1. Abd-Elaal, E. S., Gamage, S. H., & Mills, J. E. (2022). Assisting academics to identify computer generated writing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(5), 725-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2046709
2. Abidah, K. H. (2023). Technology goes to classroom: Learning media application possibilities for writing. SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2023.41.141
3. Adams, C. (2019). Tinker, tailor, soldier, thief: An investigation into the role of drones in journalism. Digital Journalism, 7(5), 658-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1533789
4. Al-Abdullatif, A. M., Alsubaie, M. A., & Aldoughan, E. A. (2020). Exploring the effects of excessive texting through mobile applications on students’ technostress and academic writing skills in the Arabic language. IEEE Access, 8, 166940-166950. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024021
5. Alemu, M. (2020). The role of pre-writing strategies to enhance the students' idea generating abilities: The case of first-year computer science students of Haramaya University. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 8(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.1p.40
6. Ayele, W. Y., & Juell-Skielse, G. (2021, April). A systematic literature review about idea mining: The use of machine-driven analytics to generate ideas. In K. Arai (Ed.), Advances in information and communication. FICC 2021: Advances in intelligent systems and computing, (Vol. 1364, pp. 744-762). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73103-8_53
7. Baird, S. B., Kearney, K. S., & Nephew, A. (2020). Writing through theoretical frameworks in the doctoral classroom. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 11(3), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-02-2020-0013
8. Bazerman, C. (2019). Inscribing the world into knowledge: Data and evidence in disciplinary academic writing. In The 2023 Writing Research Across Borders VI (pp. 277-292). Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.37514/int-b.2019.0421.2.13
9. Bjørkdahl, K., & Franco Duharte, A.S. (2022). Introduction: Ending the romance of academic flying. In K. Bjørkdahl, & A. S. Franco Duharte (Eds.), Academic flying and the means of communication (pp. 1-18). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4911-0_1
10. Cañizares, J. C. M., & Rojas, J. C. (2022, March). Ideas generation and integration: A method for teamwork in a virtual environment. In I. Kallel, H. M. Kammoun & L. Hsair (Eds.), 2022 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1473-1479). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766556
11. Castelló, M. (2022). Research writing, What do we know and how to move forward. In M. Gustafsson & A. Eriksson (Eds.), Negotiating the intersections of writing and writing instruction (pp. 89-122). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/int-b.2022.1466.2.04
12. Castillo-Martínez, I. M., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2021, January). Research competencies to develop academic reading and writing: A systematic literature review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5, p. 576961). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.576961
13. Chuikova, E. S. (2021). Framework for academic writing culture development with language students. Social Sciences, 23(76), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.37313/2413-9645-2021-23-76-68-77
14. Chukwuere, J. E., & Chukwuere, P. C. (2020). Guide for Postgraduate Student Research and Publications: A Step-by-Step Approach. In P. Ngulube (Ed.), Handbook of research on connecting research methods for information science research (pp. 529-550). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1471-9.ch027
15. Dafouz, E. (2020). Undergraduate student academic writing in English-medium higher education: Explorations through the ROAD-MAPPING lens. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, 100888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100888
16. De Coster, E. (2020). Envisioning student work: Writing before research and its impact on the reference process. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102153
17. Dudnik, L. V., & Putilovskaya, T. S. (2020). Educational paradigm of academic writing. Higher Education in Russia, 29(1), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-1-88-97
18. Eriksson, D. (2023). The art and science of scholarly writing: Framing symmetry of specificity beyond IMRAD. European Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-01-2023-0004
19. Guo, H., & Laidlaw, D. H. (2018). Topic-based exploration and embedded visualizations for research idea generation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(3), 1592-1607. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2873011
20. Hayes, C. L. (2021). The research prospectus in first-year writing (and beyond): Teaching writing for transfer. Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31719/PJAW.V5I2.63
21. Jezhny, K. A., & Bapir, N. S. M. (2021). The assessment of university students knowledge on academic writing. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, 25(1), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.25.1.15
22. Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2020). Prescription and reality in advanced academic writing. Ibérica, (39), 14-42. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.39.14
23. Johnson, G. J. (2021). Getting there from here in a timely and effective manner: Editorial, volume 8, part 3. Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 8(3), i-xiii. https://doi.org/10.31273/EIRJ.V8I3.836
24. Lerma-Noriega, C. A., Flores-Palacios, M. L., & Rebolledo-Mendez, G. (2020). In A. Mikroyannidis, M. Chang & S. White (Eds.), Proceedings of the12th international conference on mobile, hybrid, and on-line learning (eLmL2020) (pp. 1-4). Spain: IARIA.
25. Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2022). Setting the stage (s) for English for research and publication purposes: Authors, audiences, and learning the craft. Ibérica, (43), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.43.13.7
26. Rabbi, S. (2020). Mapping rhetorical knowledge in advanced academic writers: The affordances of a transactional framework to disciplinary communication. Across the Disciplines, 17(3/4), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.37514/ATDJ.2020.17.3.03
27. Reddy, C. D. (2023). A framework of rhetorical moves designed to scaffold the research proposal development process. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 18, 077-097. https://doi.org/10.28945/5088
28. Roald, G. M., Wallin, P., Hybertsen, I. D., & M. Stenøien, J. (2021). Learning from contrasts: First-year students writing themselves into academic literacy. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(6), 758-770. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1813264
29. Sansom, R. (2019). “Doing research”: Understanding the different types of peer-reviewed articles. Voice and Speech Review, 13(3), 259-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268263.2019.1668102
30. Sulaiman, S. (2022). Students’ ways of understanding academic writing. Journal of General Education and Humanities, 1(4), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i4.32
31. van Broekhoven, K., Belfi, B., Hocking, I., & van der Velden, R. (2020). Fostering university students’ idea generation and idea evaluation skills with a cognitive-based creativity training. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 7(2), 284-308. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0015
32. Vijai, C., Natarajan, K., & Elayaraja, M. (2019). Citation tools and reference management software for academic writing. GIS Business, 14(6), 586-596. https://doi.org/10.26643/gis.v14i6.14788
33. Wahyuni, S. E., & Inayati, N. (2020). The problems of generating ideas faced by English language students in research proposal writing. Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 12(2), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v12i2.633
34. Weber-Wulff, D. (2019). Plagiarism detectors are a crutch, and a problem. Nature, 567(7749), 435-436. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00893-5
35. Wei, J., Carter, S., & Laurs, D. (2019). Handling the loss of innocence: First-time exchange of writing and feedback in doctoral supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1541074