A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OF THE NEW MALAYSIAN INDEX OF ELDERLY WELL-BEING: A PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
List of Authors
  • HAZWAN MAT DIN , RAHIMAH IBRAHIM

Keyword
  • Scale validation, ageing, measurement, quality of life, life satisfaction, older adults, older persons

Abstract
  • Malaysia is experiencing rapid ageing. With such rapid demographic changes, the need for understanding elderly well-being become a necessity. This study aims to validate a new developed Malaysian index of elderly well-being (MIEW) among the Malaysian community-dwelling elderly. A cross-sectional study was conducted among the elderly in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. The preliminary MIEW contained 40 items and is composed of five factors; economic, health, social, psycho-spiritual and environmental well-being. Confirmatory factor analysis using maximum likelihood estimation method was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the instrument. A total of 629 respondents participated in this study, with an average age of 70.36 years old. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded 18 items with five factors. The model fitted the data well, showing strong construct validity and reliability of the instrument. The findings from this study suggested an acceptable level of validity and reliability for the new instrument. However, MIEW should be used with caution as the discriminant validity of social and environmental well-being was unsatisfactory. Further research in this section is recommended.

Reference
  • Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA.
    Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 238.
    Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research: Guilford Publications.
    Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Abingdon: Routledge Academic.
    Choudhary, M. A., Levine, P., McAdam, P., & Welz, P. (2011). The happiness puzzle: analytical aspects of the Easterlin paradox. Oxford Economic Papers, 64(1), 27-42.
    Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions: New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social indicators research, 40(1-2), 189-216.
    Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
    Din, H. M., Arifin, W. N., Abdullah, S., Yusoff, M. S. B., & Aziz, A. A. (2018). The Internal Structure of New Attitudes towards Statistics Inventory among Postgraduate Students in Medical and Health Sciences. Education in Medicine Journal, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2018.10.4.6
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
    Fullilove, M. T. (2001). Links between the social and physical environments. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 48(5), 1253-1266.
    Hair, J., Black, W., & Balin, B. (2009). BJ, & Anderson, RE (2010). Multivariate data analysis, 7.
    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435.
    Hoque, A., Awang, Z., Jusoff, K., Salleh, F., & Muda, H. (2017). Social Business Efficiency: Instrument Development and Validation Procedure using Structural Equation Modelling. International Business Management, 11(1), 222-231.
    Ju, H., Shin, J. W., Kim, C.-w., Hyun, M.-h., & Park, J.-w. (2013). Mediational effect of meaning in life on the relationship between optimism and well-being in community elderly. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 56(2), 309-313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.008
    Kahn, R. L., & Juster, F. T. (2002). Well–Being: concepts and measures. Journal of Social Issues, 58(4), 627-644.
    Joseph, S., Linley, P. A., Harwood, J., Lewis, C. A., & McCollam, P. (2004). Rapid assessment of well being: The short depression happiness scale (SDHS). Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77(4), 463-478. https://doi.org/1476083042555406
    Luchesi, B. M., de Oliveira, N. A., de Morais, D., de Paula Pessoa, R. M., Pavarini, S. C. I., & Chagas, M. H. N. (2018). Factors associated with happiness in the elderly persons living in the
    community. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 74, 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.10.006
    Mat Din, H., Raja Adnan, R., & Minhat, H. (2020). Psychometric properties of mos social support survey among malaysian community-dwelling older adults. Asian Journal Of Research In Education And Social Sciences, 2(1), 62-73.
    Meléndez, J. C., Tomás, J. M., Oliver, A., & Navarro, E. (2009). Psychological and physical dimensions explaining life satisfaction among the elderly: A structural model examination. Archives
    of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48(3), 291-295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2008.02.008
    Naess, S. (1999). Subjective approach oo quality of life. Feminist Economics, 5(2), 115-118.
    Nolan, M. M., Beran, T., & Hecker, K. G. (2012). Surveys assessing students’attitudes toward statistics: a systematic review of validity and reliability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2).
    Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2001). To be happy or to be self-fulfileld: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(16), 141-166.
    Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
    Sen, A. K. (2001). Development as freedom: Oxford University Press.
    Sim, O. F., & Hamid, T. A. (2010). Social protection in Malaysia-current state and challenges towards practical and sustainable social protection in East Asia: A compassionate community.
    Social Protection in East Asia-Current State And Challenges, 182.
    Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
    Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of life Outcomes, 5(1), 63. https://doi.
    org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
    United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Social Development Division. (2017). Ageing in Asia and the Pacific: Overview. Retrieved from http://mipaa.unescapsdd.org/files/documents/SDD%20Ageing%20Fact%20Sheet%20Overview.pdf
    Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.