The influence of social categories on students’ self-selected group work formation in a private university in Malaysia
List of Authors
  • Ong, Sue Lyn

Keyword
  • Intercultural communication, social categories, social identities, group work, self-selected group work formation

Abstract
  • When students of multi-ethnic and multi-lingual Malaysians and international students from culturally diverse backgrounds work together in group assignments, negotiations on whom to include or exclude would take place during the formation of self-selected groups. Social categories appears to influence students’ choices in group membership during these face-to-face interactions. Set against the backdrop of Intercultural Communication, the objective of this study is to investigate the influence of the specific social categories of age, gender, nationality, ethnicity, religion, mother tongue and English language ability on self-selected group work formation. Relying on a basic quantitative approach for a case study, a set of questionnaire with a 5-point Likert-type scale was developed. Participants were asked whether or not they prefer to work with other participants from the same or similar social categories. The study found that in the formation of self-selected groups, the social categories of age and English language ability are significantly influential. This study affirms that social categories influence students’ choices in self-selected group work formations.

Reference
  • 1. Aggarwal, P. & O’Brien, C.L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural actecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education. 30 (3): 255-264.
    2. Anis Maesin, Mahani Mansor, Latisha Asmaak, & Shafie Surina Nayan. (2009). A Study of Collaborative Learning among Malaysian Undergraduates. Asian Social Science. 5 (7): 70-76. (Online) http://ccsenet.org/journal.html.
    3. Baker, T. & Clark, J. (2008). Cooperative learning: A double edged sword: A cooperative learning model for use with diverse student groups. Paper presented in IAIE IASCE Conference, January 19-22. Turin, Italy. (Online) http://www.iaie.org/i_turinpapers.html.
    4. Bentwell, B. & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    5. Blaikie, N. (2003). Analyzing quantitative data: From description to explanation. London: Sage Publications.
    6. Blatchford, P & Kutnick, P. (2003). Guest editorial. Developing group work in everyday classrooms: an introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Educational Research. 39: 1-7.
    7. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology. 30: 745-778.
    8. Bruffee, K. (1981). Collaborative learning. College English. 43 (7): 745-747.
    9. Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies. 7 (4-5): 585-614.
    10. Campbell, J & Li, M. (2006). Asian students’ perceptions of group work and Group Assignments in a New Zealand Tertiary Institution. Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2006 International Conference. Engagement and Empowerment: new Opportunities for Growth in Higher Education. 22-24 Nov, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia.
    11. Cantwell, R.H. & Andrews, B. (2002). Cognitive and psychological factors underlying secondary school students’ feelings towards group work. Educational Psychology. 22 (1): 75-91.
    12. Chapman, K.J., Meuter, M., Toy, D. & Wright, L. (2006). Can’t we pick our own groups? The influence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes. Journal of Management Education. 30: 557-569.
    13. Clarke, B.A., Miers, M.E., Pollard, K.C. & Thomas, J. (2007). Complexities of learning together: Students’ experience of face-to-face interprofessional groups. Learning in Health and Social Care. 6 (4): 202-212.
    14. De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D. & Bamberg, M. (2006). Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    15. Drury, H., Kay, J. & Losberg, W. (2002). Student satisfaction with groupwork in undergraduate computer science: Do things get better? In Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2003), Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Vol 20. Adelaide, Australia.
    16. Dyball, M.C., Reid, A., Ross, P. & Schoch, H. (2010). Compulsory group work – accounting students’ conceptions and suggestions. Asian Review of Accounting. 18 (2): 92-105.
    17. Esmonde, I., Brodie, K., Dookie, L. & Takeuchi, M. (2009). Social identities and opportunities to learn: Student perspectives on group work in an urban mathematics classroom. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education. 2 (2): 18-45.
    18. Forrester, W.R. & Tashchian, A. (2010). Effects of personality on attitudes toward academic group work. American Journal of Business Education. 3 (3): 39-46.
    19. Forsyth, D.R. (2006). Group dynamics (4th Ed). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
    20. Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: integrating theory and practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
    21. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education. 7 (1) (Online) http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/jte-v7n1/gokhale.jte-v7n1.html
    22. Gudykunst, W.B. & Kim, Y.K. (1997). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication. Boston: McGraw-Hill
    23. Hall, B, J. (2005). Among cultures: The challenge of communication (2nd Ed). Belmont, C.A.: Thomson Wadsworth.
    24. Harman, L.D. (1988). The Modern Stranger: On Language and Membership. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    25. Hinds, P. J., Carley, K. M., Krackhardt, D. & Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 81 (2): 226-251.
    26. Hogg, M.A. & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge
    27. Ituarte, S. & Davies, G. (2007). Perception of ‘self’ and ‘other’: Social boundaries that influence teaching and learning in increasingly diverse US classrooms. In Palfreyman, D. & McBride, D.L. (eds). Learning and teaching across cultures in Higher Education, pp. 74-92. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
