The determinants of Islamic mutual fund flows: evidence from Malaysia
List of Authors
  • Ainulashikin Marzuki , Bani Atta, Anas Ahmad

Keyword
  • Islamic mutual fund, fund flows, fund family size, fund family age, past performance

Abstract
  • Islamic mutual funds (IMF) are growing as a substitutional investment vehicle for investors who want to combine value and financial objectives in their investment. A group of the funds is managed by one Investment Company called the family of funds, different families follow different strategies that distinguish them from each other. This study investigates the flow-performance relationship in IMF, in addition to the extent to which family and fund characteristics contribute to explaining fund flows in Malaysia for the period from 2009 to 2017. The study uses raw returns to calculate the fund performance and use the percentage money flow (FLOW), defined as money flow scaled by the total net asset of the fund. The study use panel regression models to estimate the relationship between fund flow and performance, fund, and family variables. The results show there are positive relationship between past performance and fund flow that mean IMF investors make rational financial decisions by directing fund flows to better performing funds. The results also indicate there are negative relationship between fund flows and fund risk may be due to IMF performing better during the bearish market since the risk is high. Finally, the results indicate there are negative relationship between fund flows and fund size, family size, number of funds in the family, this may be because when family or fund become larger and included more funds can’t preserve the same high growth rate.

Reference
  • 1. Abderrezak, F. (2008). The performance of Islamic equity funds: A comparison to conventional, Islamic and ethical benchmarks. Retrieved April, 1, 2010.

    2. Abdullah, F., Hassan, T., & Mohamad, S. (2007). Investigation of performance of Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds. Managerial Finance, 33(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350710715854.

    3. Agussalim, M., Limakrisna, N., & Ali, H. (2017). Mutual Funds Performance : Conventional and Sharia Product. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(4), 150– 156. Retrieved from www.econjournals.com.

    4. Ahmad, Y., Sun, G., & Khidmat, W. Bin. (2017). Fund-specific Determinants of Performance: An Empirical Study of Islamic and Conventional Mutual Funds of Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(5), 359–370. Retrieved from http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/5429/pdf.

    5. Azmi, W., Mohamad, S., & Shah, M. E. (2018). Nonfinancial traits and financial smartness: International evidence from Shariah-compliant and Socially Responsible funds. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.02.001.

    6. Barber, B. M., Odean, T., & Zheng, L. (2005). Out of Sight , Out of Mind : The Effects of Expenses on Mutual Fund Flows. Journal of Business, 78(6), 2095–2119. https://doi.org/10.1086/497042.

    7. Benson, K. L., & Humphrey, J. E. (2008). Socially responsible investment funds: Investor reaction to current and past returns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1850–1859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.013.

    8. Benson, K. L., Tang, G., & Tutticci, I. (2008). The Relevance of Family Characteristics to Individual Fund Flows. Australian Journal of Management, 32(3), 419–443.

    9. Bhattacharya, U., Lee, J. H., & Pool, V. K. (2013). Conflicting family values in mutual fund families. Journal of Finance, 68(1), 173–200.

    10. Bhojraj, S., Jun Cho, Y., & Yehuda, N. (2011). Mutual Fund Family Size and Mutual Fund Performance: The Role of Regulatory Changes. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 647–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00436.x.

    11. Bollen, N. P. B. (2007). Mutual Fund Attributes and Investor Behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(03), 683. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004142.

    12. Boo, Y. L., Ee, M. S., Li, B., & Rashid, M. (2016). Islamic or conventional mutual funds: Who has the upper hand? Evidence from Malaysia. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 42, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.01.004.

    13. Brown, D. P., & Wu, Y. (2012). Mutual Fund Families and Performance Evaluation. Working Paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison,.

    14. Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., Kubik, J. D., American, T., Review, E., & Dec, N. (2004). Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance ? The Role of Liquidity and Organization. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1276–1302. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828043052277.

    15. Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1997). Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 105(6), 1167–1200. https://doi.org/10.1086/516389.

