1. Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 99-110.
2. Aliyu, A. A., Rosmain, T., & Takala, J. (2014). Online banking and customer service delivery in Malaysia: data screening and preliminary findings. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 562-570.
3. Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Chicago, IL, 384-398.
4. Bauer, R. A. (1967). Source effect and persuasibility: A new look. Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior, 559-578.
5. Cunningham, S. M. (1967). Perceived risk as a factor in informal consumer communications. Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior, 265, 288.
6. Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(4), 451-474
7. Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. ACR Special Volumes
.
8. Lee, M. C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic commerce research and applications, 8(3), 130-141.
9. Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in human behavior, 21(6), 873-891.
10. Ling, G. M., Fern, Y. S., Boon, L. K., & Huat, T. S. (2016). Understanding customer satisfaction of internet banking: A case study in Malacca. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 80-85.
11. Littler, D., & Melanthiou, D. (2006). Consumer perceptions of risk and uncertainty and the implications for behaviour towards innovative retail services: the case of internet banking. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 13(6), 431-443.
12. Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1-13.
13. Malaysiafinancialservices.wordpress.com. (2015). Online Banking – Malaysia Financial Services. Retrieve from:https://malaysiafinancialservices.wordpress.com/category /online-banking/.
14. Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1-13.
15. Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Guide: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
16. Paluch, S., & Wünderlich, N. V. (2016). Contrasting risk perceptions of technology-based service innovations in inter-organizational settings. Journal of business Research, 69(7), 2424-2431.
17. Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of marketing, 35(1), 56-61.
18. Sanayei, A., & Bahmani, E. (2012). Integrating TAM and TPB with perceived risk to measure customers’ acceptance of internet banking. International Journal of Information science and management (IJISM), 25-37.
19. Singhal, D., & Padhmanabhan, V. (2008). A study on customer perception towards internet banking: Identifying major contributing factors. Journal of Nepalese business studies, 5(1), 101-111.
20. Goh, T.E. (2014). Malaysia among countries most hit by e-banking malware: Trend Micro. Digital News Asia. Retrieve from: https://www.digitalnewsasia.com/security/ malaysia-among-countries-most-hit-by-ebanking-malware-trend-micro.
21. Yang, Q., Pang, C., Liu, L., Yen, D. C., & Tarn, J. M. (2015). Exploring consumer perceived risk and trust for online payments: An empirical study in China’s younger generation. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 9-24.
22. Yousafzai, S. Y., Pallister, J. G., & Foxall, G. R. (2003). A proposed model of e-trust for electronic banking. Technovation, 23(11), 847-860.