Enhancing solid waste management education: Understanding engineering students’ preferences for teaching and learning methods
List of Authors
  • Dzulaikha Khairuddin , Norfarah Nadia Ismail

Keyword
  • Solid waste management, Engineering students, Teaching and learning methods, Preferences

Abstract
  • Solid waste management stands as a crucial pillar of sustainable development, addressing global concerns about waste generation and its ecological impacts. To equip future engineers with the requisite knowledge and skills, effective educational strategies are essential. This study explores the preferences of engineering students for teaching and learning methods within the context of solid waste management education. Through a comprehensive descriptive analysis, data was gathered from 51 participants using a structured questionnaire. The findings reveal a strong inclination towards active learning approaches, such as hands-on activities and real-life case studies, indicating a preference for practical and experiential learning. Moreover, students expressed positive attitudes towards the integration of technology and online resources, emphasizing the importance of engaging and interactive digital tools. The study underscores students’ desire for a student-centered environment by valuing their feedback and suggestions in educational design. Additionally, students displayed a preference for engaging and interesting teaching methods that enhance their motivation to learn. Collaborative learning experiences, particularly through group assignments, were also favored. These insights provide educators and institutions with valuable guidance for refining instructional strategies, enhancing curriculum design, and creating engaging and effective learning environments tailored to students’ preferences.

Reference
  • 1. Bhogayata, A., & Jadeja, R. (2023). Influence of Learners’ Diversity on the Pedagogical Practices in Engineering Education: A Meta-Analysis of Teachers’ Reflections. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(S2), 566–574. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36is2/23087 2. Casado-Aranda, L., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Montoro-Ríos, F., & Horcajadas, M. I. A. (2021). Evaluation of the Work-Integrated Learning Methodology: Teaching Marketing through Practitioner Experience in the Classroom. Mathematics, 9(17), 2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172164 3. Demirci, C., & Duzenli, H. (2017). Formative value of an active learning strategy: Technology based Think-Pair-Share in an EFL writing classroom. World Journal of Education, 7(6), 63. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n6p63 4. Dhamija, A., & Dhamija, D. (2020). Impact of innovative and interactive instructional strategies on student classroom participation. In IGI Global eBooks (pp. 20–37). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9304-1.ch002 5. Fauteux-Lefebvre, C. (2019). The impact of the classroom environment on the transition from the traditional model to the flipped classroom in a unit operation course. Proceedings of the . . . CEEA Conference. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.13754 6. Grant, J. B., & Grace, T. (2019). Use of diverse case studies in an undergraduate research methods and statistics course. Psychology, Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719828662 7. Hill, T., Paris, D., Nash, D. A., & Blau, G. (2020). Live-Problem Project v. Client-Based Project: Which Is Most Effective for Perceived Learning of MBA-Level Marketing Concepts? Journal of Education and Development, 4(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v4i3.806 8. Hou, H., Lo, Y., & Lee, C. (2020). Predicting Network Behavior Model of E-Learning Partner Program in PLS-SEM. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4656. a. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134656 9. Mohebi, L., ElSayary, A., & Meda, L. (2022). Teacher candidates’ perception of their first week school placement: Comparison between online and Face-To-Face practicum learnings and challenges. Perspektivy Nauki I Obrazovaniâ, 60(6), 598–611. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.6.36 10. Moreno-Guerrero, A., De Los Santos, P. J., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., & Costa, R. S. (2020). Bibliometric study of scientific production on the term collaborative learning in Web of Science. Sustainability, 12(14), 5649. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145649