University leadership and academic neutrality in Malaysian Academia
List of Authors
  • Mohd Nazim Ganti Shaari

Keyword
  • academic neutrality, academia, freedom

Abstract
  • In Malaysia, various legal and administrative instruments have been passed to ensure academic neutrality in universities. While this directive maintains a veneer of neutrality on the surface, it does not address the importance of neutrality and impartiality that a university lecturer, and the university itself, must possess. As the law stands today, there is a need to clarify this issue in ascertaining the degree of a lecturer’s neutrality since this involves public law concepts and human rights concerns. This issue is particularly germane in Malaysian academia since a mere whiff of an academic discussion regarding law and governance could be possible frowned at as an “anti-government” activity. Since the mechanics of “neutrality” transcends legal provisions, this paper utilises the doctrinal legal research methodology in examining the legal and constitutional background of this concept in light of the social theory concepts of power and hegemony, focusing on the works of James C Scott and Mannheim. The aim of this paper is to question the conventional comprehension which might be held by the university management regarding neutrality in academia.

Reference
  • 1. Andreeta S, Kolloch A(2022). Politicised Bureucrats: Conflicting Loyalties, Professionalism and the Lawin the Making of Public Services. International Journal of Law in Context 18, 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552322000246

    2. J.M.Balkin, 1993, “Understanding legal understanding : the legal subject and the problem of legal coherence”, Yale Law Journal, Vol.103: 105-176. DOI (https://doi.org/10.2307/797078

    3. J. Peter Byrne, Academic Freedom and Political Neutrality in Law Schools: An Essay on Structure and Ideology in Professional Education, 43 J. Legal Educ. 315 (1993)

    4. Peggy Davies Cooper, “Post Colonial Constitutionalism”, 44 N.Y.U. Review of Law & Social Change 1 (2019), 1-12

    5. John Aubrey Douglas, “Neo Nationalism and Universities”, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2021

    6. Chandra Muzaffar, “Protector? : An Analysis of the Concept and Practice of Loyalty in Leader-Led Relationships Within Malay Society”, SIRD, Petaling Jaya, 2020

    7. Frantz Fannon, “The Wretched of the Earth “, Grove Press, New York, 2004

    8. Hasbollah Mat Saad & Ramalinggam Rajamanickam. (2022). Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan undang-undang spesifik yang berkaitan dengan pendidikan di Malaysia serta hubungannya dengan kebebasan ahli akademik. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 34(2), 225-260. http://doi.org. 10.37052/ kanun.34(2)no3

    9. Hutchinson, Terry & Duncan, Nigel. (2012). Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law Review. 17. 83-119. 10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70.

    10. Tarunabh Khaitan, “On scholactivism in constitutional studies: Skeptical thoughts”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2022;, moac039, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac039

    11. Lai Suat Yan, “Reforming Higher Education in Malaysia : combating entrenched patronage and racial politics”, https://www.newmandala.org/ph-education-reform/ (last accessed on 13 September 2022)

    12. Lee Hwok Aun, “Autonomy and Academic Freedom” in “Quality, Equity, Autonomy :Malaysia’s Education Reforms Examined”, ISEAS, Singapore, 2019, https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/TRS13_19.pdf (last accessed on 13 September 2022)

    13. Lee Kuan Yew, “Academic Freedom and Social Responsibility”, 1966, LKY/1966/LKYl124A.DOC

    14. Roy Lee, “Upgrading Democracy : Soft Laws and the Ombudsman”, Policy IDEAS No.37, 2017, https://www.ideas.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/PI37-Upgrading-Democracy-Soft-Laws-and-The-Ombudsman.pdf(last accessed on 14 September 2022)

    15. Shaharudin Maaruf, “Concept of AHero in Malay Society”, SIRD, Ptaling Jaya, 2014

    16. Mahathir Muhammad, “The Malay Dilemma”, Marshall Cavendish Edition, 2008

    17. Karl Mannheim, “Ideology and Utopia : An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge”, Routledge, Great Britain, 1991

