The implications of integrated marketing communication in maintaining student relationship of a Malaysian public institution of higher education
List of Authors
  • Siti Aishah Chu Abdullah

Keyword
  • Integrated marketing communication framework, student relationship, Malaysian public institution of higher education, full range leadership theory, Malaysian public university in Penang

Abstract
  • Integrated marketing communication (IMC) is a business process that improves the higher education institutions’ marketing strategy by sending clear and consistent messages throughout the institutions in every contact point. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the strategic processes of IMC in the Malaysian public institution of higher education (IHE) and its correlation with leadership in maintaining student relationship. Quantitative analysis was performed to observe the level of IMC implementation and leadership styles exhibited in the selected Malaysian IHE. The IMC four-stage framework and seven dimensions of full range leadership theory, which comprises of transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership theory served as the basis of the study. The study found that the lecturers and administrative staffs of the Malaysian public university in Penang were adequately experienced in their job. They have also played their roles well by communicating with the students, and were thus respected, appreciated, and trusted by their students. Hence, they have created a strong emotional bond with the customer, and at the same time, maintained internal stakeholder relationships.

Reference
  • 1. Amir Sadeghi & Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie (2012). Transformational Leadership and its Predictive Effects on Leadership Effectiveness. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7): 186-197.
    2. Avolio, B. J. & Bass B. M. (1995). Individual Consideration Viewed at Multiple Levels of Analysis: A Multi-framework for Examining the Diffusion of Transformational Leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 188-218.
    3. Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industry, Military, and Educational Impact. In Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-analytic Test of Their Relative Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.
    4. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1992). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Includes Actual Form and Ought Form and Scoring Guide. Retrieved from www.mindgarden.com.
    5. Bennis, W. G. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper Business.
    6. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. In Levine, M. F. (2000). The Importance of Leadership: An Investigation of Presidential Style at Fifty National Universities (Doctoral Dissertation). University of North Texas, United States of America.
    7. Dawes, P. & Brown, J. (2002). Determinants of Awareness, Consideration and Choice Set Size in University Choice. In Horrigan, D. W. (2007). Integrated Marketing Communication in Higher Education (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Connecticut, United States of America.
    8. Edmiston, D. (2008). An Examination of Integrated Marketing Communication in US Public Institutions of Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 8(3/4): 152-175.
    9. Grönroos, C. (2004). The Relationship Marketing Process: Communication, Interaction, Dialogue, Value. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 19(2): 99-113.
    10. Hunt, J. G. & Schuler, R. S. (1976). Leader Reward and Sanctions: Behavior Relations Criteria in a Large Public Utility. In Levine, M. F. (2000). The Importance of Leadership: An Investigation of Presidential Style at Fifty National Universities (Doctoral Dissertation). University of North Texas, United States of America.
    11. Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-analytic Test of their Relative Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5): 755-768.
    12. Krejcie & Morgan (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30: 607-610.
    13. LeBlanc, G. & Nguyen, N. (1999). Listening to the Customer’s Voice: Examining Perceived Service Value Among Business Colleges. In Shah, M. & Nair, C. S. (2010). Enrolling in Higher Education: The Perceptions of Stakeholders. Journal of Institutional Research, 15(1): 9-15.
    14. Leuthesser, L. (1988). Defining, Measuring and Managing Brand Equity. In Wood, L. (2000). Brands and Brand Equity: Definition and Management. Management Decision, 38(9): 662-669.
    15. Madhavaram, S., Badrinarayanan, V. & McDonald, R. E. (2005). Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) and Brand Identity as Critical Components of Brand Equity Strategy. In Edmiston, D. (2008). An Examination of Integrated Marketing Communication in US Public Institutions of Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 8(3/4): 152-175.
    16. McPhillips, D. (2016). Best Countries for Education. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/malaysia.
    17. Mohayidin, M. G., Azirawani, N., Kamaruddin, M. N. & Margono, M. I., (2007). The Application of Knowledge Management in Enhancing the Performance of Malaysian Universities. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(3): 301-312.
    18. Ooi, T. C, Ho, H., & Amri, S. (2010). Education Websites and Their Benefits to Potential International Students: A Case Study of Higher Education Service Providers in Malaysia. Current Issues in Education, 13(1). Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/.
    19. PEMANDU (2013). Education (ETP Annual Report 2014). Retrieved from http://etp.pemandu.gov.my/annualreport2014/upload/12_NKEA10_ENG-Education.pdf.
    20. Ponsonby, S. & Boyle, E. (2004). The Value of Marketing and the Marketing of Value in Contemporary Times: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(3/4): 343-361.
    21. Schultz, D. E. (2004). IMC Receives More Appropriate Definition. Marketing News, 38(15): 8-9.
    22. Schultz, D. E. (2009). Solving Marketing Problems with an Integrated Process. International Journal of Integrated Marketing Communications, 1(1): 7-16.
    23. Schultz, D. E. & Schultz, H. F. (2004). IMC – The Next Generation: Five Steps for Delivering Value and Measuring Returns Using Marketing Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    24. Silverman, G. (1996) Silence of the Lambs. Far Eastern Economic Review, 14 November, 24-60.
    25. Sirat, M. (2008). The Impact of September 11 on International Student Flow into Malaysia: Lessons Learned. In Ooi, T. C, Ho, H., & Amri, S. (2010). Education Websites and their Benefits to Potential International Students: A Case Study of Higher Education Service Providers in Malaysia. Current Issues in Education, 13(1). Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/Szántó, S. & Harsányi, D. (2007, February). Integrated Marketing Communication in Higher Education? Paper Presented for EU Working Papers, Budapest, Hungary.
    26. The Research Advisors. (2006). Required Sample Size. Retrieved from http://www.research-advisors.com/tools/SampleSize.htm.
    27. University of Science, Malaysia. (2016, June 9). In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Science,_Malaysia.
    28. Wilkinson, R. & Yussof, I. (2005). Public and Private Provision of Higher Education in Malaysia: A Comparative Analysis. In Ooi, T. C., Ho, H. & Amri, S. (2010). Education Websites and their Benefits to Potential International Students: A Case Study of Higher Education Service Providers in Malaysia. Current Issues in Education, 13(1), 1-37. Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/.
    29. Wong, K.S. (2006). Branding a Malaysian Private College Through Integrated Marketing Communication: A Case Study (Doctoral Dissertation). Division of Business, University of South Australia.
    30. Ziguras, C. (2001). The effect of GATS on Transnational Higher Education: Comparing Experiences of New Zealand, Australia, Singapore and Malaysia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 30(3): 89-109.