COVID-19: COSTLY SIGNALS AND ENTREPRENEURIAL BRICOLAGE FOR SMES SURVIVABILITY FROM THE VIEW OF THE FINANCIAL-BASED CROWDFUNDING IN MALAYSIA
List of Authors
  • , KALSOM ABD. WAHAB , KALSOM ABD. WAHAB , SITI FATIMAH MOHD KASSIM, SITI FATIMAH MOHD KASSIM

Keyword
  • Costly signals, technological advancement, entrepreneurial bricolage, platform providers, social networks.

Abstract
  • Crowdfunding has altered the entrepreneurial funding landscape in Malaysia. Statistics generated by Securities Commission of Malaysia indicates that a number of small-and-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have benefitted from the equity (ECF) and peer-to -peer (P2P) lending in the crowdfunding markets. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has badly affected many economic sectors, especially SMEs. They are thus forced to adapt to the “new normal” in order to sustain continued growth and create shared value. The objective of this study is to explore the significance of costly signals, which attempts to explain instances of public generosity in which individuals incur costs without any immediate benefits or entrepreneurial bricolage, creating something from nothing by making do and applying combinations of resources at hand to new problems and opportunities to aid SMEs in obtaining financial assistance from the online investors. This is a conceptual study that refers to previous literature on costly signals and entrepreneurial bricolage. This study also used a content analysis technique where the equity crowdfunding platform’s website during movement control order (MCO) from 18th March, 2020 to 18th November, 2020 was examined to gather the information. The contents related to ECF campaigns on the platform’s website was extracted and used in the analysis. However, due to limited available literature on ECF and P2P on the available platforms, this study focused solely on the ECF campaigns hosted on the PitchIn Platform Sdn Bhd’s website. Prompt and innovative decisions are crucial especially during the pandemic. Entrepreneurs need to be able to highlight vital information for stakeholders and potential investors. ECF platforms also need to be able to present and highlight their information as this could reduce the asymmetry of information. In this manner, both the platform and the entrepreneur will benefit from the growth of the crowdfunding market in Malaysia. As the sustainability of the crowdfunding ecosystem in Malaysia depends on the sustainability of the entrepreneurs and the platform providers policy measures by the government should not be restricted merely to eliminating cash flow burdens, but should also include the wider entrepreneurial landscape to improve its efficiency. The government needs to have real-time information so that any uncertainty facing the entrepreneurs can be handled accordingly. This study also suggests future research to further investigate the importance of costly signals under crowdfunding umbrella.

Reference
  • Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955-980.
    Anderson, J., & Kupp, M. (2008). Serving the poor: Drivers of business model innovation in mobile. Info, 10(1), 5-12.
    Bae, J., Kim, S. J., & Oh, H. (2017). Taming polysemous signals: The role of marketing intensity on the relationship between financial leverage and firm performance. Review of Financial Economics, 33, 29-40.
    Baeck, P., & Collins, L. (2013). Working the Crowd: A short Guide to crowdfunding and how it can work for you. London: Nesta.
    Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
    Bapna, R., Gupta, A., Rice, S., & Sundararajan, A. (2017). Trust and the strength of ties in online social networks: an exploratory field experiment. Mis Q., 41(1), 115-130.
    Battaglia, F., Busato, F., & Manganiello, M. (2020). Equity crowdfunding: Brave market or safe haven for the crowd during the COVID-19 crisis? Available at SSRN 3666021.
    Baum, J. A., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 411- 436.
    Beck, R. (2017). Crowdinvesting: Die Investition der Vielen. Börsenbuchverlag.
    Behl, A., Dutta, P., Sheorey, P., & Singh, R. K. (2020). Examining the role of dialogic Communication and trust in donation-based crowd funding tasks using information quality perspective. The TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2020- 0139
    Bernstein, S., Korteweg, A., & Laws, K. (2017). Attracting early stage investors: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 509-538. Bhattacharya, U., & Dittmar, A. (2003). Costless versus costly signaling: Theory and evidence from share repurchases. Seminar Paper at Alabama, Humboldt, Frankfurt, Illinois, Indiana, INSEAD, Norwegian School of
    Management, Notre Dame, Penn State and Pittsburgh.
    Biancone, P. P., Secinaro, S., & Kamal, M. (2019). Crowdfunding and Fintech: Business model sharia compliant. European Journal of Islamic Finance, 12, 1-9.
