“I tell them, I tell them not”: disclosing one’s impairment in higher education
List of Authors
  • Alfa Nur Aini Erman Efendi , Muhamad Nadhir Abdul Nasir

Keyword
  • Disabled people, higher education, impairment disclosure, factorial matrix, qualitative comparative analysis

Abstract
  • Besides dealing with architectural and attitudinal barriers in higher education, disabled students also have to go through their identity formation as having some form of impairment resulting in their actions whether to disclose or not to disclose such information within various aspects of campus life. This article explores factors that influence one’s decision to disclose his or her impairment in higher education setting. We collect qualitative data from two groups of research participant. The first group consists of first year university students with various impairment at a public higher learning institution in Klang Valley, whereas the second group comprises of members of a Facebook group known as ‘Jalinan Mahasiswa OKU Malaysia’. Through qualitative comparative analysis, we uncover ten factors that influence one’s decision for impairment disclosure. Those factors are study course suitability, meritocracy, feeling towards one’s limitation, risk of discrimination, fulfilling one’s rights, risk of manipulation, facilities provision, responsibility, priority and thoughtfulness. These factors produce a complex matrix that needs to be managed effectively. We debate several issues arise relating to these factors. Our debate calls for critical interrogation of issues such as disability conception, individuals’ capabilities and the need for re-operationalizing the term ‘human rights’. We also advocate for further research on this matrix in different contexts of disabled people’s life such as during applying for a job, applying to participate in an event or training, and during applying for services or assistance schemes.

Reference
  • 1. Alshammari, S. (2017). A hybridized academic identity: Negotiating a disability within academia’s discourse of ableism. In Kerschbaum, S.L., Eisenman, L.T., & Jones, J.M. (eds), Negotiating disability: Disclosure and higher education. USA: University of Michigan Press.
    2. Barfield, J.P., Bennett, J., Folio, M.R., & Killman, C. (2007). Disability rights in higher education: Ensuring kinesiology program and accreditation standards do not discriminate. Quest, 59(4), 384-397.
    3. Barnard-Brak, L., & Sulak, T. (2012). The relationship of institutional distance education goals and students’ requests for accommodations. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25(1), 5-19.
    4. Boot, E.R. (2017). Human rights and limits of human rights discourse. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
    5. Carroll-Miranda, M.A. (2017). Access to higher education mediated by acts of self-disclosure: “It’s a hassle”. In Kerschbaum, S.L., Eisenman, L.T., & Jones, J.M. (eds), Negotiating disability: Disclosure and higher education. USA: University of Michigan Press.
    6. Carter, A.M., Catania, R.T., Schmitt, S., & Swenson, A. (2017). Bodyminds like ours: An autoethnographic analysis of graduate school, disability, and the politics of disclosure. In Kerschbaum,
    7. S.L., Eisenman, L.T., & Jones, J.M. (eds), Negotiating disability: Disclosure and higher education. USA: University of Michigan Press.
    8. Cawthon, S.W., & Cole, E.V. (2010). Postsecondary students who have a learning disability: Student perspectives on accommodations access and obstacles. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 23(2), 112-128.
    9. De Cesarei, A. (2014). Disclosure of disability by university students: Development of a study protocol. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 71-76.
    10. Faedah OKU Berdaftar dengan JKM. (2019, February 21). Retrieved from: http://pmr.penerangan.gov.my/index.php/component/content/article/202-bantuan-dan-subsidi kerajaan/8556-faedah-untuk-oku-berdaftar-dengan-jkm.html
    11. Gregg, B. (2012). Human rights as social construction. New York: Cambridge University Press. Hughes, B. (2007). Being disabled: Towards a critical social ontology for disability studies. Disability & Society, 22(7), 673-684.
    12. Hudson, R.L. (2013). The effect of disability disclosure on the graduation rates of college students with disabilities. (doctoral degree thesis). Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg.
    13. Kerschbaum, S.L., Eisenman, L.T., & Jones, J.M. (2017). Introduction: Disability, disclosure and diversity. In Kerschbaum, S.L., Eisenman, L.T., & Jones, J.M. (eds), Negotiating disability: Disclosure and higher education. USA: University of Michigan Press.
    14. Kerschbaum, S.L., O’Shea, A., Price, M., & Salzer, M.A. (2017). Accommodations and disclosure for faculty members with mental disability. In Kerschbaum, S.L., Eisenman, L.T., & Jones, J.M. (eds), Negotiating disability: Disclosure and higher education. USA: University of Michigan Press.
    15. Knight, A. (2017). Feminism, disability, and the democratic classroom. In Kerschbaum, S.L., Eisenman, L.T., & Jones, J.M. (eds), Negotiating disability: Disclosure and higher education. USA: University of Michigan Press.
    16. Konur, O. (2000). Creating enforceable civil rights for disabled students in higher education: An institutional theory perspective. Disability & Society, 15(7), 1041-1063.
    17. Nasir, M.N.A., & Efendi, A.N.A.E. (2019a). Arguing for the neo-biopsychosocial agenda: How does human rights fit in and which political paradigm to use?. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 344-352.
    18. Nasir, M.N.A., & Efendi, A.N.A.E. (2019b). Thematic analysis on the rights of disabled people to higher education. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 12(1), 8-17.
    19. Nasir, M.N.A., & Efendi, A.N.A.E. (2018). The dawn of a new episteme: Proposing the neo biopsychosocial understanding of disability. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 17(5), 26-34.
    20. Nasir, M.N.A., & Hussain, R.B.M. (2016). Kancah stigma dalam kalangan mahasiswa kurang upaya di sebuah universiti di Malaysia. Sarjana, 31(2), 71-87.
    21. Riddle, C.A. (2017). Human rights, disability and capability. New York: Springer.
    22. Riddell, S., & Weedon, E. (2011). Access to higher education for disabled students: A policy success story?. In Haines, S., & Ruebain, D. (eds.), Education, disability and social policy (pp. 131 146). Bristol: Policy Press.
    23. Samuels, E. (2017). Passing, coming out, and other magical acts. In Kerschbaum, S.L., Eisenman, L.T., & Jones, J.M. (eds), Negotiating disability: Disclosure and higher education. USA: University of Michigan Press.
    24. Snyder, J., Hopgood, S., & Vinjamuri, L. (2017). Human rights futures. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    25. Osiatynski, W. (2009). Human rights and their limits. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    26. Wood, T. (2017). Rhetorical disclosures: The stakes of disability identity in higher education. In Kerschbaum, S.L., Eisenman, L.T., & Jones, J.M. (eds), Negotiating disability: Disclosure and higher education. USA: University of Michigan Press