From stigma to community’s discrimination: the experience of 16 former prisoners in Malaysia
List of Authors
  • Jal Zabdi Mohd Yusoff , Khairiyah Md Shahid , Mohd Alif Jasni , Nini Syaheera Jasni , Noralina Omar , Siti Hajar Abu Bakar Ah , Zaiton Azman

Keyword
  • Stigma, discrimination, community, former prisoners

Abstract
  • Discrimination and stigma have been found to be one of the foremost factors that thwarted former prisoners to integrate well when released from prison. The effects of the discrimination that caused the former prisoners to be marginalized and disowned when to live in the original place. Rejection from the community of origin causes the former prisoner to fail to integrate smoothly and tends to re-engage in criminal life. In-depth interviews have been conducted on 16 former prisoners regardless of the type of offense committed. The analysis of the study has brought identification to the following three situations when respondents are in the community; (1) are excluded or not accepted by the neighboring residence, (2) neighbors do not want to know their presence, and (3) they are labeled with various embarrassing calls. These empirical findings can lead to the suggestion of a community-based program that can be implemented in bringing together former prisoners with the community as soon as they are released.

Reference
  • 1. Agnew, R. (2005). Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency. New York: Oxford University Press.
    2. Bazemore, G & Stinchcomb, J. (2004). A civic engagement model of reentry: involving community through service and restorative justice. Federal Probation, 68(2), 14–24.
    3. Cuervo, K & Villanueva, L. (2014). Analysis of risk and protective factors for recidivism in Spanish youth offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(11), 1149-1165.
    4. Hanson, R & Harris, A. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 6-35.
    5. Hipp, J., Petersilia, J & Turner, S. (2010). Parolee recidivism in California: The effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology, 48(4), 947 979.
    6. Hipp, J & Yates, D. (2009). Do returning parolees affect neighborhood crime? A case study of Sacramento. Criminology, 47(3), 619–656.
    7. Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A & Gutsell, J. (2012). Stereotype threat spillover: The short- and long-term effects of coping with threats to social identity. Dalam M. Inzlicht & Schmader T, (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 107-123). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    8. Jabatan Penjara Malaysia (2017). Jumlah banduan pengulanglaku jenayah, 2000-2016. Accessed on 25 May 2017 from Unit Sistem Maklumat: http://www.prison.gov.my/portal/page/portal/biru/kepenjaraan
    9. Kaplan, O & Nussio, E. (2016). Explaining recidivism of ex-combatants in Colombia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(1), 64-93.
    10. Kubrin, C & Stewart, E. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44(1), 165-198.
    11. La Vigne, N., Brooks, L & Shollenberger, T. (2007). Returning home: exploring the challenges and successes of recently released Texas prisoners. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
    12. LeBel, T., Burnett, R., Maruna, S & Bushway, S. (2008). The “chicken and egg” of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 130–58.
    13. McNeill, F & Whyte, B. (2007). Reducing reoffending: Social work and community justice in Scotland. Cullompton: Willan.
    14. Mohd Alif Bin Jasni (2018). The Need of Community Based Post Release and Aftercare Programme For Former Prisoner (Unpublished Thesis Doctorate). University of Malaya
    15. Moore, K., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J. (2013). Jail Inmates’ Perceived and Anticipated Stigma: Implications for Post-release Functioning. Self and Identity : The Journal of the International Society for Self and Identity, 12(5), 527–547.
    16. Morani, N., Wikoff, N., Linhorst, D., & Bratton, S. (2011). A description of the self-identified needs, service expenditures, and social outcomes of participants of a Prison-Reentry Program. The Prison Journal, 91, 347–365.
    17. Pager D & Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology. 34, 181 209.
    18. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–75.
    19. Pager, D., Western, B & Sugie, N. (2009). Sequencing disadvantage: barriers to employment facing young black and white men with criminal records. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1),195–213.
    20. Phillips, L & Lindsay, M. (2011). Prison to society: A mixed methods analysis of coping with reentry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(1), 136-154.
    21. Pizarro, J., Zgoba, K & Haugebrook. S. (2014). Supermax and Recidivism: An examination of the recidivism covariates among a sample of supermax ex-inmates. The Prison Journal, 94(2), 180-197.
    22. Pogorzelski, W., Wolff, N., Pan, K., & Blitz C. (2005). Behavioral health problems, ex-offender reentry policies, and the “Second Chance Act.” Public Health Consequences of Imprisonment, 95, 1718–1724.
    23. Ray, B., Grommon, E., Buchanan, V., Brown, B & Watson. (2015). Access to recovery and recidivism among former prison inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(8), 874-893.
    24. Sampson, R.J., Morenoff, J.D & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
    25. Schnittker, J & John, A. (2007). Enduring stigma: The long-term effects of incarceration on health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 16, 115-130.
    26. Shinkfield, A & Graffam, J. (2009). Community Reintegration of Ex-Prisoners Type and Degree of Change in Variables Influencing Successful Reintegration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and comparative criminology, 53(1).
    27. Solomon, A., Visher, C., La Vigne, N & Osborne, J. (2006). Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry: Research findings from the urban institute's prisoner reentry portfolio. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
    28. Uggen, C & Manza, J. (2002). Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review, 67(6), 777-803.
    29. Uggen, C., Manza, J, & Behrens, A. (Eds.) (2004). Less than the average citizen: Stigma, role transition, and the civic reintegration of convicted felons. Cullompton, England: Willan Publishing.
    30. Visher, C., & Travis, J. (2003). Transition from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89-113.
    31. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    32. Wolff, N & Draine, J. (2002). Dynamics of social capital of prisoners and community reentry: Ties that bind? Kertas dibentang di seminar yang dianjurkan oleh Public Health Dimensions of Reentry: Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable, Los Angeles.