    Bogle, J. C., & Sullivan, R. N. (2009). Markets in crisis. Financial Analysts Journal, 65(1), 17-24.
    Brown, R., & Rocha, A. (2020). Entrepreneurial uncertainty during the Covid-19 crisis: Mapping the temporal dynamics of entrepreneurial finance. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, E00174.
    Brown, R., Rocha, A., & Cowling, M. (2020). Financing entrepreneurship in times of crisis:
    Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on the market for entrepreneurial finance in the United Kingdom. International Small Business Journal, 38(5), 380-390.
    Bruton, G., Khavul, S., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2015). New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance, crowdfunding, and peer to peer innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 9-26.
    Brzozowska, B. (2013). Crowdfunding and crowdsourcing: New challenges for the visual documentation of city cultures. Cultural Studies Review/Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, 4(18), 301-310.
    Chan, C. R., & Parhankangas, A. (2017). Crowdfunding innovative ideas: How incremental and radical innovativeness influence funding outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 237-263.
    Chang, F., & Webster, C. M. (2019). Effects of network bricolage on entrepreneurs’ resource creation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 10137.
    Chen, Q., Zheng, S., & Mou, W. (2017). The relationship between financial reporting quality and investment efficiency. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2017). Atlantis Press.
    Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265-290.
    Cumming, D., & Johan, S. (2017). Chapter 5: Crowdfunding and entrepreneurial internationalization. In N. Dai, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The world scientific reference on entrepreneurship (Vol. 2): Entrepreneurial finance-managerial and policy implications (pp. 109-126). The World Scientific Publishers.
    Danilov, A., & Sliwka, D. (2017). Can contracts signal social norms? Experimental evidence. Management Science, 63(2), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2336
    Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or Bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 26-49.
    Deschryvere, M., Mikkola, M., & Conn, S. (2020). On the structural barriers to public innovation support for SMEs and the opportunity COVID-19 can offer to overcome these barriers. Journal of Innovation Management, 8(2), 16-25.
    Dessalles, J. L. (2014). Optimal investment in social signals. Evolution, 68(6), 1640-1650. Devera La Rosa, A. P. (2017). “Business Intelligence and Analytics applied to a collaboration platform”.
    Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681-703.
    Di Pietro, F., Grilli, L., & Masciarelli, F. (2020). Talking about a revolution? Costly and costless signals and the role of innovativeness in equity crowdfunding. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-32.
    Domínguez, D. G., García, D., Martínez, D. A., & Hernandez-Arriaga, B. (2020). Leveraging the power of mutual aid, coalitions, leadership, and advocacy during Covid-19. American Psychologist, 75(7), 909-918.
    Estrin, S., Gozman, D., & Khavul, S. (2018). The evolution and adoption of equity crowdfunding: Entrepreneur and investor entry into a new market. Small Business Economics, 1-15.
    Fanea-Ivanovici, M. (2018, June). Transparency of financial information on crowdfunding platforms–a prerequisite for successful funding campaigns. In International conference knowledge-based organization (Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 37-42). Sciendo.
    Farah Adilla. (2017, Nov. 6th). Govt establishing co-investment fund (CIF). New Straits Times. https://www.nst. com.my/business/2017/11/299864/govtestablishing-co-investment-fund-cif
    Fong, V. (2020, Apr. 16th). Crowdfunding: Securities Commission raises equity crowdfunding fundraising limits to RM 10 million. Fintech News Malaysia. https://
    fintechnews.my/23418/crowdfundingmalaysia/securities-commission-raisesequity-crowdfunding-fundraising-limits-torm-10-million/
    Freedman, D. M., & Nutting, M. R. (2015). Equity crowdfunding for investors: a guide to risks, returns, regulations, funding portals, due diligence, and deal terms. John Wiley & Sons. Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300.
    Gierczak, M. M., Bretschneider, U., Haas, P., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2015). Crowdfunding: Outlining the new era of fundraising. In O. Gajda, & D. Brüntje (Eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe – State of the art in theory and practice (pp. 7-23). Cham: Springer Science + Business Media.
    Gierczak, M. M., Bretschneider, U., Haas, P., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Crowdfunding: Outlining the new era of fundraising. In O. Gajda, & D. Brüntje (Eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe – State of the art in theory and practice (pp. 7-23). Springer International Publishing.
    Gomez, O. C. (2020, May 4th). Personal Wealth. The Wall: SC move a boost for ECF Industry. The Edge Markets. https://www. theedgemarkets.com/article/thewall-scmove-boost-ecf-industry.
