Analysis impact due to 3,5 GHz frequency spectrum implementation for 5G technology: The business valuation of satellite operator
List of Authors
  • Ageng Kharisma Putri , Imo Gandakusuma

Keyword
  • satellite, 5G, 3,5 GHz spectrum frequency, compensation

Abstract
  • Customer demands for higher data rates and lower latency demand technological evolution. Thus, driving the evolution of mobile technology from 4G to 5G. Mobile operators believed that 5G could offer high-speed internet networks for their users. However, due to the limited frequency spectrum, the Government needs to reallocate the frequency spectrum for the 5G implementation. One of the frequency spectrum candidates for the 5G implementation is the 3,5 GHz frequency spectrum. But, currently, this frequency is allocated for satellite as Extended C-Band. Satellite operators may no longer use Extended C-Band due to the interferences impacting the satellite operators' business. Satellite operators will suffer from losses since they lost their business opportunities. With frequency reallocation, it is necessary to provide fair compensation to satellite operators to avoid such losses under government regulations. This research contributes to formulation compensation for satellite operator to avoid loss in their business.

Reference
  • 1. Acker, O., Pötscher, F., & Lefort, T. (2020). Why satellites matter The relevance of commercial satellites in the 21st century–a perspective 2012-2020. Esoa.Net, 96. http://www.esoa.net/upload/files/news/Why Satellites Matter - Full Report.pdf
    2. APJII. (2020). Laporan Survei Internet APJII 2019 – 2020. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia, 2020, 1–146. https://apjii.or.id/survei
    3. Futron. (2013). “Geo Commercial Satellite Bus Operation: A Comparative Analysis”.
    4. Hobbs, S. (2018) “Valuing 5G Spectrum: Valuing the 3.5 GHz and C-Band Frequency Range”. Coleago Consulting.
    5. Kerrisdale Capital Management, LLC. (2018). Intelsat S.A. & SES S.A. To The Moon.
    6. KOMINFO. (2018) “Peraturan Menteri Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 Tentang Tabel Alokasi.Frekuensi Radio Indonesia”.
    7. Kominfo. (2000). PP No. 53 Tahun 2000.
    8. Kominfo. (2020). Spectrum Roadmap Mobile Broadband 2020 – 2024 Latar Belakang. 1–24.
    9. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Teknologi Bandung. (2018). “Spectrum Roadmap Mobile Broadband 2020-2024”. Focus Discussion Group (FGD)
    10. Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Mentri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 Tentang Tabel Alokasi Spektrum Frekuensi Radio Indonesia.
    11. Mustakim, H. U. (2019). Tantangan Implementasi 5G di Indonesia. INTEGER: Journal of Information Technology, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31284/j.integer.2019.v4i2.561
    12. Radio, A. H., & Management, R. (2018). 5G DENSE NETWORKS A Hierarchical Radio Resource Management Scheme. June, 2–9.
    13. Setiawan, B., & Aksah, R. L. O. (2017). Studi Kasus Perebutan Frekuensi 3600-4200MHz Antara Fixed Satellite Service Dan International Mobile Telecommunication Dengan Pendekatan Regulatory Impact Analysis. Jurnal Telekomunikasi Dan Komputer, 7(3), 267. https://doi.org/10.22441/incomtech.v7i3.1172