1. Abdullah, A. H., Mun, S. H., Mokhtar, M., Ashari, Z. M., Jumaat, N. F., Ali, D. F., Samah, N. A., & Abdurrahman, M. S. (2020). Using active learning with smart board to enhance primary school students’ higher order thinking skills in data handling. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4421–4432. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer. 2020.081009
2. Abdullah, A. H., Soh, H. M., Mokhtar, M., Hamzah, M. H., Ashari, Z. M., Ali, D. F., Samah, N. A., Jumaat, N. F., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., & Rahman, S. N. S. A. (2021). Does the Use of Smart Board Increase Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)? IEEE Access, 9, 1833–1854. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042832
3. Agarwal, S., & Kaushik, J. S. (2020). Student’s Perception of Online Learning during COVID Pandemic. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 87(7), 554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-020-03327-7
4. Alsofyani, M. M., bin Aris, B., & Eynon, R. (2013). A preliminary evaluation of a short online training workshop for TPACK development. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(1), 118-128.
5. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Online learning survey. Retrieved from: https://Online learning survey.com/reports/changing course.pdf.
6. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Online learning survey. Retrieved from: https://online learning survey.com/reports/online report card.pdf.
7. Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing the instructional design to improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. Journal of Physics: Conferenceseries, 812 (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001.
8. Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3):411–23. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
9. Anders, A. (2015). Theories and applications of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs): The case for hybrid design. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(6), 1–13.
10. Anwar, Y., Zen, D., & Permata, S. (2021). Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills of Biology Education Students Using Online Formative Assessment. 513, 14–17. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201230.076
11. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York:David McKay Co Inc.
12. Brown, M., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Brook, D. C., Grajek, S., Alexander, B., ... & Weber, N. (2020). 2020 Educause Horizon Report Teaching and Learning Edition (pp. 2-58). EDUCAUSE.
13. Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E. (2018). Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.004
14. Chang, H. Y., Wang, C. Y., Lee, M. H., Wu, H. K., Liang, J. C., Lee, S. W. Y., Chiou, G. L., Lo, H. C., Lin, J. W., Hsu, C. Y., Wu, Y. T., Chen, S., Hwang, F. K., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants’ perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.042
15. Chang, C. S., Chen, T. S., & Hsu, W. H. (2011). The study on integrating WebQuest with mobile learning for environmental education. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1228–1239.
16. Chatmaneerungcharoen, S. (2019). Improving Thai Science Teachers’ TPACK through an Innovative Continuing Professional Development Program. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012017
17. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Ho, H. N. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Examining preservice teachers’ perceived knowledge of TPACK and cyberwellness through structural equation modeling. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1000–1019. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.807
18. Chang, Y., Jang, S. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2015). Assessing university students’ perceptions of their Physics instructors’ TPACK development in two contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1236–1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12192
19. Del Arco, I., Flores, Ò., & Ramos-Pla, A. (2021). Structural model to determine the factors that affect the quality of emergency teaching, according to the perception of the student of the first university courses. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052945
20. Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2019). Exploring the Structural Relationship Among Teachers’ Technostress, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), Computer Self-efficacy and School Support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-11.
21. Dobi Barišić, K., Divjak, B., & Kirinić, V. (2019). Education Systems as Contextual Factors in the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 43(2), 163-183.
22. Edwards, M. C., & Briers, G. E. (2000). Higher order and lower order thinking skills achievement in secondary level animal science: Does block scheduling pattern influence end-of-course learner performance? Journal of Agricultural Education, 41 (4), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2000.04002.
23. Efriana, L. (2021). Problems of Online Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic in EFL Classroom and the Solution. Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 2(1), 38–47.
24. Esposito, M., & Zendrian, J. (2020). Blended Learning and TPACK: How Teachers Can Use the Method to Engage Students. EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 1060–1067. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217418/
25. Faizan, N., Gottlieb, M., Löffler, A., Utesch, M. C., & Krcmar, H. (2019). State-of-the-art to measure the TPACK level of trainees in higher education to increase the learnability of the train-the-trainer (TTT) Sessions (pp. 384-391). 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Dubai, UAE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON .2019.8725056
26. Fathi, J., & Yousefifard, S. (2019). Assessing language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): EFL students’ perspectives. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 7(2), 255-282. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2019.665888
27. Fensham, P . J., & Bellocchi, A. (2013). Higher order thinking in chemistry curriculum and its assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10 (2), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tsc.2013.06.003.