    28. Jandt, F.E. (2010). An introduction to intercultural communication: Identities in a global community (6th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    29. Jenkins, R. (2008a). Social identity (3rd Ed). Oxon, U.K.: Routledge.
    30. Jenkins, R. (2008b). Rethinking ethnicity: Arguments and explorations (2nd Ed). London: Sage
    31. Kelly, P. (2008). Achieving desirable group-work outcomes through the group allocation process. Team Performance Management. 14 (1-2): 22-38.
    32. Keyton, J. (1988). Is Group Self-Selection an important organizational variable? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern States Speech Association. Apr 7-10. Memphis, TN. (Online) http://www.eric.ed.gov/
    33. Killick, D. (2011). Internationalising the university: Enabling selves-in-the-world. In: Bent Preisler, Ida Klitgard & Anne H. Fabricius (eds). Language and Learning in the International University, pp.76-95. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters: Languages for Intercultural Communication and Education.
    34. Martin, J. N. & Nakayama, T.K. (2014). Experiencing intercultural communication: An introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    35. Martin, J. N. & Nakayama, T.K. (2013). Intercultural communication in contexts (6th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    36. Melles, G. (2004). Understanding the role of language/culture in group work through qualitative interviewing. The Qualitative Report. 9 (2): 216-240.
    37. Montgomery, C. (2011). Developing perceptions of interculturality: A trouble space? In: Bent Preisler, Ida Klitgard & Anne H. Fabricius (eds). Language and Learning in the International University, pp. 59-75. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters: Languages for Intercultural Communication and Education.
    38. Nair-Venugopal, S. (2003). Approximations of social reality as interpretations of culture: extending a framework of analysis in intercultural communication. Weaver, G. (ed). Journal of International Communication. 9 (2): 13-28.
    39. Nair-Venugopal, S. (2009). Interculturalities: reframing identities in intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication. 9 (2): 76-90.
    40. Nair-Venugopal, S. (2015). Issues of language and competence in intercultural business contexts. Language and Intercultural Communication. 15 (1): 29-45.
    41. Neo, M. (2005). Engaging students in group-based co-operative learning. A Malaysian perspective. Educational Technology & Society. 8 (4): 220-232.
    42. Ostberg, K.J. (2009). Collaborating through conversation: Small group discussion in a pre-service teacher education course. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. New York: New York University.
    43. Popov, V., Brinkman, D., Biemans, H.J.A, Mulder, M., Kuznetsov, A. & Noroozi, O. (2012). Multicultural student group work in higher education: An explorative case study on challenges as perceived by students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 36: 302-317.
    44. Rampton, B. (2013). Language, social categories and interaction. Paper presented in the panel Multiethnolects in urban Europe: The role of social categories. ISB8 Conference, 17 June 2011, Oslo.
    45. Slavin, R.E. (1996). Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need To Know. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 21 (4): 43-69.
    46. Strauss, P. (2001). ‘I’d rather vomit up a live hedgehog’- L2 students and group assessment in mainstream university programs. Propsect. 16 (2): 55-66.
    47. Strauss, P., U, A. & Young, S. (2011). ‘I know the type of people I work well with’: Student anxiety in multicultural group projects. Studies in Higher Education. 36 (7): 815-829.
    48. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. London: Cambridge University Press.
    49. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. London: Cambridge University Press.
    50. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: W. Austin & S.
    51. Worchel (eds). The social psychology of intergroup relations, pp. 33-47. Monterey, CA.: Brooks/Cole.
    52. Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J. & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Religion: An overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 34 (4): 377-394.
    53. Ting-Toomey, S. & Chung, L.C. 2005. Understanding intercultural communication. Los Angeles, California: Roxbury Publishing Company.
    54. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: Henri Tajfel (ed). Social identity and intergroup relations, pp. 15-40. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
    55. Turner, J. C. (1996). Henri Tajfel: An introduction. In: W. Peter Robinson (ed). Social Groups and Identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel, pp. 1-24. Oxford, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    56. Verkuyten, M. (2011). Religious identity and socio-political participation: Muslim minorities in Western Europe. In: Assaad, E. Azzi, Xenia Chryssochoou, Bert Klandermans & Bernd Simon (eds).
    57. Identity and Participation in Culturally Diverse Societies: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, pp. 32-48. Malden, M.A.: Wiley-Blackwell.
    58. Volet, S.E. & Ang, G. (1998). Culturally mixed groups on international campuses: An opportunity for inter-cultural learning. Higher Education Research & Development. 17 (1): 5-23.
    59. Wetherell, M. (2010). The field of identity studies. In: Margaret Wetherell & Chandra Talpade Mohanty (eds). The SAGE Handbook of Identities, pp. 3-26. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    60. Ylanne-McEwen, V. (1999). Young at heart: Discourses of age identity in travel agency interaction. Ageing and Society. 19: 417-440.
    61. Ysseldyk, K. M. & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion form a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 14 (1): 60-71.
    62. Zhu, H. (2011). Introduction: Themes and issues in the study of language and intercultural communication. In: Zhu Hua (ed). The language and intercultural communication reader, pp. 1-14. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.