Teaching assistants' competencies and the community of inquiry at an open distance learning institution
List of Authors
  • Setlhako, Motladi Angeline

Keyword
  • Teaching assistants, competencies, teaching presence, social presence, cognitive presence

Abstract
  • This paper reports on qualitative research conducted in one department at an Open Distance Learning Institution. The participants were 21 e-tutors/teaching assistants (TAs) who facilitated an online compulsory module for certificate and degree seeking students in Education called “Being a Professional Teacher (BPT)”. It is a bridging course aimed at students who wish to register for a degree in education for the first time. The TAs who facilitated the BPT programme had tacit assumptions about the pedagogy (classroom based) they would use in the online environment. To help both the TAs and their trainer, the researcher conducted this initial research with a focus on the skills/competencies needed by the TAs. Through the lens of competencies, it was possible to place the study within a larger inquiry into the question about their teaching practices in an online environment. Adaptation, modification and deconstruction of teaching practices require change, which takes time and reflection. In low context communication environments, such as an e-learning environment, that change is expected to be rapid. The rapidity of change is dependent on socio-cognitive and socio-affective development of the persons who must change. The TAs did adapt quite rapidly. The three presences needed for a Community of Inquiry to be successful, namely teaching, social and cognitive presences were indicated as developing through a discussion of the competencies the TAs started with, developed during the teaching of BPT and what they still needed to acquire in the future.