28. Fornell, C. and Lacker, D.(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18,.39-50.
29. Gefen, D., D. W. Straub, and M. C. Boudreau. 2000. Structural equation modelling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4:1–79. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.00407.
30. Gozukucuk, M., & Gunbas, N. (2020). Preservice Teachers’ Design of Technology–Based Reading Texts to Improve Their TPACK. Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.117 7/0022057420966763
31. Hacisalihoglu, G., Stephens, D., Johnson, L., & Edington, M. (2018). The use of an active learning approach in a SCALE-UP learning space improves academic performance in undergraduate General Biology. PLoS ONE, 13(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0197916
32. Hair, J. F., C. Ringle, M., and M. Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (2):139–52. doi: 10.2753/MTP10696679190202.
33. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squaress structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). London: Sage publications.
34. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
35. Hartati, S., & Fahrurrozi. (2021). The Effect of Self-Regulation and Creative Thinking Skills on the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (Tpack) Competencies of Early Childhood Teachers. Review of International Geographical Education, 1(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.
36. Hassan, N. F., & Puteh, S. (2017). A survey of technology enabled active learning in teaching and learning practices to enhance the quality of engineering students. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1104–1108. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7509
37. Henseler, J., & G. Fassott. 2009. Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures. In Handbook of partial least squares: Concept methods and applications, V. Esposito Vinzi, W.W. Chin,J. Henseler, and H. Wang, eds. Berlin: Springer.
38. Hwang, G. J., Yin, C., & Chu, H. C. (2019). The era of flipped learning: promoting active learning and higher order thinking with innovative flipped learning strategies and supporting systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 991–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1667150
39. Ilmi, A. M., Sukarmin, & Sunarno, W. (2020). Development of TPACK based-physics learning media to improve HOTS and scientific attitude. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012049
40. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95, 114–122.
41. Jang, S. J. & Chen, K. C. (2013). Development of an instrument to assess university students’ perceptions of their science instructors’ TPACK. Journal of Modern Education Review, 3, 10, 771–783.
42. Kang, X., & Zhang, W. (2020). An experimental case study on forum-based online teaching to improve student’s engagement and motivation in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817758
43. Kim, H. J., Yi, P., & Hong, J. I. (2020). Students’ academic use of mobile technology and higher order thinking skills: The role of active engagement. Education Sciences, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030047
44. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (pp. 3–29). Routledge.
45. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2015). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Pedagogical Improvement: Editorial for Special Issue on TPACK. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 459–462. https://doi.org/10.100 7/s40299-015-0241-6
46. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Natarajan, U. (2018). Developing Indonesia teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century learning (TPACK-21CL) through a multiprong approach. Journal of International Education and Business, 3(1), 11-33.
47. Koh, J. H. L. (2019). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 577-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423018-9627-5
48. Lawless, H. T., & Heymann, H. (2010). Descriptive Analysis. Sensory Evaluation of Food, 227–257. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5_10
49. Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4
50. Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2017). What affects learner’s higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors. Computers and Education, 115, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.015
51. Lee, M. H., Liang, J. C., Wu, Y. T., Chiou, G. L., Hsu, C. Y., Wang, C. Y., Lin, J. W., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). High School Students’ Conceptions of Science Laboratory Learning, Perceptions of the Science Laboratory Environment, and Academic Self-Efficacy in Science Learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09951-w
52. Lin, T. C., Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2013). Identifying Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.10 07/s10956-012-9396-6
53. Lin, H. M., Lee, M. H., Liang, J. C., Chang, H. Y., Huang, P., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). A review of using partial least square structural equation modeling in e-learning research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1354–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12890
54. Ilmi, A. M., Sukarmin, & Sunarno, W. (2020). Development of TPACK based-physics learning media to improve HOTS and scientific attitude. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012049
55. Major, C., & Mcdonald, E. (n.d.). And Developing Instructor TPACK: A Research Review and Narrative Synthesis. 2(2021), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.52547/johepal.2.2.51
56. Munyengabe, S., Yiyi, Z., Haiyan, H., & Hitimana, S. (2017). Primary teachers’ perceptions on ICT integration for enhancing teaching and learning through the implementation of One Laptop Per Child program in primary schools of Rwanda. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11), 7193–7204.
