Amalan kepimpinan transformasional dan hubungannya dengan motivasi guru sekolah jenis kebangsaan Cina di daerah Klang
List of Authors
  • Kimberley Ting Hie Ping , Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah

Keyword
  • Kepimpinan Transformasional, Motivasi, Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina

Abstract
  • Kajian ini bertujuan untuk meninjau amalan kepimpinan transformasional dan hubungannya dengan motivasi guru sekolah jenis kebangsaan cina di daerah Klang. Kajian ini dijalankan dengan menggunakan reka bentuk tinjauan. Data kajian ini diperolehi melalui kaedah borang soal selidik. Borang soal selidik telah diedarkan kepada guru-guru di seramai 21 buah sekolah jenis kebangsaan cina di daerah Klang. Persampelan rawak mudah digunakan dalam kajian ini. Data-data dianalisis dengan menggunakan statistik deskriptif (skor min dan sisihan piawai) dan statistik inferensi (korelasi). Dapatan kajian menunjukkan amalan kepimpinan transformasional yang diamalkan oleh guru besar mempunyai nilai min 4.56 (SP=0.19), iaitu berada pada tahap min yang tinggi. Min bagi tahap motivasi guru ialah 4.54 (SP=0.17), iaitu berada pada tahap min yang tinggi juga. Hasil analisis ujian korelasi Pearson digunakan untuk menentukan hubungan yang signifikan antara amalan kepimpinan transformasional dengan motivasi guru di sekolah jenis kebangsaan cina daerah Klang. Hasil dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara amalan kepimpinan transformasional dan motivasi guru (r=0.815, p<.001). Kesimpulannya, amalan kepimpinan transformasional banyak diamalkan oleh guru besar sekolah jenis kebangsaan cina daerah Klang. Implikasinya, amalan kepimpinan transformasional guru besar mampu meningkatkan motivasi guru supaya dapat meningkatkan kualiti kerja guru di sekolah.

Reference
  • 1. Adams, C.M. & Forsyth, P.B. (2014). Self-regulatory climate: A positive attribute of public schools.

    2. Afsar, B.F., Badir, Y., & Saeed, B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1270-1300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2014-0152

    3. Al-Amin. M. (2012). Pengaruh Peranan Transformasi Pengetua Terhadap Hubungan Antara Spiritualiti Dengan Komitmen Guru. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    4. Arokiasamy, A.R.A., Abdullah, A.G.K., Ahmad, M.Z., & Ismail, A. (2016). Transformational leadership of school principals and organizational health of primary school teachers in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.124

    5. Avolio, B.J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organisational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951-968.

    6. Balasubramanian, P., & Krishnan, V.R. (2012). Impact of gender and transformational leadership on ethical behaviors. Great Lakes Herald, 6(1), 48-58.

    7. Barnett, K., McCormick, J., & Conners, R. (2002). Transformational leadership in schools – Panacea, placebo, or problem? Journal of Educational Administration, 39(1), 24-46.

    8. Barnett, K. & McCormick, J. (2003). Vision, relationships and teacher motivation: a case study. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 55-73.

    9. Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan.

    10. Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage.

    11. Bass, and Ruth (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Managerial Application, (4th ed). New York: Free Press.

    12. Brinson, D. & Steiner, L. (2007). Building Collective Efficacy: How leaders inspire teachers to achieve. Issue Brief: The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.

    13. Eres, F. (2011). Relationship between teacher motivation and transformational leadership characteristics of school principals. International Journal of Education, 3(2), E4.

    14. Eyal. O., Roth. G. (2010). Principals’ Leadership and Teachers’ Motivation. Journal of Educational Administration, 256–75.

    15. Eyal, O., & Roth, G. (2011). Principals' Leadership and Teachers' Motivation: Self-Determination Theory Analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129055

    16. Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform, Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228-256.

    17. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). NewYork John Wiley.

    18. Hoy, A.W. (2008). What motivates teachers? Important work on a complex question. Learning and Instruction, 18, 492-498.