    16. Clare, A., O’Sullivan, N., & Sherman, M. (2014). Family status and mutual fund performance. Journal of Asset Management, 15(3), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2014.19.

    17. Del, D., & Tkac, P. A. (2008). Star Power : The Effect of Morningstar Ratings on Mutual Fund Flow All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Star Power : The Effect of Morningstar Ratings on Mutual Fund Flow, 43(4), 907–936.

    18. Dubai Islamic Bank. (2016). Overview of the Global Islamic Finance Industry. Retrieved from http://www.gifr.net/publications/gifr2017/intro.pdf.

    19. El Ghoul, S., & Karoui, A. (2017). Does corporate social responsibility affect mutual fund performance and flows? Journal of Banking and Finance, 77, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.10.009.

    20. El Khamlichi, A., Arouri, M., & Teulon, F. (2014). Persistence of performance using the four-factor pricing model: Evidence from dow jones islamic index. Journal of Applied Business Research, 30(3), 917–927.

    21. Elfakhani, S., Hassan, M. K., & Yusuf, S. (2005). Comparative Performance of Islamic Versus Secular Mutual Funds. In 12th Economic Research Forum Conference in Cairo, Egypt, 53, 19–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

    22. Gallaher, S., Kaniel, R., Edelen, R., Gillan, S., Hartzell, J., Johnson, W., & Reid, B. (2008). Advertising and Mutual Funds : From Families to Individual Funds by Advertising and Mutual Funds : From Families to Individual Funds.

    23. Gruber, M. J. (1996). Another Puzzle : The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds. The Journal of Finance, 51(3), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329222.

    24. Hoepner, A. G. F., Rammal, H. G., & Rezec, M. (2013). Islamic mutual funds’ financial performance and international investment style: Evidence from 20 countries. European Journal of Finance, 17(9–10), 829–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2010.538521.

    25. Ippolito, R. A. (1992). Consumer Reaction to Measures of Poor Quality: Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry. The Journal of Law and Economics, 35(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1086/467244.

    26. Kammer, M. A., Norat, M. M., Pinon, M. M., Prasad, A., Towe, M. C. M., & Zeidane, M. Z. (2015). Islamic finance: Opportunities, challenges, and policy options. International Monetary Fund.

    27. Leung, D., & Kwong, M. (2018). The Flow - Performance Relationship in Emerging Market Bond Funds., (4).

    28. Makni, R., Benouda, O., & Delhoumi, E. (2015). Large scale analysis of Islamic equity funds using a meta-frontier approach with data envelopment analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 34, 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.02.014.

    29. Malaysia. World’s slamic Finance Marketplace (MIFC). (2017). Islamic Funds: Gearing Up. Retrieved from http://www.mifc.com/index.php?ch=28&pg=72&ac=180&bb=uploadpdf.

    30. Marzuki, A., & Worthington, A. C. (2015). Comparative performance-related fund flows for Malaysian Islamic and conventional equity funds. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 8(3), 380–394.

    31. Marzuki and Worthington. (2015). Comparative performance-related fund flows for Malaysian Islamic and conventional equity funds. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 8(3), 380–394.

    32. Merdad, H., Hassan, M. K., & Alhenawi, Y. (2010). Islamic Versus Conventional Mutual Funds Performance in Saudi Arabia: A Case Study. JKAU: Islamic Economics, 23(2), 157–193.

    33. Nanda, V., Wang, Z. J., & Zheng, L. (2004). Family Values and the Star Phenomenon : Strategies of Mutual Fund Families. The Review of Financial Studies, 17(3), 667–698.

    34. Renneboog, L., ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2006). Is Ethical Money Financially Smart? Journal of Finance, (January). Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2011). Is ethical money financially smart? Nonfinancial attributes and money flows of socially responsible investment funds. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20(4), 562–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2010.12.003.

    35. Sawicki, J. (2001). Investors’ differential response to managed fund performance. Journal of Financial Research, 24(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 6803.2001.tb00775.x.

    36. Sirri, E., & Tufano, P. (1998). Costly search and mutual fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1589–1622. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.co.uk.