Teachers’ experiences and perceptions on the quality of teaching and learning in Private Early Learning Centres (PELCS) in South Africa
List of Authors
  • Phajane, Masello Hellen

Keyword
  • Private early learning centres, experiences, perceptions, quality of teaching, school management team

Abstract
  • Empirical research has confirmed the importance of quality of teaching and learning in Private Early Learning Centres (PELCs) to subordinates in improving the quality of teaching and learning. This study investigated the nature of quality of teaching and learning in Private Early Learning Centres (PELCs) provided at previously marginalised Private Early Learning Centres (PELCs) of the Gauteng Province in South Africa. To meet this objective qualitative research design was used. The subjects of the study were all purposefully selected teachers, Head of Department and School Manage Team (SMT). Data was collected through observations and semi structured interviews (individual and focus group). The total number of 14 purposefully selected participants took part in the research. Participants were selected according to the socio-economic status of their school. A theoretical framework, based on a model of quality development by Woodhead, informed the study. The findings showed that the quality of teaching and learning in PELCs compromised the quality of teaching. Teachers were also very vocal about the absence of support they get with regard to classroom practices from the School Management Team (SMT). The Head of Department also mentioned lack of knowledge of quality of teaching and learning in PELCs practices, work overload and limited time as challenges that inhibit them to provide the needed support.

Reference
  • 1. Aluko, R. (2014). From evaluation to reflection-on-action. South African Journal of Higher Education. 28(5): 1497‒1512.
    2. Berry, L., Biersteker, L., Dawes, A., Lake, L. & Smith, C. (2013). South African child gauge. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
    3. Clasquin-Johnson, M.G. (2011). Responses of early childhood teachers to curriculum change in South Africa. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
    4. Cram, F., Chilisa, B. & Mertens, D. M. (2013). The journey begins. In D. M. Mertens, F. Cram & B. Chilisa (eds.), Indigenous pathways into social research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
    5. Davin, R.J., Orr, J.P., Marais, P. & Meier, C. (2010). Managing the learning environment in early childhood development centres. In: Meier, C. & Marais, P. (eds.) Education Management in Early Childhood Development. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
    6. Department of Basic Education (2011). Guidelines for responding to learner diversity in the classroom / English. National curriculum statement: Curriculum assessment policy statement. Grade R–12. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.
    7. Guile, D. (2014). Professional Knowledge and Professional Practice as Continuous Re Contextualisation, in Young and Muller (Eds) (2014a).
    8. Higgins, S., Kokotsaki, D., and Coe, R. (2012). The Teaching and Learning Toolkit. Education Endowment Foundation and the Sutton Trust.
    9. Kruger, C., Wessels, E., Ebrahim, H. & Shaik, N., (2015), ‘Teaching and learning’, in L. Excell & V. Linington (ed.), Teaching grade R, pp. 190–204, Juta, Cape Town.
    10. Lam, D., C. Ardington & M. Leibbrandt. (2010). “Schooling as a Lottery: Racial Differences in School Advancement in Urban South Africa”. Journal of Development Economics.
    11. Lewin, T., and Mawoyo, M. (2014). Student Access and Success: Issues and Interventions in South African Universities. Cape Town: Inyathelo. The South African Institute for Advancement.
    12. Mayesky, M., (2012), Creative activities for young children, 10th edn. Delmar Cengage Learning, New York.
    13. Nieuwenhuis, J. (2010). Introducing qualitative research. In First steps in research, ed. K. Maree, 46-68. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
    14. Samuels, M. L., Taylor, S., Shepherd, D., van der Berg, S., Jacob, C., Deliwe, C, N and Mabogoane, T. (2015). Reflecting on an impact evaluation of the Grade R programme: Method, results and policy responses. A Journal of African Evaluation Association, 3 (1)
    15. Shanahan, M. (2016). Utilising activity theory as a framework to evaluate the implementation of a virtual simulation educational tool. Melbourne: School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University. 769-778.
    16. Sharples, J., Slavin, R., Chambers, B. and Sharp, C. (2011). Effective classroom strategies for closing the gap in educational achievement for learners and young people living in poverty, including white working-class boys: Schools and Communities Research Review 4: C4EO.
    17. Smidt, S. (2010). Key Issues in Early Years Education: A Guide for Students and Practitioners. Routledge: New York.
    18. Smit, B. & Romm, N. R. A. (2012). Focus group field guide: 500 hundred schools project. Pretoria: Unisa Press.
    19. Steyn, G.M. (2010). Implementing invitational education by means of professional Development in schools: A case study. School of Education Research Conference: ‘Sharing Excellence in Research’. 21, 22 July. Burgerspark Hotel, Pretoria.
    20. Sullivan, S. and Glanz, J. (2013). Supervision that improves teaching and learning: Strategies and techniques. London: Corwin Press.
    21. Taguma, M., Litjens, I. & Makowiecki, K. (2012). Quality matters in early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.
    22. Vandeyar, S. (2010). Responses of South African teachers to the challenges of school Integration. South African Journal of Education. 30:343-359.
    23. Westraadt, G. 2010. Review upon review and the impact on Visual Art Education. Manuscript. Zepeda, S.J. (2012). Professional development: What works? (2nd Ed.). Larchmont: Eye on Education.