Impak pelaksanaan strategi pembelajaran regulasi metakognitif dalam pembelajaran matematik: satu kajian literatur
List of Authors
  • Mohamad Ariffin Abu Bakar , Norulhuda Ismail

Keyword
  • metakognitif, regulasi metakognitif, strategi pembelajaran metakognitif, pembelajaran matematik, penyelesaian masalah

Abstract
  • Regulasi metakognitif sangat signifikan terhadap kemahiran berfikir. Bersesuaian dengan kemahiran merancang, memantau dan menilai sebagai komponen utama dalam regulasi metakognitif, ia dilihat mampu meningkatkan kemahiran berfikir pelajar terutama dalam pembelajaran matematik. Tahap penguasaan matematik yang rendah merupakan isu dalam pembelajaran matematik. Antara faktor yang mempengaruhi penguasaan pelajar adalah keupayaan berfikir dan kebolehan menyelesaiakan masalah matematik. Bagi meningkatkan kemahiran berfikir dan kemahiran menyelesaikan masalah matematik adalah melalui strategi pembelajaran yang mengutamakan pengaturan kendiri terhadap proses dan tindakan berfikir. Salah satu cadangan adalah melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Regulasi Metakognitif (SPRM). Literatur secara sistematik ini bertujuan untuk melihat pelaksanaan SPRM dan menilai impak kepada kemahiran berfikir dan penyelesaian masalah pelajar bagi mengurangkan masalah penguasaan matematik yang masih berada di tahap rendah. Strategi ini sangat relevan dan signifikan dengan kemahiran berfikir dan kebolehan menyelesaikan masalah matematik pelajar. Oleh itu, guru matematik disarankan melaksanakan strategi ini sebagai salah satu intervensi kepada masalah pembelajaran matematik di sekolah.

Reference
  • 1. Acar,F. & Ader,E. (2017). Metacognition Used by Tutors during Peer Tutoring Sessions in Mathematics. Elementary Education Online, 2017; 16(3): 1185-1200.

    2. Adnan & Arsad Bahri (2018). Beyond Effective Teaching: Enhancing Students’ Metacognitive Skill Through Guided Inquiry. IOP Publishing .Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 954 (2018) 012022 doi :10.1088/1742-6596/954/1/012022.

    3. Chin Kin Eng, Denis Lajium & Vincent Pang (2017).Kemahiran Metakognitif Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik. Jurnal Kinabalu, C7 p109-124

    4. Cera,R.,Mancini,M.& Antonietti,A.(2013).Relationship Between Metacognition,Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Learning.ECPS-Journal-7/2013. doi:10.7358/ecps-2013-007-cera.

    5. Du Toit,S.D. & Du Toit,G.F. (2013).Learner metacognition and mathematics achievement during problem-solving in a mathematics classroom .TD The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 9(3), Special edition, December 2013, pp. 505-518.

    6. Do Toit,S.D. & Kotze (2009).Metacognitive Strategies in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics.Pythagoras Journal, 70, 57-67

    7. Farah Aida Sanip & Che Nidzam Che Ahmad (2014). Kesedaran Strategi Metakognitif dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Biologi .Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan (KPM) Jilid 15, 2014.

    8. Halim, Syarifah & Hilmi (2017). Metacognitive Skills Of Malaysian Students In Non-Routine Mathematical Problem Solving. Bolema, Rio Claro (SP), v. 31, n. 57, p. 310 - 322, abr. 2017

    9. Hasbullah (2015). The Effect Of Ideal Metacognitif Strategy on Achievement In Mathematic. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology.6[4] 2015; 42-45. DOI: 10.15515/ijert.0976-4089.6.4.4245

    10. Herlina Ahmad, Febryanti, Fatimah & Muthmainnah (2018). Description of Student’s Metacognitive Ability in Understanding and Solving Mathematics Problem. 4th International Conference on Operational Research (InteriOR) IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 300 (2018) 012048 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/300/1/012048.

