Improving English persuasive writing in Malaysia: A recommendation
List of Authors
  • Farous Izwan Abdul Aziz , Syahrul Nizam Salam

Keyword
  • Toulmin’s Model, persuasive writing, framework

Abstract
  • Persuasive writing is a complex form of written discourse, requiring the writer to justify his stance with a strong argument. The problems students experience when attempting persuasive writing include poor organization, lacking support in their arguments and immature language. The purpose of this paper is to recommend a model to help Malaysian secondary school students improve their persuasive essay writing. 150 students from three secondary schools in the Hulu Klang Area were selected for this study and instructed to submit an essay according to a set of writing prompts provided by the researcher. Toulmin’s Model was employed to analyse the essays by identifying the persuasive elements that were utilised by the students in their essays. The findings revealed that the students’ proficiency level significantly affected the persuasive writing features that they employ in their essays and the numerous factors encompassing teachers’ pedagogical approach, general knowledge and reading habits influenced the students’ persuasive writing ability. Hence, the recommendation put forth by this paper is to integrate Toulmin’s Model with classroom practice so that students should be able to master the structure of persuasive arguments which will subsequently improve their persuasive writing strategies and nurture their critical thinking skills.

Reference
  • 1. Amt, S. (2002). Fostering Persuasive Writing Through Out-of-the-Box Modeling. Stand. 2. Aziz, F. I. A., & Mat Said, S. B. (2020). Developing a Persuasive Writing Model for Secondary School. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 19(2), pp. 143-158. 3. Aziz, F. I. A., & Ahmad, U. K. (2017). Persuasive Writing: How Students Argue. Sains Humanika, 9(4-2), pp. 19-32. 4. Bipinchandra, J. S., Mohd Shah, P., Nor Puteh, S., Din, R., Rahamat, R., & Abd 5. Aziz, J. (2014). User Needs Analysis in Learning Argumentative Writing Via Mobile Platform. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, pp. 198-205. 6. Colovic-Markovic, J. (2019). " I Used Them Because I Had to...": The Effects of Explicit Instruction of Topic-Induced Word Combinations on ESL Writers. TESOL International Journal, 12(1), pp. 32-47. 7. Darus, S., & Khor, H. C. (2009). Common Errors in Written English Essays of Form One Chinese Students: A Case Study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), pp. 242-253 8. De Rycker, A., & Ponnudurai, P. (2011). The Effect of Online Reading on Argumentative Essay Writing Quality. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 11(3), pp. 147-162. 9. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), pp. 365-387. 10. Fei-Wen, C. (2010). A Socio-Cognitive Modeling Approach to Teaching English Argumentation. Asian ESP Journal, 6(1), pp. 120-146. 11. Fei-Wen, C., & Yueh-Miao, C. (2009). Taiwanese Argumentation Skills: Contrastive Rhetoric Perspective. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 1(1), pp. 23-50. 12. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the Writing Process Work: Strategies for Composition and Self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline. 13. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2018). Self-regulated Strategy Development: Theoretical Bases, Critical Instructional Elements, and Future Research. In Redondo, R. F., Harris, K. & Braaksma, M. (Eds), Design Principles for Teaching Effective Writing, Leiden, Netherlands, Brill Publishers. pp. 119-151 14. Hernandez, A., Kaplan, M. A., & Schwartz, R. (2006). For the Sake of Argument Educational Leadership. 64(2), pp. 48-52. 15. Hitchcock, D. (2017). Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model. In On Reasoning and Argument, pp. 371-387, Cham: Springer. 16. Igland, M. A. (2009). Negotiating Problems of Written Argumentation. Argumentation, 23(4), pp. 495-511. 17. Ignatius, H. (1999). English Academic Writing Features by Indonesian Learners of English. PhD thesis. State University of Malang, Indonesia. 18. Islam, M. A., Said, S. B. H. M., Umarlebbe, J. H., Sobhani, F. A., & Afrin, S. (2022). Conceptualization of head-heart-hands model for developing an effective 21st century teacher. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. 19. Johnson, D. R., Tynan, M. E., Cuthbert, A. S., & O’Quinn, J. K. (2018). Metacognition in Argument Generation: the Misperceived Relationship between Emotional Investment and Argument Quality. