Chevron signs visibility and its performance evaluation
List of Authors
  • Nora Sheda Mohd Zulkiffli , NorAznirahani Mhd Yunin1

Keyword
  • enhanced road sign, visibility, curve road

Abstract
  • Enhanced road signs are essential for night-time driving and are made possible by the intervention of new sheeting materials with increased visibility features. Over the years, the Type XI Reflective Sheeting (Wide Angle Prismatic) was introduced and implemented with the aim to improve the visibility of road signs to drivers. However, even though visibility is said to be essential for night-time driving, previous studies have shown that visibility improvement may led to changes in road user behaviour. Thus, this study was initiated to evaluate driver’s reaction, in terms of speed and braking distance, towards chevron signs with different levels of visibility. This study was conducted on a curved road section in Port Dickson and adopted the before-and-after study method while taking into consideration of the daytime and night-time effect. Findings from this study revealed that chevron signs with higher level of visibility allowed drivers to identify the road signs at a far up distance, resulting in longer braking distance and higher driving speed. Thus, it is concluded that further understanding on the effect of visibility towards drivers is required in order to produce designs that will perform best at all the time.

Reference
  • 1. Milton, J., & Mannering, F. (1998). The relationship among highway geometrics, traffic-related elements and motor-vehicle accident frequencies. Transportation, 25(4), 395-413.

    2. Garber, N.J., Hoel, L.A., 2002. Traffic and Highway Engineering. The Wadsworth Group, Pacific Grove.

    3. Royal Malaysian Police (2015-2019). Laporan Perangkaan Kemalangan Jalan Raya Malaysia, Jabatan Siasatan dan Penguatkuasaan Trafik, Bukit Aman, Polis Di Raja Malaysia 2015 – 2019.

    4. Shabadin, A., Jamil, H. M., Johari, N. M., Allyana, S., Mohamed, S., Ishak, S. Z., & Voon, W. S. (2017). Identifying the Contributing Road Engineering Factors of Crashes at Curved Road Sections in Negeri Sembilan Identifying the Contributing Road Engineering Factors of Crashes at Curved Road Sections in Negeri Sembilan.

    5. Comte, S. L., & Jamson, A. H. (2000). Traditional and innovative speed-reducing measures for curves: an investigation of driver behaviour using a driving simulator. Safety Science, 36(3), 137-150.

    6. Re, J. M., Hawkins Jr, H. G., & Chrysler, S. T. (2010). Assessing benefits of chevrons with full retro-reflective signposts on rural horizontal curves. Transportation research record, 2149(1), 30-36.

    7. Woltman, H. L. (1991). Retroreflective Sign Having Improved Legibility. (19). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.(73)

    8. Su, W., & LI, D. (2009). Retroreflectivity and Night Visibility of Road Traffic Signs [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 26(2), 114–119.

    9. King, A. (2010, March). Advances in retroreflective technologies for road signage, vehicle visibility and pavement markings: Delivering safer roads for all. In AUSTRALIAN ROAD ENGINEERING AND MAINTENANCE CONFERENCE, 5TH, 2010, MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA.

    10. 3M Traffic Safety and Security Division, 2015. Powerpoint slide presentation: Traffic Sign as per JKR requirements.

    11. Niessner, C. W. (1983). Post Mounted Delineators (No. FHWA-TX-83-208).

    12. Jennings, B. E., & Demetsky, M. J. (1983). Evaluation of curve delineation signs on rural highways (No. FHWA/VA-84/16). Virginia Transportation Research Council.

    13. Zador, P., Hs, S., Wright, P., & Hall, J. (1987). Effects of Chevrons, Post-Mounted Delineators, and Raised Pavement Markers on Driver Behavior At Roadway Curves. Transportation Research Record, (1114), 1–10.

    14. Australia Transport Roads & Traffic Authority. (2011). Speeding - Did you know? 11–14. Retrieved from www.rta.nsw.gov.au

    15. SWOV. (2012). Fact Sheet: The relation between speed and crashes.

    16. Johnston, I. R. (1983). The effects of roadway delineation on curve negotiation by both sober and drinking drivers (No. ARR128 Monograph).

    17. Ranney, T. A. (2008). Driver distraction: A review of the current state-of-knowledge.

    18. World Health Organization. (2011). Mobile phone use: a growing problem of driver distraction.

    19. Charlton, S. G. (2007). The role of attention in horizontal curves: A comparison of advance warning, delineation, and road marking treatments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(5), 873-885.

    20. Donald, D., 1997. Be Warned! A Review of Curve Warning Signs and Curve Advisory Speeds (Research Report No. ARR 304). ARRB Transport Research Ltd., Victoria, Australia.

    21. Jørgensen, F., & Wentzel-Larsen, T. (1999). Optimal use of warning signs in traffic. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 31(6), 729-738.

    22. Zhao, X., Wu, Y., Rong, J., & Ma, J. (2015). The effect of chevron alignment signs on driver performance on horizontal curves with different roadway geometries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 75, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.004

    23. Krull, K. A. (2000). The Effect of Fluorescent Yellow Warning Signs at Hazardous Locations.

    24. Wilde, G. J. (1982). The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health. Risk analysis, 2(4), 209-225.

    25. Wilde, G. J. (1998). Risk homeostasis theory: an overview. Injury prevention, 4(2), 89-91.

    26. Assum, T., Bjørnskau, T., Fosser, S., & Sagberg, F. (1999). Risk compensation—the case of road lighting. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 31(5), 545-553.

    27. Janssen, W. (1994). Seat-belt wearing and driving behavior: an instrumented-vehicle study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 26(2), 249-261.