57. Molea, R., & Năstasă, A. (2020). How Romanian Higher Education Institutions Have Adapted to Online Learning Process in the COVID-19 Context through a Student’s Eye. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(2Sup1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.2sup1/304
58. Muianga, X. J., Barbutiu, S. M., & Hansson, H. (2019). Teachers´ perspectives on professional development in the use of SCL approaches and ICT: A quantitative case study of Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 15(2), 79-97.
59. Onah, D. F., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: Behavioural patterns. 6th International conference on education and new learning technologies. (pp. 5825–5834). University of Warwick Press
60.
61. Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14.
62. Pekdogan, S., & Kanak, M. (2016). A qualitative research on active learning practices in pre-school education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(9), 232-239.
63. Phanudulkitti, C., Farris, K. B., Makmee, P., & Kittisopee, T. (2018). Deep approach to learning of pharmacy students: A multilevel analysis. Pharmacy Education, 18, 99-109.
64. Pokhrel, T. R. (2018). Activity based mathematics instruction: Experiences in addressing the 21st-century skills. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 46-61.
65. Shih, C. L., & Chuang, H. H. (2013). The development and validation of an instrument for assessing college students’ perceptions of faculty knowledge in technology-supported class environments. Computers and Education, 63, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2012.11.021
66. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
67. Shroff, R. H., Ting, F. S. T., & Lam, W. H. (2019). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students’ perceptions of technology-enabled active learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4).
68. Styers, M. L., Zandt, P. A. Van, & Hayden, K. L. (2018). Active Learning in Flipped Life Science Courses Promotes Development of Critical Thinking Skills. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-11-0332
69. Revell, A. J., & Ayotte, B. J. (2020). Novel Approaches to Teaching Aging and Disability: Active Learning Through Design and Exploration. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 91(4), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020912944
70. Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers’ beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.002
71. Rillero, P. (2016). Deep conceptual learning in science and mathematics: Perspectives of teachers and administrators. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 14-31.
72. Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining Primary Education Teachers’ Perceptions of TPACK and the Related Educational Context Factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019. 1666323
73. Simpson, J., & Lindsey, N. S. (2020). Increasing faculty efficacy with targeted preparation for teaching online: A case study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 23(4). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter234/simpson_lindsey234.html
74. Smith, J. M., & Mancy, R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between meta-cognitive and collaborative talk during group mathematical problem solving-what do we mean by collaborative metacognition? Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 14-36. Doi:10.1080/14794802.2017.1410215.
75. Stone, M. 1974. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 36 (2):111–47. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x.
76. Sulaimani, A. O., Sarhandi, P. S. A., & Buledi, M. H. (2017). Impact of CALL in-house professional development training on teachers’ pedagogy: An evaluative study. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1355646
77. Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2011). Multiple intelligences profiling questionnaire. In Measuring Multiple Intelligences and Moral Sensitivities in Education (pp. 1-13). Brill Sense.
78. Tømte, C., Enochsson, A. B., Buskqvist, U., & Kårstein, A. (2015). Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online. Computers & Education, 84, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.005
79. Trzaskowski, S. A. (2019). Active Learning and its Impact on Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Preschool Science Education. Learning to Teach, 8(1).
80. Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2020). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455
81. Xie, F., Qin, C., & Xiao, Z. (2016, September). The Application of Undergraduates' Deep Learning Strategy on Network. In 2016 6th International Conference on Management, Education, Information and Control (MEICI 2016). Atlantis Press.
82. Zhao, J., & Qin, Y. (2021). Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support and Students’ Deep Learning: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and the Moderating Role of Perceived Peer Support. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(June), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2021.652796