    11. Ihdi Amin & Sukestiyarno, Y.L. (2015). Analysis Metacognitive Skills On Learning Mathematics In High School. International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2015.

    12. Kyairaniah Abu Hassan, Mohd Isa Hamzah & Maimun Aqsha Lubis (2017). Tahap Kemahiran Metakognitif Murid Sekolah Menengah Di Kawasan Felda Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Islam. ASEAN Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilization (ACER-J) Volume 1(1) January 2017, 94-106.

    13. Menz,P. & Cindy Xin (2016).Making Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge Visible through Reflective Writing in a Mathematics-for-Teachers Course. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, Vol. IX. Simon Fraser University.

    14. Mohammad Hassan Behzadi, Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Nasrin Mahboudi (2014). The Study of Teaching Effective Strategies on Student's Math Achievements. Mathematics Education Trends and Research Volume 2014, Year 2014 Article ID metr-00040, 8 Pages doi:10.5899/2014/metr-00040 http://www.ispacs.com/journals/metr/2014/metr-00040/

    15. Moos,D.C. & Ringdal,A.(2012). Self-Regulated Learning in the Classroom: A Literature Review on the Teacher’s Role. Education Research International.Volume 2012, Article ID 423284, 15 pages.Doi:10.1155/2012/423284.

    16. Nik Azis Nik Pa (1999).Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Radikal Dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.Kuala Lumpur.

    17. Ni Wayan Listiani, I Wayan Wiarta & I Wayan Darsana(2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Metakognitif Berbasis Masalah Terbuka Berpengaruh Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V Sd Gugus 8 BlahbatuhL. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha,Jurusan PGSD (Vol: 2 No: 1 Tahun 2014)

    18. Noor Hidayah binti Ibrahim & Zanaton H.Iksan (2017). Strategi Metakognitif dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Dalam Proses Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Simposium Pendidikan diPeribadikan: Perspektif Risalah An-Nur (SPRiN2017).

    19. Nurulhuda Md Hassan & Saemah Rahman (2017). Problem Solving Skills , Metacognitive Awareness,and Mathematics Achievement: A Mediation Model. The New Educational Review. DOI:10.15804/tner.2017.49.3.16

    20. Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995) . Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology Papers and Publications. 40. Online :http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/edpsychpapers/40

    21. Smith, M.J. (2013). An exploration of metacognition and its effect on mathematical performance in differential equations. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 13, No. 1, February 2013, pp. 100 – 111.

    22. Smith, J.M & Mancy,R. (2018) Exploring the relationship between metacognitive and collaborative talk during group mathematical problem-solving – what do we mean by collaborative metacognition?, Research in Mathematics Education, 20:1, 14-36, DOI:10.1080/14794802.2017.1410215.

    23. Stephanou, G., & Mpiontini, M. (2017). Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Regulation in Self-Regulatory Learning Style, and in Its Effects on Performance Expectation and Subsequent Performance across Diverse School Subjects. Psychology, 8, 1941-1975.https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.812125.

    24. Su, H.F., Ricci, F.A., & Mnatsakanian, M. (2016). Mathematical teaching strategies: Pathways to critical thinking and metacognition. Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2 (1), 190-200.

    25. Tony Karnain, Md Nor Bakar, Seyed Yaser Mousavi Siamakani, Hossein Mohammadikia, & Muhammad Candra (2014). Exploring the Metacognitive Skills of Secondary School Students’ Use During Problem Posing. Jurnal Teknologi (Social Sciences) 67:1 (2014), 27–32

    26. Van Der Stel,M., Veenman,M.V.J., Deelen,K. & Haenen,J.(2010).The increasing role of metacognitive skills in math : A cross-sectional study from a developmental perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education. Springer. 42:219-229. Doi: 10.1007/s11858-009-0224-2

    27. Van Der Walt,M.S., Maree,J.G. & Ellis,S.M. (2008). Metacognition in the Learning of Mathematics in the Senior Phase: Some Implications for the Curriculum. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 14:3, 205-235.