The moderating role of gender between relationship closeness and online emotional cheating among young adults
List of Authors
  • Amabelle Ruth D. Carvajal , Dianne G. Flores

Keyword
  • Gender, Relationship closeness, Online emotional cheating

Abstract
  • Due to technological advancements, people now communicate easier. However, online communication also permits engagement with illegitimate partners and has the potential to harm relationships. Relationship closeness, on the other hand, has been anticipated as one of the crucial aspects of a romantic relationship. The Gender Schema theory posits that people assimilate constructs into gender categories which makes them behave in a “gender-appropriate” manner. With that, the study aimed to determine whether gender moderates the relationship between relationship closeness and online emotional cheating. Using the non-probability purposive sampling method, a total of 107 young adult participants from Metro Manila, consisting of 47 males and 60 females who are in long-term heterosexual relationship were obtained through online and face-to-face recruitment. The instruments used were Internet Infidelity Scale (IIS-44) and Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS). The results of the study indicated that there is no significant relationship between relationship closeness and emotional cheating (r = - 0.043, p > 0.05), and no significant relationship was found between gender and online emotional cheating (r = - 0.028, p > 0.05). Further, gender was identified as a non-moderator and has no significant effect on the association between relationship closeness and online emotional cheating (p > 0.05). The data provide new insights and falsify the commonly existing knowledge that relationship closeness is a significant factor in romantic relationships in committing online emotional cheating and that there were differences between men and women in terms of perceiving emotional cheating. Integrating these findings could serve as an expansion of knowledge and contribute to the collective effort of providing explanations in the significant complex changes and development in human behavior.

Reference
  • 1. Abbasi, I. S., & Alghamdi, N. G. (2017). When flirting turns into infidelity: The Facebook dilemma. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 45(1), 1-14. 2. Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press. 3. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. 4. Buss, D. M. (2018). Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 155-160. 5. Connolly, J., & McIsaac, C. (2009). Adolescents’ explanations for romantic dissolutions: A developmental perspective. Journal of adolescence, 32(5), 1209-1223. 6. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Childhood and society. London: Norton. 7. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton. 8. Darwin, C. R. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. 9. Dibble, J. L., Levine, T. R., & Park, H. S. (2012). The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): Reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 565–572. 10. Feist, J, Feist, G., & Roberts, T. (2018). Theories of Personality (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill International Editions. 11. Fricker, J. & Moore, S. (2005). A Closer Look at the Dimensionality of Infidelity and Its Predictors. Proceedings of the APS Psychology of Relationships Interest Group 5th Annual Conference, 71-75. 12. Hackathorn, J., & Ashdown, B. K. (2020). The webs we weave: Predicting infidelity motivations and extradyadic relationship satisfaction. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(2), 170-182. 13. Kato, T. (2021). Gender differences in response to infidelity types and rival attractiveness. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 36(4), 368-384. 14. Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Jordan, J., Pollmann, M., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological science, 22(9), 1191-1197. 15. Lantagne, A., & Furman, W. (2017). Romantic relationship development: The interplay between age and relationship length. Developmental Psychology, 53(9), 1738–1749. 16. Mattingly, B. A., Wilson, K., Clark, E. M., Bequette, A. W., & Weidler, D. J. (2010). Foggy Faithfulness: Relationship Quality, Religiosity, and the Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale in an Adult Sample. Journal of Family Issues, 31(11), 1465–1480. 17. Maxwell, G. M. (1985). Behaviour of Lovers: Measuring the Closeness of Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2(2), 215–238. 18. Nooripour, R., Abdi, M. R., Bakhshani, S., Alikhani, M., Hosseinian, S., & Ebrahim, T. P. (2017). Exploring validity and reliability of internet infidelity questionnaire among internet users in Iran. International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction, 6(1). 19. Norona, J. C. (2018). Breakups and Betrayals in Emerging Adulthood: A Developmental Perspective of Relationship Dissolution and Infidelity. 20. Norona, J. C., Olmstead, S. B., & Welsh, D. P. (2018). Betrayals in emerging adulthood: A developmental perspective of infidelity. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(1), 84-98. 21. Padian, K., & Horner, J. R. (2014). Darwin's sexual selection: Understanding his ideas in context. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 13(8), 709-715. 22. Porjorat, M. (2016). A comparative study of early maladaptive schemas in women with marital infidelity experience and those who didn’t have such an experience. Acta Medica International. 23. Starr, C. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2016). Sandra Bem’s Gender Schema Theory After 34 Years: A Review of its Reach and Impact. Sex Roles, 76(9–10), 566–578. 24. Syed, M., & McLean, K. (2017). Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development. 25. Tagler, M., & Jeffers, H. (2013). Sex differences in attitudes toward partner infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(4). 26. Vilar, R., Araujo, R., Coelho, G., Grangeiro, A., & Gouveia, V. (2017). Psychometric Properties of the Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS) for a Brazilian Sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20. 27. Weiser, D. A., Niehuis, S., Flora, J., Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., Arias, V. S., & Baird, R. H. (2018). Swiping right: Sociosexuality, intentions to engage in infidelity, and infidelity experiences on Tinder. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 29-33. 28. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Arnhold, V., & Connolly, J. (2014). Intercorrelations of intimacy and identity dating goals with relationship behaviors and satisfaction among young heterosexual couples. Social Sciences, 3(1), 44-59. 29. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Ducat, W. (2010). Positive and negative romantic relationship quality: Age, familiarity, attachment and well-being as correlates of couple agreement and projection. Journal of Adolescence, 33(6), 879–890.