Solvency regime – A critical element of the legal framework in Sri Lanka
List of Authors
  • W. Indira Nanayakkara

Keyword
  • Solvency test, capital maintenance, corporate failures

Abstract
  • The Solvency Test, which was established in Sri Lanka by the Companies Act No.7 of 2007, requires companies to satisfy the “cash flow test” (trading solvency) and the “assets test” (balance sheet solvency - that the assets of a company must be greater than its liabilities) in order to be deemed solvent. The test plays an important role in the management of companies and presents challenges to the board of directors of a company as to how a company enhances its solvency position. During last few decades, Sri Lanka witnessed cases of corporate failures, especially in finance companies. The economic impact of such failures would only reverse the development of any country affected by such. In the present social context, a company cannot stand in isolation - its actions and behaviour affect society, the lives of people it transacts with and the nation at large. Sri Lanka until the 2007 Companies Act, through a capital maintenance approach protected the creditors of a company. This paper identifies the short-comings of the previous framework which was detrimental to the creditors’ interests, whilst also discussing the improvements made to shareholder and creditor protection by the 2007 Act. Also explores and evaluates the practical impact and importance of the solvency test as a mechanism to provide effective protection to stakeholders of a company. The paper is based on the hypothesis that the solvency regime is a major step in ensuring the integrity of the corporate sector and it provides a better protection to stakeholders of a company, as opposed to the protection afforded by capital maintenance rules.

Reference
  • 1. Ameresekere N. S. Salient Features of Companies Act No. 7 of 2007 https://www.consultants21.com/pdf/Enactment%20of%20Companies/Salient%20Features%20of%20Companies%20Act%20No.%207%20of%202007.pdf

    2. Cabral, H. ‘Companies Act No. 7 of 2007 and the Corporate Law of Sri Lanka’ (2007)

    3. Ewang, F. ‘Regulating Share Capital Transactions and creditors and creditor protection: a multifaceted model’ Australian Journal of Corporate Law 2007, p 51

    4. Farrar, J.H. The responsibility of directors and shareholders for a Company’s debt’ at p 8. http://www.nzlii.org/nz/journals/CanterLawRw/1989/2.pdf

    5. Farrar, JH., Furey, NE., Hannigan, BM., & Wylie, P. (1991). Farrar's Company Law (Third edition). Butterworths at P. 159

    6. Kanag-Iswaran, K. Wijayawardana, D., ‘Company Law’ (2014)

    7. Keay, A. R. “The insolvency Factor in the Avoidance of Antecedent Transactions in corporate Liquidation’ [1995] Monash University Law Review 305 at p. 307.

    8. Paul L. Davies & Sarah Worthington, ‘Gower & Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law’, 5th Edition at p. 242.

    9. Sanvada.org/policyanalysis/Pathfinder http://savanda.org/policyanalysis/savandhaComAct6.company%20law%