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), pp. 566-578. 20. Jovičić, T. (2006). The Effectiveness of Argumentative Strategies. Argumentation, 20(1), pp. 29-58. 21. Kaewpet, C. (2018). Quality of Argumentation Models. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(9), pp. 1105-1113. 22. Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing, 6(1). pp. 81-91. 23. Liu, D., & Wan, F. (2020). What makes proficient writers’ essays more persuasive? A Toulmin perspective. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(1), pp. 1-13. 24. Manz, E. (2015). Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent from Scientific Activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), pp. 553-590. 25. Nimehchisalem, V., & Mukundan, J. (2011). Determining the Evaluative Criteria of an Argumentative writing scale. English Language Teaching, 4(1), pp. 58-70. 26. Rafik-Galea, S., Zainuddin, S. Z., & Galea, P. V. (2008). Learning To Think Critically The Toulmin Way. 13th Seminar International Conference on Thinking. 2008. Sweden. 27. Rashid, S., & Chan, S. H. (2017). Exploring the Interplay of Mode of Discourse and Proficiency Level in Esl Writing Performance: Implications for Testing. The English Teacher, XXXVII, pp .105-122 28. Rachwan, L., & Nicolas, M. O. D. (2018). Perceptions of the Effects of Simulation Methodology on the Learning of English in a Remedial Level Course: A Case Study. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), pp. 12-27 29. Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., & Kuo, L. J. (2007). Teaching and Learning Argumentation. The Elementary School Journal, 107(5), pp. 449-472. 30. Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as they Learn Core Ideas. Science Education, 97(5), pp. 643-670. 31. Stambaugh, T. (2011). William and Mary for Beginners: Research Based Models. College of William and Mary: Centre for Gifted Education. 32. Stapleton, P. (2001). Assessing Critical Thinking in the Writing of Japanese University Students: Insights about Assumptions and Content Familiarity. Written Communication, 18(4), pp. 506-548. 33. Suhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The Effect of Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation within TWPS Strategy on Students’ Critical Thinking on Argumentative Essay. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(2), pp. 143-153. 34. Su-Hie, T., Rasli, H., & Leong-Jie, J. (2011). Case Study on Persuasiveness of Argument Texts Written by Proficient and Less Proficient. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, pp. 71-92. 35. Slusher, M. P., & Anderson, C. A. (1996). Using Causal Persuasive Arguments to Change beliefs and Teach New Information: The Mediating Role of Explanation Availability and Evaluation Bias in the Acceptance of Knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), pp. 110-122 36. Salies, T. G. (2002). Simulation / Gaming in the EAP Writing Class: Benefits and Drawbacks. Simulation & Gaming, 33(3), pp. 316-329. 37. Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press. 38. Tan, K. E. (2006). Writing English Essays Within Dominant Discourses in Malaysian Schools. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 21. pp 23-45. 39. Vikneswaran, T., & Krish, P. (2016). Utilising Social Networking Sites to Improve Writing: a Case Study with Chinese Students in Malaysia. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(3), pp. 287-300. 40. Wachsmuth, H., Stede, M., El Baff, R., Al Khatib, K., Skeppstedt, M., & Stein, B. (2018). Argumentation Synthesis Following Rhetorical Strategies. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 3753-3765. 41. Wingate, U. (2012). “Argument! ” Helping Students Understand What Essay Writing is About. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), pp. 145-154. 42. Yakob, S. B. (2015). Factors Effecting Students’ Writing Skills in Primary School Bachelor Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Mara. 43. Zainuddin, S. Z., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2016). Effects of Training in the Use of Toulmin’s Model on ESL Students’ Argumentative Writing and Critical Thinking Ability. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 5(2), pp. 112-131. 44. Zakaria, N. Y. K., & Hashim, H. (2020). Game-Based Assessment in Academic Writing Course for Pre-Service Teachers. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 65-73.