Pengaruh pembelajaran abad ke-21 (PAK21) terhadap minat murid dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik: satu tijauan sistematik
List of Authors
  • Siti Mistima Maat , Sylviana Mantihal

Keyword
  • pembelajaran abad ke-21, minat, pembelajaran konvensional

Abstract
  • Pembelajaran abad ke-21 sememangnya tidak asing lagi dalam sistem pendidikan di Malaysia, namun masih kurang diaplikasikan. Kajian literatur menunjukkan bahawa strategi pengajaran yang tepat dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik mampu meningkatkan minat pelajar dalam sesi pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Namun, tinjauan menunjukkan masih ramai guru menggunakan kaedah pembelajaran konvensional. Hal ini menyebabkan murid- murid berasa bosan semasa belajar kerana proses pembelajaran yang berlaku hanya sehala. Dalam tinjauan ini, pembelajaran abad ke-21 boleh meningkatkan minat murid terhadap mata pelajaran matematik serta membantu meningkatkan kefahaman murid dalam mempelajari topik yang lebih kompleks. Artikel telah diakses dari tahun 2015 hingga 2019 melalui dua pangkalan data ERIC dan Google Scholar. Sebelum menjalankan tinjauan ini, beberapa kriteria telah ditetapkan. Daripada tinjauan ini, kebanyakan kajian mendapati bahawa terdapat hubungan yang positif antara pembelajaran abad ke-21 dengan minat pelajar dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik.

Reference
  • 1. Alismail, H. A. (2015). Integrate Digital Storytelling in Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(9), 126–129.

    2. Amat Ujali Lan, & Affero, I. (2017). Minat Pelajar dalam Subjek Matematik Sekolah Rendah Daerah Pontian. Seminar Pendidikan Johor 2016 “Pendidikan Berkualiti Dan Pembangunan Swadaya Insan,” (September 2016), 1–5.

    3. Anagün, Ş. S. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions about the relationship between 21st century skills and managing constructivist learning environments. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11452a

    4. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Laporan Trend Pendidikan Matematik dan Sains Antarabangsa (TIMSS) 2015. 1–11. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/images/Terbitan/Rujukan-Akademik/pubfile_file_002124.pdf

    5. Bray, A., & Oldham, E. (2018). Mathematics and science teaching in the contemporary classroom : perceptions of teachers and suggestions for professional development Mathematics and science teaching in the contemporary classroom : perceptions of teachers and suggestions for professional development. (July).

    6. Drake, S., & Reid, J. (2018). Integrated Curriculum as an Effective Way to Teach 21st Century Capabilities. Asia Pacific Jorunal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.30777/apjer.2018.1.1.03

    7. Fatah, A., Suryadi, D., Sabandar, J., & Turmudi. (2016). Open-ended approach: An effort in cultivating students’ mathematical creative thinking ability and self-esteem in mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 9–18.

    8. Fatimah, A. S., & Santiana, S. (2017). Teaching in 21St Century: Students-Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Use in the Classroom. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 2(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.132

    9. Gazdag, E., Nagy, K., & Szivák, J. (2019). “I Spy with My Little Eyes…” The use of video stimulated recall methodology in teacher training – The exploration of aims, goals and methodological characteristics of VSR methodology through systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 95(April), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.015

    10. Hossain, A., & Rezal, M. (2018). Integration of Structured Cooperative Learning in Mathematics Classrooms. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2018.01.004

    11. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2018. Pelaporan Pentaksiran Sekolah Rendah. Retrieved from anyflip.com/whpp/xgsi/basic.

    12. Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). <Khan et al. - 2003 - Five steps to conducting a systematic review.pdf>.

    13. Mbugua, Z., Kibet, K., Muthaa, G., & Nkonke, G. (2012). Factors Contributing To Students’ Poor Performance in Mathematics at Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education in Kenya: A Case of Baringo County, Kenya. Aijcrnet.Com, 2(6), 87–91. Retrieved from http://aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_6_June_2012/11.pdf

    14. Mohajan, H. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01591250

    15. Niemi, H., Niu, S., Vivitsou, M., & Li, B. (2018). Digital Storytelling for Twenty-First-Century

    Competencies with Math Literacy and Student Engagement in China and Finland.

    Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(4), 331–353.

    https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.470999

    16. Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2015). Research Methodology:Tools And

    Techniques. Obtenido De Research Methodology:Tools And

    Techniques: http://euacademic.org/BookUpload/9.pdf

    17. Ponniah, et. a. (2019). Implementation of the 21st century learning in learning and facilitation of Thirukural in Tamil primary schools. International Journal of Advanced And Applied Sciences, 6(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.01.006

    18. Roth McDuffie, A., Choppin, J., Drake, C., & Davis, J. (2018). Middle school mathematics teachers’ orientations and noticing of features of mathematics curriculum materials. International Journal of Educational Research, 92(September), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.019

    19. Rusdin, N. M. (2018). Teachers’ Readiness in Implementing 21st Century Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1293–1306. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i4/4270

    20. Sanabria, J. C., & Arámburo-Lizárraga, J. (2017). Enhancing 21st century skills with AR: Using the gradual immersion method to develop collaborative creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00627a

    21. Saracho, O. (2012). Creativity theories and related teachers’ beliefs. Early Child Development and Care, 182(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2010.535899

    22. Sipayung, H. D., Sani, R. A., & Bunawan, W. (2018). Collaborative Inquiry For 4C Skills. 200(Aisteel), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.95

    23. Stoica, A. (2015). Using Math Projects in Teaching and Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(November 2014), 702–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.181

    24. Tican, C., & Deniz, S. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ opinions about the use of 21st century learner and 21st century teacher skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.181

    25. Toh, T. L., Cheng, L. P., Ho, S. Y., Jiang, H., & Lim, K. M. (2017). Use of comics to enhance students’ learning for the development of the 21st century competencies in the

    mathematics classroom. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 437-452.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2017.1339344

    26. Ucus, S. (2015). Elementary School Teachers’ Views on Game-based Learning as a Teaching Method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.216

    27. Viro, E., & Joutsenlahti, J. (2018). The starT project competition from the perspective of mathematics and academic literacy. Education Sciences, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020067

    28. Warner, S., & Kaur, A. (2017). The Perceptions of Teachers and Students on a 21 st Century Mathematics Instructional Model. International electronic journal of mathematics education e-issn:, 12(2), 193–215.

    29. Yusoff, W. M. W., Hashim, R., Khalid, M., Hussien, S., & Kamalludeen, R. (2018). The Impact of Hikmah (Wisdom) Pedagogy on 21st Century Skills of Selected Primary and Secondary School Students in Gombak District Selangor Malaysia. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 100. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n6p100