    Green, A, Tunstall, R. J., & Peisl, T. (2015). The benefits of crowdfunding for early-stage entrepreneurs: between finance gap and democratic involvement. Paper presented at the R&D Management Conference, 23-26 Jun 2015, Pisa, Italy.
    Hagedorn, A., & Pinkwart, A. (2016). The financing process of equity-based crowdfunding: An empirical analysis. In D. Brüntje & O. Gajda (Eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe: State of the art in theory and practice (pp. 71-85). Springer International Publishing.
    Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P. (2012). Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 743-784.
    Helmer, J. (2014). 8 ways to cut through the crowdfunding clutter. Entrepreneur, 42(6), 86-90.
    Hidayat, S., Dirgantara, T., Kusuma, M. A., Utomo, H., Sudjud, R. W., Rejeki, I. S., ... & Tjahjono, H. (2020). Lessons learned from rapid development of CPAP ventilator vent-I during Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 52(5), 765-778.
    Hsu, D. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2013). Resources as dual sources of advantage: Implications for valuing entrepreneurial firm patents. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 761- 781.
    Kariv, D., & Coleman, S. (2015). Toward a theory of financial bricolage: The impact of small loans on new businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(2), 196-224.
    Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Craighead, C. W. (2020). Research at the intersection of entrepreneurship, supply chain management, and strategic management: Opportunities highlighted by COVID-19. Journal of Management, 46(8), 1330-1341.
    Kim, K., & Viswanathan, S. (2019). The experts in the crowd: The role of experienced investors in a crowdfunding market. Mis Quarterly, 43(2), 347-372.
    Kleinert, S., Volkmann, C., & Grünhagen, M. (2020). Third-party signals in equity crowdfunding: The role of prior financing. Small Business Economics, 54(1), 341-365.
    Kuckertz, A., Brändle, L., Gaudig, A., Hinderer, S., Reyes, C. A. M., Prochotta, A., ... & Berger, E. S. (2020). Startups in times of crisis–a rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, E00169.
    Kuek, S. K. Z. (2020, Aug. 13th). Personal Wealth. Fintech: First secondary market for P2P financing in Malaysia. The Edge Markets. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/ article/fintech-first-secondary-market-p2pfinancing-malaysia.
    Leung, T. Y., Sharma, P., Adithipyangkul, P., & Hosie, P. (2020). Gender equity and public health outcomes: The COVID-19 experience. Journal of Business Research, 116, 193-198.
    Liao, C., Zhu, Y., & Liao, X. (2015). The role of internal and external social capital in crowdfunding: Evidence from China. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Socialâ, 49, 187-204.
    Lim, J. Y. K., & Busenitz, L. W. (2020). Evolving human capital of entrepreneurs in an equity crowdfunding era. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(1), 106- 129.
    Loewenstein, G., Sunstein, C. R., & Golman, R. (2014). Disclosure: Psychology changes everything. Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 391-419. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annureveconomics-080213-041341.
    Löher, J., Schneck, S., & Werner, A. (2018). A research note on entrepreneurs’ financial commitment and crowdfunding success. Venture Capital, 20(3), 309-322.
    Lukkarinen, A., Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2016). Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems, 87, 26-38.
    Mahajan, S. (2013). Women entrepreneurship in India. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(10), 1143-1148.
    Mejia, J., Urrea, G., & Pedraza Martinez, A. J. (2019). Operational transparency on crowdfunding platforms: Effect on donations for emergency response. Production and Operations Management, 28(7), 1773-1791.
    Moine, A., & Papiasse, D. (2020). Evidence from France: How crowdfunding is being used to support the response to Covid-19. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog.
    https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/ europpblog/2020/04/24/evidence-fromfrance-how-crowdfunding-is-being-usedto-support-the-response-to-covid-19/
    Mollick, E. R. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16. Morse, A. (2015). Peer-to-peer crowdfunding: Information and the potential for disruption in consumer lending. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7, 463-482.
    MSMEAdmin. (2020, Nov. 13th). PitchIN Powers Past RM100 million Equity Crowdfunding Milestone. https://www.malaysiasme.com.my/pitchin-powers-past-rm100-millionequity-crowdfunding milestone/
    Ortiz, J., Young, A., Myers, M., Carbaugh, D., Bedeley, R. T., Chughtai, H., & Wigdor, A. (2019). Giving voice to the voiceless: The use of digital technologies by marginalized groups.
