Hubungan Amerika Syarikat dan China dengan Myanmar: satu analisis hubungan kuasa besar dengan negara kecil
List of Authors
  • Aini Fatihah Roslam , Nor Azizan Idris , Zarina Othman

Keyword
  • Amerika Syarikat, China, kepentingan strategik, Myanmar, negara kecil dan sistem antarabangsa

Abstract
  • Kelangsungan hidup sesebuah negara adalah penting bagi menjamin kedaulatannya dalam era globalisasi, era kebergantungan antara satu sama lain. Kedaulatan serta keselamatan adalah keutamaan negara agar terus merdeka dan aman makmur. Bagi negara Myanmar, kelangsungan hidupnya bukan sahaja ditentukan oleh faktor domestik, tetapi juga sistem antarabangsa. Myanmar adalah sebuah negara yang kaya dengan sumber asli, pernah dijajah oleh British dan mengamalkan sistem demokrasi (di awal kemerdekaan), serta bermasyarakat majmuk. Walau bagaimanapun, Myanmar tetap menjadi sebahagian daripada tumpuan dua kuasa besar dunia, iaitu Amerika Syarikat dan China walaupun sehingga kini masih berstatus negara miskin dan mempunyai pelbagai masalah dalaman terutamanya isu demokrasi dan konflik etnik. Hasil kajian menunjukkan Amerika Syarikat dan China mempunyai kepentingan tertentu yang menyebabkan kedua-duanya tetap tetap terus menjalinkan hubungan dengan negara Myanmar sebuah negara kecil dan lemah.

