Issues and challenges in sustaining community-based societies
List of Authors
  • Haliza Mohd Zahari1 , Mohd Muhaimin

Keyword
  • Community, Leadership in Society, Volunteerism, Focus Group Discussion, Community-Based Society

Abstract
  • Community-Based Societies (CBS) serve multiple roles in community development, such as addressing local concerns, fulfilling communal requirements, and enhancing the overall welfare of the community. The CBS serve as a means of assisting the government in addressing societal problems and fulfilling the needs of particular population groups. The establishment of societies enables the execution of initiatives designed to tackle the difficulties encountered by the specific group, while also promoting improved cooperation between the community and the society. However, there is a growing trend of societies inactivity and dissolution inside numerous establishments. Hence, this study was conducted to address the concerns and obstacles encountered by the societies in sustaining their operational vitality. The present study employs a qualitative research methodology. A total of 17 individual participated in two Focus Group Discussion sessions. The results obtained from thematic analysis using Atlas.Ti were categorized into three distinct themes: ‘the availability of financial resources prerequisite for the implementation of community program’, ‘requires dedication and participation more appropriate for volunteering’ and ‘leadership and personal qualities’. The study's findings indicate that the society plays a crucial role in enhancing community well-being. Nevertheless, it is crucial to address internal issues related to the organization of society expeditiously.

Reference
  • 1. Cécile, E., Calvard, T. S., & Pierce, M. E. (2016). Leadership as an Emergent Group Process: A Social Network Study of Personality, Leadership, and Followership ABSTRACT. 1–23. 2. Civera, C., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). Stakeholder Relationships and Responsibilities: A New Perspective. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 40–58. https://doi.org/10.4468/2019.1.04civera.freeman 3. Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2007). Emotional Dimensions of Social Movements. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 413–432). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch18 4. Kasmel, A., & Andersen, P. T. (2011). Measurement of community empowerment in three community programs in Rapla (Estonia). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(3), 799–817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8030799 5. Khair, N. K. M., Lee, K. E., & Mokhtar, M. (2020). Sustainable city and community empowerment through the implementation of community-based monitoring: A conceptual approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229583 6. Laverack, G., & Wallerstein, N. (2001). Measuring community empowerment: A fresh look at organizational domains. Health Promotion International, 16(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/16.2.179 7. Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860 8. Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & Colle, S. De. (2011). Stakeholder Theory : The State of the Art. Management, 936836193, 403–445. 9. Rolfe, S. (2016). Divergence in Community Participation Policy: Analysing Localism and Community Empowerment Using a Theory of Change Approach. Local Government Studies, 42(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2015.1081848 10. Usadolo, S. E., & Caldwel, M. (2016). A Stakeholder Approach to Community Participation in a Rural Development Project. SAGE Open, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016638132 11. Uzelac, G. (2021). Charisma and Communities of Feeling. Nations and Nationalism, 27(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12658 12. van Eeuwijk, P., & Angehrn, Z. (2017). How to … Conduct a Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Methodological Manual. University of Zurich ZORA, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-150640