    Pazowski, P., & Czudec, W. (2014). Economic prospects and conditions of crowdfunding. Human Capital without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for Quality of Life; Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2014, 1079-1088.
    Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2018). Human capital signals and entrepreneurs’ success in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 51, 667–686. doi:10.1007/ s11187-017-9950-y
    Plummer, L. A., Allison, T. H., & Connelly, B. L. (2016). Better together? Signaling interactions in new venture pursuit of initial external capital. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1585-1604.
    Ramadani, V., Dana, L. P., Sadiku-Dushi, N., Ratten, V., & Welsh, D. H. (2017). Decision-making challenges of women entrepreneurship in family business .l , process. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 25(04), 411-439.
    Salomon, V. (2016). Emergent models of financial intermediation for innovative companies: from venture capital to crowdinvesting platforms in switzerland. Venture Capital, 18(1), 21-41.
    Securities Commission Malaysia. (2015). Guidelines on Regulation of Markets Under Section 34 of CMSA SC-GL/2-2015. https:// www.sc.com.my/wp-content/uploads/eng/ html/resources/guidelines/rep/guidelines_ rep_150210.pdf
    Securities Commission Malaysia. (2015). List of Registered Market Ope00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000rators for ECF. https://www.sc.com.my/digital/equitycrowdfunding/list-of-registered-marketoperators-for-ecf/
    Securities Commission Malaysia. (2015). SC Releases New Guidelines to Facilitate Equity Crowdfunding. https://www.sc.com.my/ post_archive/sc-releases-new-guidelinesto-facilitate-equity-crowdfunding/
    Securities Commission Malaysia. (2016). Recognized Markets (ECF, P2P and Digital Asset Exchanges). https://www.sc.com.my/ regulation/guidelines/recognizedmarkets/
    Securities Commission Malaysia. (2017). Annual Report 2017. https://www.sc.com.my/api/ documentms/download.ashx?Id=097e62ec8464-46a2-A3e0-9cb4ee164ca7
    Securities Commission Malaysia. (2018). Annual Report 2018. https://www.sc.com.my/api/ documentms/download.ashx?Id=69b9ad2a13c7-40bf-B0d3-341951a62278
    Securities Commission Malaysia. (2020). ECF/ P2P. https://www.sc.com.my/analytics/ ecfp2p.
    Securities Commission Malaysia. (2020). Guidelines on Recognized Markets (Archive – 5 May 2020). SG – GL/6- 2105. Part F: Additional Requirements Relating to a Recognized Market that is a Crowdfunding Platform. Chapter 13: Equity Crowdfunding Platform., page 25-36. https://www.sc.com.my/ask-aliss#search/ equity%20crowdfuning%20platform.
    Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2011). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230.
    Shahzad, F., Rehman, I. U., Hanif, W., Asim, G. A., & Baig, M. H. (2019). The influence of financial reporting quality and audit quality on investment efficiency. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 27(4), 600-614.
    Steigenberger, N., & Wilhelm, H. (2018). Extending signaling theory to rhetorical signals: Evidence from crowdfunding. Organization Science, 29(3), 529-546.
    Stenholm, P., & Renko, M. (2016). Passionate bricoleurs and new venture survival. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 595- 611.
    Swart, R., & Milner, M. E. (2015, Nov. 05th). Crowdfunding a roadmap for Global Solution Networks. Global Solution Networks.
    Tsilika, T., Kakouris, A., Apostolopoulos, N., & Dermatis, Z. (2020). Entrepreneurial bricolage in the aftermath of a shock: Insights from Greek SMEs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 1-18.
    Tuomi, K., & Harrison, R. T. (2017). A comparison of equity crowdfunding in four countries: Implications for business angels. Strategic Change, 26(6), 609-615.
    Vanevenhoven, J., Winkel, D., Malewicki, D., Dougan, W. L., & Bronson, J. (2011). Varieties of bricolage and the process of entrepreneurship. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 53-66.
    Vismara, S. (2018). Information cascades among investors in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 467-497.
    Wenzel, M., Stanske, S., & Lieberman, M. B. (2020). Strategic responses to crisis. Strategic Management Journal, 41, V7- V18.
    Woköck, J. (2019). Business Angel Celebrities – How Investors’ Social Media Signaling Supports Resource Acquisition of Early Stage Ventures. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ icis2019/innov_entre/innov_entre/10/