Reference
  • 1. Bawane, J. and Spector, J.M. (2009). Prioritization of Online Instructor Roles: Implications for Competency-Based Teacher Education Programs. Distance Education, 30(3): 383-397.
    2. Berge, Z.L. and Collins, M.P. (1995). Computer Mediated Communication and the Online Classroom, Volumes 1-3. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
    3. Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analyzing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11: 461-466.
    4. Clandinin, D. J., Huber, M., Huber, M.S., Murphy, A., Murray-Orr, M., Pearce, P. and Steeves. (2006). Composing diverse identities: Narrative inquiries into the interwoven lives of children and teachers. London: Routledge.
    5. Cleveland-Innes, M. and Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4): 269–292.
    6. Collins, M.P. and Berge, Z.L. (1996). Facilitating Interaction in Computer Mediated Online Courses. Proceedings of the FSU/AECT Conference on Distance Learning. June 20-23, Tallahassee: FL.
    7. Conceição, S. (2006). Faculty Lived Experiences in the Online Environment. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(1): 24 – 45.
    8. Cornelius, S. and C. Higgison. 2000. The tutor’s role. Online tutoring e-book, C.A. Higgison (ed). Retrived from http://otis.scotcit.ac.uk/onlinebook/otis-t2.htm.
    9. Cornelius, S. and Higgison, C. (2001). The Tutor’s Role and Effective Strategies for Online. OTiS, The Online Tutoring Skills Project. The Institute for Computer Based Learning. Edinburgh, UK: Heriot-Watt University Press.
    10. Dennis, B., Watland, P., Pirotte, S. and Verday, N. (2004). Role and competencies of the e-tutor. In Proceedings of the NetworkedLearning Conference. Distance Education, 9(4): 408–414.
    11. Derks, D., Fischer, A.H. and Bos, A.E. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3): 766–785.
    12. Develotte, C. (2009). From face to face to distance learning: the online learner’s emerging identity. Continuum: 71-92.
    13. De Vos, A.S., Strydom, H. C., Fouche, B. and Delport, C.S.L. (2012). Research at grass roots. For the Social Sciences and Human Service Professions. South Africa: Van Schaik, Fourth edition
    14. Diehl, W.C. (2016). Online instructor and teaching competencies: Literature review for Quality Matters. Retrived from (https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Online-Instructor-Teaching-Competencies-2016.pdf.
    15. Dirkx, J. (2008). The Meaning and Role of Emotions in Adult Learning. New Direction for Adult and Continuous Education, 120: 7 – 18.
    16. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T and Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1): 7–23.
    17. Garrison, D.R. and Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. A Framework for research and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
    18. Garrison, D.R., 1997. Self-Directed Learning: Toward a Comprehensive Model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48: 18-33.
    19. Garrison, B. (1998). Coping with New Technologies in the Newsroom
    20. Garrison, J. (2009). Teacher as Prophetic Trickster. Educational Theory, 59(1): 67-83.
    21. Gergen, K.J. (1995). Social Construction and the Transformation of Identity Politics. Retrived From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241334287_Social_Construction_and_the_Transformation_of_Identity_Politics.
    22. Goga, M. (2010). E-competencies of the Tutor in E-learning - A Comparative Study, Proceedings of International Conference on Software, Services and Semantic Technologies, 11-12, Varna, Bulgaria: 71-4: 63. Retrived from https://research.uni-sofia.bg/handle/10506/641 .
    23. Gunawardena, C., A. Nolla, A., Wilson, P., Lopez-lslas, J., Ramirez-Angel, N. and Megchun- Alpizar, R. (2002). A cross-cultural study of group process and development in online conferences. Distance Education, 22(1): 85–121.
    24. Gundykunst, W. B. (1997). Cultural Variability in Communication. An Introduction. Communication Research, 24(4): 327-348.
    25. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday
    26. Hanna, R.C., Weinberg, B., Dant, R.P. and Berger, P.D. (2005). Do internet-based surveys increase personal self-disclosure? Journal of Database Marketing and Customer Strategy Management, 12(4): 342.
    27. Harari, G.M., Lane, N.D., Wang, R., Crosier, B.S., Campbell, A.T. and Gosling, S.D. (2016). Using Smartphones to Collect Behavioral Data in Psychological Science: Opportunities, Practical Considerations, and Challenges. Perspective in Psychological Science, 11(6): 838–854.
    28. Harris, G. W. (1997). Dignity and Vulnerability: Strength and Quality of Character. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
    29. Hilke, J. (2010). Maryland Online, executive summary. In A “w” study, why do students take a course online? Why do they withdraw? Retrived from http://www.marylandonline.org/sites/default/files/WStudy%20Summary%20Report.pdf.
    30. Hinterberger, H. and Scheuner, B. (2012). E-Observation of E-Learning Removes the Guesswork from Didactic Analyses. In T. Bastiaens and G. Marks (Eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 616-624.
    31. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Maidenhead, U.K.: McGraw-Hill.
    32. Huizen, P., Oers B. and Wubbels T. (2005). A Vygotskian Perspective on Teacher Education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3): 267–90.
    33. Janus, M. and Bialystok, E. (2018). Working Memory with Emotional Distraction in Monolingual and Bilingual Children. Frontier Psychology, 9:1582.
    34. Kinsella, W.J. (ed.). (2008. Narratives, rhetorical genres, and environmental conflict: Responses to Schwarze’s “Environmental Melodrama”. Environmental Communication. A Journal of Nature and Culture, 2: 78-109.
    35. Ku, H-Y. and Lohr, L.L. (2003). A case study of Chinese student’s attitudes toward their first online learning experience, 51(3): 95-102.
    36. Libman, Z. and Zuzovsky, R. (2006). Standards of Teaching and Teaching Tests: Is This the Right Way to Go? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(1): 37-52.
    37. Liu, X., Liu, S., Lee, S.-h., and Magjuka, R.J. (2010). Cultural Differences in Online Learning: International Student Perceptions. Educational Technology and Society, 13 (3): 177–188.
    38. Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala Publications Inc. Boston: Massachusetts.
    39. Meho, L.I. (2006). E-Mail Interviewing in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10): 1284–1295.
    40. Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multi-method research design. In C. Teddlie, and A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
    41. Neal, J.W., Neal Z.P., Van Dyke, E. and Kornbluh, M. (2015). Expediting the Analysis of Qualitative Data in Evaluation: A Procedure for the Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio Recordings (RITA). American Journal of Evaluation, 36(1): 118-132.
    42. Pantić, N., Wubbels, T. and Mainhard, T. (2011). Teacher Competence as a Basis for Teacher Education: Comparing Views of Teachers and Teacher Educators in Five Western Balkan Countries. Comparative Education Review, 55(2): 165-188.
    43. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W. and Perry, R.P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37: 91-105.
    44. Pence, C.C. and Wulf, C. (2009). Asynchronous Learning Forums for Business Acculturation. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4): 319-329.
    45. Piaget, J. (1977). Epistemology and psychology of functions. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
    46. Pincott, G. and Branthwaite, A. (2000). Nothing new under the sun? International Journal of Market Research, 42(2): 137-155.
    47. Reid, D. (2002). A classification schema of online tutor competencies. In Proceedings of the Resource-Based Learning. London: Kogan Page. Retrived from http://www.learningpeaks.com/instrcomp.
    48. Resane, K.T. (2016). The socio-cultural functions of indigenous languages in teaching theology. Stellenbosch Theological Journal. 2(1): 363–379.
    49. Riley, R.B. (1992). Attachment to the Ordinary Landscape. Human Behaviour and Environment, 12: 13–35.
    50. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Taylor.
    51. Shank, P. (2004). Competencies for online instructors: Why have instructor competencies for online instructors? Retrived from http://www.learningpeaks.com/instrcomp.
    52. Schnell, J. (1990). Comparison of Faculty Dominance in U.S. and South African University Classrooms as It Relates to Cross-Cultural Relations. Educational Resources Information Centre.
    53. Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
    54. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. London: Jossey-Bass.
    55. Stenbom, S., Cleveland-Innes, M. and Hrastinski, S. (2016). Emotional presence in a relationship of inquiry: The case of one-to-one online math coaching. Online Learning, 20(1). Retrived from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/563.
    56. Stucki, R.A., Urwyler, P., Rampa, L., Müri, R., Mosimann, U.P. and Nef, T. (2014). A web- based non-intrusive ambient system to measure and classify activities of daily living. Journal of Medicine and Internet Research, 16(7): 175.
    57. Sutton, R.E. (2004). Emotional regulation goals and strategies of teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 7(4): 379−398.
    58. Sutton, R.E. and Wheatley, K.F. (2003). Teachers' Emotions and Teaching: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4): 327-358.
    59. Turbill, J., (2002). From face-to-face teaching to online distance education classes: some challenges and surprises. Retrived from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland02/proceedings/papers/127.pdf.
    60. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2005). Regional Guidelines on Teacher Development for Pedagogy-Technology Integration. Working Draft. Ed S Mujumdar. Bangkok: UNESCO.
    61. Varvel, V. (2007). Master online teacher competences. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Retrived from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring101/varvel101
    62. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    63. Westbrook, T.P. (2014). Global contexts for learning: Exploring the relationship between low- context online learning and high-context learners. Christian Higher Education, 13(4): 281-294.
    64. Wolff, D. (2003). Integrating language and content in the language classroom : Are transfer of knowledge and of language ensured ? Pratiques et recherches en Centres de langues, 41(4) : 35-46.
    65. Wood, R. and Power, C. (1987). Aspects of the competence-performance distinction: Educational, psychological, and measurement issues. Journal of Curricular Studies, 19: 409 - 424.
    66. Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2): 65-77.
    67. Yuksel, I. (2009). Instructor Competencies for Online Courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1): 1726–1729. Retrived from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.305.
    68. Zydney, J.M., de Noyelles, A. and Seo, K. K-J. (2012). Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Computers and Education, 58: 77 – 87.