Reference
  • 1. Abdul Razak Baginda. (2007). Malaysia’s Foreign Policy: Continuity and Change. Shah Alam:Marshall Cavendish (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
    2. Abdul Monem M. Al-Mashat. (1985). National Security in the Third World. Colorado: Westview Press.
    3. Aini Fatihah Roslam, Nor Azizan Idris, & Zarina Othman. (2015). Pendekatan konstruktif ASEAN Myanmar: Sorotan kajian lepas. KRITIS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin, 1(1), 25-46.
    4. Aini Fatihah Roslam, Nor Azizan Idris dan Zarina Othman. (2018). Analisis Sekatan Bilateral Amerika Syarikat terhadap Myanmar. Geografia : Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 14 (3). pp. 101-115.
    5. Alistair D. B. Cook. (2012). Myanmar’s China Policy: Agendas, Strategies and Challenges.China Report. 48(269) : 269-281
    6. Amstrup, N. (1976). The Perennial Problem of Small States: A Survey of Research Effort, Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 11(3), hlm: 178
    7. Baldwind, Richard E. (1999). Market Integration Regionalism and The Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    8. Barston, R.P.(1973). The other Powers: Studies in the Foreign Policies of Small States, London: George Allen& Unwin Ltd.
    9. Bert, Wayne. (2004). Burma, China and The U.S.A. Pacific Affairs. 77(2): 263-282.
    10. Commonwealth Advisory Group. (1997). A Future for Small States: Overcoming Vulnerability. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
    11. Donald M. Seekins. (2005). Burma and U.S Sanctions: Punishing and Authoritarian Regime. Asian Survey. 45(3) May-June: 440.
    12. Hak Yin Li dan Yongnian Zheng. (2009). Re-interpreting China’s Non-intervention Policy towards Myanmar: Leverage, Interest and Intervention. Journal of Contemporary China. September 18(1) : 617-637.
    13. Haque, M.M. (2016).Temubual Bersemuka. Bilik Seminar Hotel Bangi-Putrayaja. [10 Disember].
    14. Haque, M.M. (2019).Temubual Bersemuka. Malaysia Airlines Lounge, Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Kuala Lumpur. [25 Julai]
    15. Jatswant S. Sidhu. (2009). Malaysia’s Defence and Security Since 1957: An Overview. Dlm. Abdul Razak Baginda. 2009. Malaysia’s Defence & Security Since 1957. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Strategic Research Centre.
    16. Jatswant S. Sidhu. (2004). Hubungan Myanmar-China: Dari Konfrontasi Ke Arah Kerjasama.
    17. John H. Badley. (2003). Strategic Interest in Myanmar. NBR Analysis. http://www.nbar.org. [20 Januari 2014].
    18. Jones, J. (2016). Temubual Bersemuka. Jabatan Hubungan Antarabangsa, Yangon University. [19 Mei]
    19. Kingsbury, Damien. (2001). South-east Asia: A Political Profile. Melbourne: Oxford University Press
    20. Kishan S. Rana. (2011). The Diplomacy of Small States. Dlm. Silviu Negut dan Andreea Gagea. 2011. Diplomacy In The Games Of Power. Romanian Review on Political Geography. 13 (1) Mei: 29 40
    21. Kipgen, N. (2015).Temubual bersemuka. Institut Kajian Malaysia dan Antarabangsa, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. [18 Ogos]
    22. Kudo, Toshiro. (2012). China’s Policy Toward Myanmar: Challenges and Prospect. IDE JETRO. http://www.ide.go.jp. [23 December 2013].
    23. Li Chenyang. (2010). Myanmar/Burma: Inside Challenges, Outside Interests. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
    24. Ma, M.M. (2016). Temubual bersemuka. Jabatan Hubungan Antarabangsa, Yangon University. [19Mei].
    25. Mariam Jensen. (2006). Income Volatility in Small and Developing Economies: Export Concentration Matters. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
    26. Michael F. Martin. (2012). U.S. Sanctions on Burma. Congressional Research Service. http://www.crs.gov. 7 Febuari, Hlm: 3 [28 Mac 2014].
    27. Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. (1962). Politics In The Twentieth Century, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    28. Mutebi, Alex M. (2005). Muddling Through Past Legacies Myanmar’s Civil Bureaucracy and the Need for Reform. Dlm. Kyaw Yin Hlaing, Robert H. Taylor dan Tin Maung Maung Than. 2005. Myanmar: Beyond Politics to Societal Imperatives. Singapore: ISEAS Publications.
    29. Nor Azizan Idris dan Zarina Othman. (2009). From ‘Non-Intereference’ to ‘Constructive Engagement:’ Contemporary Malaysia-Myanmar Relations, Tamkang Journal of International Affairs, Vol.7 (4): 1-43.
    30. Nye, Joseph S. (2003). Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History, New York: Longman.
    31. Pederson, Morton B.( 2005). The Challenges of Transitions in Myanmar. Dlm. Kyaw Yin Hlaing. (2005). Myanmar Beyond Politics to Social Imperatives. Singapura: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
    32. Progress Report of Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar. United Assembly. (2010). 13th Session of the Human Rights Council A/HRC/13/48. 10 Mac. http://daccess-dds- ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G10/119/15/PDF/G1011915.pdf? OpenElement, [29 Mac 2012]
    33. Soe, Maung Maung. (2017). The republic of union of Myanmar and the ASEAN and APT processes. In. Lee, Lai To, & Zarina Othman (Eds.). Regional community building in East Asia: Countries in Focus. New York, Routledge.
    34. Soh, Byungkuk. (2008). The Crisis of 1988 in Myanmar: A Watershed in the History of Myanmar Amerika Relations. International Area Studies Review. 11(2): 365-386.
    35. Steinberg, D. (2010). Burma/Myanmar: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    36. Sun,Yun. (2012). China’s Strategic Misjudgement on Myanmar. Jurnal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. 31(1). Hlm: 73-96
    37. Thomas Avery.(2011). Accountability in Burma: Movement Towards a UN Commission of Inquiry. Dlm. The Human Rights Brief: Centre for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, http://hrbrief.org/2011/02/accountability-in-burma-movement-towards-a-un-commission-of inquiry/ [23 Mac 2012].
    38. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2014). UNCTAD.
    39. Zan, Myint. (2015).Temubual bersemuka. Institut Kajian Malaysia dan Antarabangsa, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. [18 Ogos].