The validity and power of proof of electronic signatures that have not been certified in Indonesian law
List of Authors
  • Intan Permata Ningrum , Siti Nurul Intan Sari Dalimunthe

Keyword
  • Validity, Electronic Signature, Uncertified, Proof Law

Abstract
  • In Article 60 paragraph (2) of government regulations mention there are two types of Electronic Signatures, namely Electronic Signatures that are certified and have not been certified. Electronic signatures that have been certified are legal in force and have legal consequences. The reasons of writing this scientific research is to find out whether an electronic signature that has not been certified can be used and legally valid and how it stands before the law. The research methods used in this research are juridical-normative with a statue approach and juridical-qualitative analysis. The results of this study state that electronic signatures that have not been certified can be used and recognized by law as contained in Article 54 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation No. 82 of 2012. The strength of proofing an uncertified electronic signature is relatively weak because it does not have a safeguard that detects changes as well as a certified electronic signature.

Reference
  • 1. Agustina, Meria, (2020). Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Antar Online Shop Dalam Kondisi Covid-19 Terhadap Kebijakan Yang Dikeluarkan Oleh Presiden, Res Judicata, Volume 3

    2. Andalan, Affan Muhammad, (2019). “Kedudukan Tanda Tangan Elektronik Dalam Transaksi Teknologi Finansial,” Jurist-Diction Vol 2 No. 6, 1931-1950

    3. Dermawan, Rizki, (2021). Pemanfaatan Tanda Tangan Elektronik Tersertifikasi di Era Pandemi, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, Rewang Rencang, Vol 2 No 8

    4. Fayza, Amirudin, Firman dkk, (2021). Upaya Hukum Terhadap Keamanan Data Pribadi Korban Pinjaman Online, Proceeding of Conference on Law and Social Studies, Universitas PGRI Madiun, 3

    5. Government Regulation No. 71 of 2019 implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions.

    6. Government Regulation No. 80 of 2019 on Trading Through Electronic Systems.

    7. Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions.

    8. Hari, dan Denny Prasetyo, (2021). “Tanda Tangan Elektronik pada Transaksi Jual Beli Online: Suatu Kajian Hukum Keamanan Data Konsumen di Indonesia”, Jurnal Wajah Hukum Vol 5 No 1

    9. Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions.

    10. Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions.

    11. LBH Perjuangan, (2010). Penegakan Hukum Yang Menjamin Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum Dan Kemanfaatan (Studi Kasus: Kasus Mbah Minah), Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Perjuangan

    12. Mertokusumo, Sudikno, (1999). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty

    13. Ministry of Communication and Informatics, (2021). Tanda Tangan Elektronik Menjadi Solusi Di Era Digital, Direktorat Jenderal Aplikasi Informatika

    14. Partodihardjo, Soemarno, (2009). Tanya Jawab Sekitar Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik, Jakarta: Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama

    15. Quarni, Hamalatul, (2018). Tanda Tangan Elektronik Keabsahan Dan Pembuktiannya Di Hadapan Pengadilan, Available at: www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5b6b977f75137/tanda-tangan-elektronik--keabsahan-dan-pembuktiannya-di-hadapan-pengadilan

    16. Rawls, John, (2006). A Theory of Justice”, London: Oxford University press, yang sudah diterjemahkan dalam bahasa indonesia oleh Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo - Teori Keadilan, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

    17. Rahardjo, Satjipto, (2003). Sisi ¬sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas

    18. Subekti, R, (1979). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: PT.Intermesa.