Eds.), AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors (11th ed.) (pp. 1-12). Oxford Academic https://doi.org/10.1093/jama/9780190246556.003.0001
26. Frandsen, T. F. (2022). Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles. Learned Publishing, 35(4), 598-604. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1489
27. Gefen, D. (2019). A post-positivist answering back: Part 2: A demo in r of the importance of enabling replication in PLS and LISREL. Data Base, 50, 12-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3353401.3353404
28. Gelman, A., & Guzey, A. (2020). Statistics as squid ink: How prominent researchers can get away with misrepresenting data. Chance, 33, 25-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2020.1754069
29. Gopalakrishna, G., Ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. PLoS ONE, 17(2), e0263023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023
30. Grech, V. (2019). Write a Scientific Paper (WASP): Academic hoax and fraud. Early Human Development, 129, 87-89 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.12.005
31. Gupta, L., Tariq, J., Yessirkepov, M., Zimba, O., Misra, D. P., Agarwal, V., & Gasparyan, A. Y. (2021). Plagiarism in non-anglophone countries: A cross-sectional survey of researchers and journal editors. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 36(39), e247. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e247
32. Hall, J., & Martin, B. (2019). Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2018.03.006
33. Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., Pratt, T. C., & Mays, R. D. (2020). The perceived causes of research misconduct among faculty members in the natural, social, and applied sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2162-2174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1593352
34. Horbach, S. S., & Halffman, W. W. (2019). The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’. Research Policy, 48(2), 492-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2017.09.004
35. Johal, J., Ward, R., Gielecki, J., Walocha, J., Natsis, K., Tubbs, R. S., & Loukas, M. (2017). Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research. Clinical Anatomy, 30(6), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22899
36. Kandil, M. (2022). Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: The endless story. Qeios. https://doi.org/10.32388/uubxg8.3
37. Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2020). The consequences of data fabrication and falsification among researchers. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 1(2), 7-10. http://doi.org/10.15722/jrpe.1.2.202009.7
38. Kendall, G. (2021). Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers. Learned Publishing, 34(3), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1374
39. Kohli, C. (2019). Plagiarism in healthcare education. International Journal of Healthcare Education & Medical Informatics, 6(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.24321/2455.9199.201901
40. Kokiwar, P. R., Gaiki, V. V., & Reddy, A. S. (2020). Prevalence and patterns of research misconduct among medical college faculties. MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences, 8(2), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-7006.301997
41. Krokoscz, M. (2021). Plagiarism in articles published in journals indexed in the Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (SPELL): A comparative analysis between 2013 and 2018. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00063-5
42. Kuleshova, A. V., Chekhovich, Y. V., & Belenkaya, O. S. (2019). Walking the razor’s edge: How to avoid self-plagiarism when you recycle your texts. Science Editor and Publisher, 4(1-2), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2019-1-2-45-51
43. Leydesdorff, L., Fyfe, A., & Wouters, P. (2021). Scholarly communication and the construction of parameters of relevance. Scientometrics, 126(1), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03709-1
44. Lin, W. Y. C. (2020). Self-plagiarism in academic journal articles: From the perspectives of international editors-in-chief in editorial and COPE case. Scientometrics, 123(1), 299-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03373-0
45. Mathew, R. P., & Patel, V. (2022). Predatory journals-The power of the predator versus the integrity of the honest. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, 51(5), 740-746. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.07.005
46. Mavrogenis, A., Quaile, A., & Scarlat, M. (2020). The good, the bad and the rude peer-review. International Orthopaedics, 44, 413-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04504-1
47. McQuarrie, F. A., Kondra, A. Z., & Lamertz, K. (2020). Do tenure and promotion policies discourage publications in predatory journals?. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 51(3), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.51.3.01
48. Meeks, S. (2020). Strong and ethical scholarly writing for multidisciplinary audiences. Innovation in Aging, 4, 858-858. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3161
49. Mehta, P., & Mukherjee, S. (2022). Plagiarism and its repercussions: A primer on responsible scientific writing. Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics, 3(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.1.05
50. Melo, L., Soto-Ardila, L. M., Luengo, R., Carvalho, J. L. (2020). Ideas about plagiarism and self-plagiarism with university professors and researchers: A case study with WebQDA. In A. Costa, L. Reis, & A. Moreira (Eds.), Computer supported qualitative research (WCQR 2019): Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 1068, pp. 206-215). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31787-4_17
51. Memon, A., & Rathore, F. (2021). The rising menace of scholarly black-market: Challenges and solutions for improving research in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 71(6), 1523-1526 .
52. Navalta, J., Stone, W., & Lyons, T. (2019). Ethical issues relating to scientific discovery in exercise science. International Journal of Exercise Science, 12(1), 1-8.