    19. Kappen, F. (2010). Leadership and motivation: How leadership-styles contribute to employees’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. (Unpublished bachelor degree’s thesis). Tilburg University.

    20. Kementerian Muridan Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013- 2025. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.

    21. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia2013-2025. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Diperoleh daripada: https://www.moe.gov.my/muat-turun/penerbitan-dan-jurnal/1818-pelan- pembangunan-pendidikan-2013-2025

    22. Kent, T.W., Blair, C.A., Rudd, H.F., & Schuele, U. (2010). Gender differences and transformational leadership behavior: Do both German men and women lead in the same way. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(1), 52-66.

    23. Knights D., & Willmott H. (2012). Introducing organisational behaviour and management. Andover, Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning EMEA.

    24. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research Activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

    25. Kyak, M., Bozaykut, T. Gengur, P. Aktas, E. (2011). Strategic Leadership Style and Organization Financial Performance: A Qualitative Study on Private Hospitals, Procedia-Social and Behavioural Science. 24: 1521-1529

    26. Lai, E., & Han, C. G. K. (2020). Hubungan Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Iklim Sekolah dengan Motivasi Guru Hubungan Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Iklim Sekolah dengan Motivasi Guru Abstrak The Relationship of Principals ’ Leadership and School Climate with Teachers ’. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Volume 3, Issue 2, (Page 1 - 16), 2018.

    27. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451-479. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.10.4.451.3495

    28. Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 177-199.

    29. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829

    30. Mahzan, F. A., & Nordin, N. M. (2021). The Relationship between Transformational Leadership Practiced and the Level of Job Satisfaction among Lecturers in MARA Professional College, Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 2021

    31. Mustafa, M.N., & Othman, N. (2016). The effect of work motivation on teacher’s work performance in pekan baru senior high schools, Riau Province, Indonesia. Sosiohumanika, 3(2), 65-72.

    32. Mukhtar, A., & Fook, C. Y. (2020). The Effects of Perceived Leadership Styles and Emotional Intelligence on Attitude toward Organizational Change among Secondary School Teachers. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 2020.

    33. Munian, S., & Hasan, S. (2020). Hubungan Antara Kepimpinan Transformasi Guru Besar dengan Komitmen Kerja dalam kalangan Guru Sekolah Rendah di Daerah Kulim Bandar Baharu, Kedah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(6), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i6.434

    34. Northouse, P.G. (2012). Transformational Leadership. In L. Shaw (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and Practice (pp. 185-217). New York, NY: Sage.

    35. Nurul Jalilah Abdul RahmanAbdul Rahman (2013). Pengaruh gaya kepimpinan transformasional guru besar terhadap tahap motivasi kerja guru di sekolah menengah zon bandar segamat. Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

    36. Robbins (2005), Organizational Behaviour, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson, Prentice Hall

    37. Robins, P. Stephen. (2010) Organizational Behaviour. Ninth Edition, (New York: McGraw-Hill.

    38. Roslan, Y. (2006). Kesan Kepimpinan Transformasional Pengetua Terhadap Keupayaan Guru Kepimpinan, Guru di Dua Buah Sekolah di Pulau Pinang. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

    39. Sheldon, K.M., Elliott, A.J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2003). What’s satisfying about satisfying events? Comparing ten candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 152-165.

    40. Shufaryinie Abd Shukor (2016). Hubungan kepimpinan guru besar dengan tahap motivasi kerja guru-guru gen-y di sekolah-sekolah menengah kebangsaan dalam daerah temerloh. Tesis: Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

    41. Somech A., (2005). Directive Versus Participative Leadership: Two Complementary Approaches to Managing School Effectiveness. Education Administration Quarterly, 41 (5), 777–800.

    42. Tschannen-Moran, M. & Hoy, A.W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.

    43. Walumba, F.O., Wang, P., Lawler, J.J. & Shi, K. (2004). The role of collective efficacy in the relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 515-530.

    44. Wang, X.-H., & Howell, JM (2010). Exploring the Dual-Level Effects of Transformational Leadership on Followers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (6), 1134–1144.

    45. Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.