    18. Syed Hussein Alattas, “Intellectuals in Developing Societies”, Frank Cass, London, 1977

    19. Shaharuddin Maaruf, “Religion and Utopian ThinkingAmong the Muslims of Southeast Asia”, in Chapter 16, “Local and Global: Social Transformation in Southeast Asia”, eds. Vineeta Sinha et al, Brill, Leiden, 2005

    20. MP Jain’s “Administrative Law of Malaysia” , LexisNexis, Malaysia, 2020

    21. Sheridan and Groves’ “The Constitution of Malaysia”, MLJ Publication, 5th edition

    22. James C Scott, “Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance”, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1985

    23. James C Scott, “Domination and the Arts of Resistance”, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1990

    24. Sinnadurai, V. (1981). Public Policy Under The Contracts Act 1950. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 8(1 and 2), 1–20. Retrieved from https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JMCL/article/view/15254

    25. Syed Hussein Alattas, “The Myth of the Lazy Native”, Routledge, New York, 2006

    26. Stone, Adrienne: A Defence of Scholactivism, VerfBlog, 2022/8/22, https://verfassungsblog.de/a-defence-of-scholactivism/, DOI: 10.17176/20220822-181930-0.

    27. Brian Z. Tamanaha, “Law as a Means to an End : Threat to the Rule of Law”, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009

    28. Wan Chang Da, Wan, C.D. 2019. The Universities and University Colleges Act in Malaysia: History, contexts and development. Kajian Malaysia 37(2): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21315km2019.37.2.1

    Case law

    1. Alma Nudo Atenza v PP and Another Appeal [2019] 4 MLJ 1

    2. CTEB and Another v Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran Negara Malaysia & Ors [2021] 4 MLJ 236

    3. Datuk Ong Kee Hui v Sinyium Anak Mutit [1983] MLJ 36

    4. Dhinesh a/l Tanaphil v Lembaga Pencegahan Jenayah & Ors [2022] 3 MLJ 356

    5. Lee Kwan Woh v Public Prosecutor [2009] 1 LNS 778

    6. Letitia Bosman v Public Prosecutor & Other Appeals (no.1) [2020] 5 MLJ 277

    7. Lim Lian Geok v The Minister of Interior, Federation of Malaya [1962] 1 MLJ 159

    8. Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan v Victoria Jayaselee Martin and Another [2016] 4 CLJ 12

    9. Muhammad Hilman Bin Idham & Ors v Kerajaan Malaysia & Ors [2011] 9 CLJ 50

    10. Nazrul Imran Bin Mohd Nor v Civil Service Commision Malaysia and Anor [2021] 6 MLJ 750

    11. Nivesh Nair a/l Mohan v Dato Abdul Razak Bin Musa and Others Criminal Appeal No.: 05(HC)-7-01/2020(W)

    12. Pengarah Pelajaran Wilayah Persekutuan v Loot Ting Yee [1982] 1 MLJ 68

    13. Pihak Berkuasa Negeri Sabah v Sugumar Balakrishnan [2002] 3 MLJ 72

    14. PP v Azmi Sharom [2015] 8 CLJ 921 Public Prosecutor v Ooi Kee Saik & Ors [1971] 2 MLJ 108

    15. Public Prosecutor v Ooi Kee Saik & Ors [1971] 2 MLJ 108

    16. Shamim Reza v Public Prosecutor [2011] 1 MLJ 471

    17. Sivarasa Rasiah v Badan Peguam Malaysia [2010] 2 MLJ 333

    18. Tan Tek Seng v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan and Anor [1996] 1 MLJ 261

    Special Reports

    1. Report of the Committee on the Political Activities of Civil Servants, June 1949, http://hdl.handle.net/10973/35603

    Reid Commission Report 1957

    2. Hansard

    https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-10072000.pdf

    https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-17062002.pdf

    3. Statutes and Regulations

    Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136)

    Statutory Bodies Disciplinary Regulations, under the Statutory Bodies (Discipline and Surcharge) Act 2000 (Act 605

    Websites

    1. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/530917,

    2. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/579659