53. Nurunnabi, M., & Hossain, M. A. (2019). Data falsification and question on academic integrity. Accountability in Research, 26(2), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1564664
54. Paruzel-Czachura, M., Baran, L., & Spendel, Z. (2021). Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research. Research Ethics, 17(3), 375-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120980562
55. Poutoglidou, F., Stavrakas, M., Tsetsos, N., Poutoglidis, A., Tsentemeidou, A., Fyrmpas, G., & Karkos, P. D. (2022). Fraud and deceit in medical research: Insights and current perspectives. Voices in Bioethics, 8. https://doi.org/10.52214/vib.v8i.8940
56. Rajaram, S. (2021). Reflections on authorship. Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 19, 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00568-y
57. Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Berzofsky, M. E. (2020). Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA. Accountability in Research, 27(7), 457-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1772060
58. Saleem, H., & Iqbal, A. (2022). The scam of the research world: The predatory practices. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 26(4), 430-432. https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i4.1943.
59. Sarfraz, Z., Sarfraz, A., Anwer, A., Nadeem, Z., Bano, S., & Tareen, S. (2020). Predatory journals: A literature review. Pakistan Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 1(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.37978/pjsm.v1i1.102
60. Severin, A., & Low, N. (2019). Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases. International Journal of Public Health, 64, 1123-1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01284-3
61. Shankar, N., Selvakumar, J., Loo, J., Ohn, M., Chua, S., Dhandapani, A., Simiyon, M., & Raja, J. (2021). What can be found in the spam folder? A self-study from junior researchers in psychiatry. BJPsych Open, 7, S250-S251. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.671
62. Shin, S. (2019). Plagiarism. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 49, 59. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.59
63. Shrestha, J. (2020). Authors beware! Publishing in predatory journals is harmful. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 3(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v3i2.32293
64. Shrestha, J., Subedi, S., & Timsina, K. (2020). Predatory publishing: A threat to the credibility of science. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v3i1.30214
65. Shrestha, J., Subedi, S., Shokati, B., & Chaudhary, A. (2019). Predatory journals: A threat to scholarly publishing. Journal of Education and Research, 8(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v8i1.25482
66. Smith, E., Williams-Jones, B., Master, Z., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., Paul-Hus, A., Shi, M., & Resnik, D. B. (2020). Misconduct and misbehavior related to authorship disagreements in collaborative science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1967-1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4
67. Stein, C. (2020). Is intentional publishing in predatory journals a form of scientific misconduct?. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 13(1), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2020.V13I1.00708
68. Strinzel, M., Severin, A., Milzow, K., & Egger, M. (2019). Blacklists and whitelists to tackle predatory publishing: A cross-sectional comparison and thematic analysis. mBio, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00411-19
69. Summer-Gafford, G., Jang, H., & Scruth, E. (2019). Publication: Creating a culture where ethical practices are the norm. Clinical Nurse Specialist. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000455
70. Thomas, A. (2019). Plagiarism in South African management journals: A follow-up study. South African Journal of Science, 115(5-6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17159/SAJS.2019/5723
71. Varghese, J., & Jacob, M. (2022). Gift authorship: Look the gift horse in the mouth. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 7(3), 196-202. https://doi.org/10.20529/ijme.2022.028
72. Varghese, J., & Jacob, M. O. L. L. Y. (2022). Gift authorship: Look the gift horse in the mouth. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 7(3), 196-202. https://doi.org/10.20529/ijme.2022.028
73. Wallace, E., Hogan, M., Noone, C., & Groarke, J. (2019). Investigating components and causes of sabotage by academics using collective intelligence analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 44, 2113 - 2131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1477128
74. Wildemuth, B. (2020). The Types of publications read by finnish scholars vary with their purposes for reading. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15, 229-232. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29667
75. Woldu, M. G. (2019). Unpacking research ethical stands and practices in academic institutions: A case study of a university from Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1633776. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1633776
76. Wright, J., Avouris, A., Frost, M., & Hoffmann, S. (2022). Supporting academic freedom as a human right: Challenges and solutions in academic publishing. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26, 1741-1760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2088520
77. Yeo-Teh, N. S. L., & Tang, B. L. (2021). Wilfully submitting to and publishing in predatory journals-a covert form of research misconduct?. Biochemia Medica, 31(3), 030201. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.030201
78. Yoon, S. W., Han, H., Han, C. S. H., & Chai, D. S. (2021). The power of ethics and standards when the scholarly system fails. Human Resource Development Review, 20(2), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211006795
79. Zimba, O., & Gasparyan, A. (2021). Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia, 59, 132-137. https://doi.org/10.5114/reum.2021.105974