Promoting sustainable timber harvesting through National Forestry Act 1984
List of Authors
  • Muhammad Nur Haniff Mohd Noor , Suriyani Muhamad

Keyword
  • National Forestry Act 1984, illegal logging; forest offence, environmental law, environmental sustainability

Abstract
  • This study explored respondents’ perceptions regarding the adequacy of heavy, moderate and light punishment associated with offences under the National Forestry Act 1984 (Act 313) as the primary forestry law enforced in Peninsular Malaysia. It also examined the role of supervision and inspection in controlling illegal logging and forest offences as well as the adequacy of law provisions concerning inspections in logging area, in transit and in manufacturing premises. Questionnaires were distributed to seek responses from related stakeholders of forestry enforcement agencies. The output of data analysis indicated that an effective law should carry adequate sanctions in order to have the deterrence effect, scare prospective offenders and discourage repeated commission of the convicted offences. The outcomes of the survey revealed that as a whole, Act 313 was effective to control illegal logging. In the context of punishment, heavy punishment associated with serious offences was rated as effective compared to moderate and light punishment. Findings on specific aspects of legal provisions as identified in this study may provide awareness for relevant agencies for revisiting policies towards achieving sustainable timber harvesting.

Reference
  • 1. Behrens,C. (2018). Strategic Learning Ideologies in Prison Education Programs. IGI Global.

    2. Becker, G., & C. Mulligan, (1997). The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 729-758.

    3. Bosselmann, K. (2010). Losing the forest for the trees: environmental reductionism in the law. Sustainability, 2, 2424-2448.

    4. Billiet, C., & Rousseau, S. (2014). How real is the threat of imprisonment for environmental crime?. European Journal of Law and Economics, 37(2), 183–198.

    5. Cohen, M. A. (1992). Environmental Crime and Punishment: Legal/ Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence on Enforcement of Federal Environmental Statutes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(4).

    6. Dernbach, J. C., & Mintz, J. A. (2011). Environmental Laws and Sustainability: An Introduction. Sustainability, 3, 531-540.

    7. Estrada-Carmona, N., Hart, A. K., DeClerck, F. A., Harvey, C. A., & Milder, J. C.(2014). Integrated landscape management for agriculture, rural livelihoods, and ecosystem conservation: an assessment of experience from Latin America and the Caribbean, Landscape Urban Plan, 129, 1-11.

    8. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia (FDPM) (2010). Forestry Statistics Peninsular Malaysia 2009. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    9. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia (FDPM) (2016). Forest Offence. https://www.forestry. gov.my/index.php/en/2016-06-07-02-31-39/2016-06-07-02-35-17/forest-offence

    10. Glaeser, E. L. (1999). An Overview of Crime and Punishment by. Harvard University and NBER.

    11. Haore, A. (2015). Tackling Illegal Logging and the Related Trade. What Progress and Where Next. Chatham House Report. Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    12. Heiman, G. W. (2014). Basic Statistics for the Behavioral Science (7th ed.). Wadsworth. Cengage Learning.

    13. Kadir, R., & Muhamad, S. (2012). Insider Trading in Malaysia; Sanctions and Enforcement. Advances in Natural and Applied Science, 904-908.

    14. Kamaruzaman, J., & Dahlan, T. (2008). Sustainable Forest Management Practices and Environmental Protection in Malaysia. Wseas Transactions On Environment And Development.

    15. Manual Perhutanan (2003). Jabatan Perhutanan Semenanjung Malaysia. Ampang Press Sdn Bhd

    16. MacDicken, K.G., Sola, P., Hall, J. E., Sabogal, C., Tadoum., & Weisseige. C. (2015). Global progress towards sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 352, 47–56.

    17. Reynolds, K. M., Johnson, K., & Gordon, S. N. (2003). The science/policy interface in logic based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability. Forest Policy and Economics, 5(4), 433–446.

    18. Rosseau, S., & Telle, K. (2010). On the existence of the optimal fine for environmental crime. Internationals Review of Law and Economics, 30, 329–337.

    19. Sharma, J. K. (2007). Business Statistics (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

    20. Sayer, J. A., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A. K., Sunderland, T., Langston, J. D., Reed, J., Riggs, R., Buck, L. E., Campbell, B. M., Kusters, K., Elliott, C., Minang, P. A., Dale, A., Purnomo, H., Stevenson, J. R., Gunarso, P., & Purnomo, A., (2017). Measuring the effectiveness of landscape approaches to conservation and development. Sustainability Science, 12(3).

    21. World Bank. (2006). Strengthening Forest Law Enforcement and Governance: Addressing a Systematic Constraint to Sustainable Development.

    22. Yamada, Y. (2018). Can a regional-level forest management policy achieve sustainable forest management?. Forest Policy and Economics, 90, 82–89.