The relationship between knowledge characteristics and the effectiveness of cross-border knowledge transfer - a case in Japanese firms
List of Authors
  • Shankar Chelliah , Wong Mei Foong

Keyword
  • cross-border knowledge transfer, knowledge characteristics, learning intent, Japanese business affiliates

Abstract
  • This research is aimed at studying the effectiveness of cross-border knowledge transfer from Japanese companies to their business affiliates in Northern Malaysia by looking into knowledge characteristics and the mediating effect of the business affiliates’ learning intent. By focusing on attributes identified by existing literature, there were 4 aspects being investigated to study how they influence the effectiveness of cross-border knowledge transfer, namely embeddedness, articulateness, acquired explicit know-how, and acquired tacit know-how, as well as how the business affiliates’ learning intent mediates the relationship between these aspects and the effectiveness of cross-border knowledge transfer. After forming hypothesis, questionnaire for this study was developed by adopting elements from existing literature and was then submitted for pre-test to reduce ambiguity and other potential issues. Data was collected and analysed after receiving returned questionnaires that were sent to Japanese’s business affiliates in Northern Malaysia through mail post. The results indicate that knowledge characteristics such as the embeddedness, articulateness, acquired explicit and tacit know-how are positively related to the effectiveness of cross-border knowledge transfer, and that the business affiliates’ learning intent significantly mediates the relationship between knowledge characteristics and the effectiveness of cross-border knowledge transfer. The result of this study could provide business practitioners a deeper insight about improving knowledge transfer by focusing on the attributes that would make the transfer of knowledge more easily and effective, in which could help to reduce costs, and to save time and resources. Last but not least, this study also contributes to the literature of knowledge transfer for its findings on the mediating effect of learning intent.

Reference
  • 1. Balland, P., & Rigby, D. (2017). The Geography of Complex Knowledge. Economic Geography, 93(1), 1–23.

    2. Barley, W. C., Treem, J. W., & Kuhn, T. (2018). Valuing multiple trajectories of knowledge: A critical review and agenda for knowledge management research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 278–317.

    3. Ben-Ari, E. (2017). Japanese Encounters: The Structure and Dynamics of Cultural Frames. Routledge.

    4. Borneo Post Online. (2019, January 18). Malaysia-Japan ties to soar to new heights with Look East Policy 2.0. Retrieved from https://www.theborneopost.com/2019/01/18/malaysia-japan-ties-to-soar-to-new-heights-with-look-east-policy-2-0/

    5. Bretz, R. D., Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (1993). Recruiter perceptions of applicant fit: Implications for individual career preparation and job search behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior.

    6. Brookes, M., & Altinay, L. (2017). Knowledge transfer and isomorphism in franchise networks. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 62, 33–42. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.11.012

    7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd edn.

    8. Cornell University, INSEAD, & World Intellectual Property Organization. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation.

    9. Embassy of Japan in Malaysia. (2018). Background of the Look East Policy. Retrieved from https://www.my.emb-japan.go.jp/English/JIS/education/LEP.htm

    10. Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., & Scuotto, V. (2018). Dual relational embeddedness and knowledge transfer in European multinational corporations and subsidiaries. Journal of Knowledge Management.

    11. Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2018). Heuristics Versus Statistics in Discriminant Validity Testing: A Comparison of Four Procedures. Internet Research, Forthcoming.

    12. Garcia, G. (2016). Japanese Cultural Traditions and International Business. In International Business: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1254–1274). IGI Global.

    13. Garrick, J., & Chan, A. (2017). Knowledge management and professional experience: the uneasy dynamics between tacit knowledge and performativity in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(4), 872–884.

    14. Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23–30.

    15. Gupta, A., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations [Electronic version]. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473–496.

    16. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0024630113000022

    17. Hau, L. N., & Evangelista, F. (2007). Acquiring tacit and explicit marketing knowledge from foreign partners in IJVs. Journal of Business Research, 60(11), 1152–1165.

    18. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

    19. Hu, B. (2014). Linking business models with technological innovation performance through organizational learning. European Management Journal, 32(4), 587–595. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.10.009

    20. Khamseh, H. M., & Jolly, D. R. (2008). Knowledge transfer in alliances: Determinant factors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 37–50.

    21. Khan, Z., Lew, Y. K., & Marinova, S. (2019). Exploitative and exploratory innovations in emerging economies : The role of realized absorptive capacity and learning intent. International Business Review, 28(3), 499–512. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.11.007

    22. Kim, B., Kim, M., & Kim, E. (2017). Characteristics of codified knowledge and replication-imitation speed differentials. Management Decision, 55(8), 1785–1801.

    23. Meier, M. (2011). Knowledge Management in Strategic Alliances: A Review of Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 1–23.

    24. Ministry of Finance Japan. (2018). Japan Direct Investment Flows 2018C.Y. Retrieved from https://www.mof.go.jp/english/international_policy/reference/balance_of_payments/ebpfdii.htm

    25. Mohamad, M. bin. (2002). Look East Policy - The Challenges for Japan in a Globalized World.

    Speech by H.E. Dato’ Seri Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/malaysia/pmv0212/speech.html

    26. Montshiwa, V. T., & Moroke, N. D. (2014). Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of Student-Lecturer Evaluation Questionnaire: A Case of North West University. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(14), 352–364. Retrieved from http://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/3163

    27. Nielsen, B. B. (2005). The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 58(9 SPEC. ISS.), 1194–1204.

    28. Niesten, E., & Stefan, I. (2019). Embracing the Paradox of Interorganizational Value Co-creation–Value Capture: A Literature Review towards Paradox Resolution. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(2), 231–255.

    29. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2015). The Knowledge-creating Theory Revisited: Knowledge Creation as a Synthesizing Process. In The Essentials of Knowledge Management (pp. 95–110). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    30. Park, B. Il. (2011). Knowledge transfer capacity of multinational enterprises and technology acquisition in international joint ventures. International Business Review, 20(1), 75–87. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.06.002

    31. Pérez-Nordtvedt, L., Kedia, B. L., Datta, D. K., & Rasheed, A. A. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency of cross-border knowledge transfer: An empirical examination. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 714–744.

    32. Peter, S., & Patricia, O. P. (2006). Transnational corporations and strategic challenges: An analysis of knowledge flows and competitive advantage. The Learning Organization, 13(6), 544–559.

    33. Pook, A. S. Y., Chong, C. W., & Yuen, Y. Y. (2017). Effectiveness of cross-border knowledge transfer in Malaysian MSC status corporations. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 9(1), 90–110.

    34. Rahman, M. S., Mannan, M., Hossain, M. A., Zaman, M. H., & Hassan, H. (2018). Tacit knowledge-sharing behavior among the academic staff: Trust, self-efficacy, motivation and Big Five personality traits embedded model. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(5), 761–782.

    35. Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Assessment of Reflective Measurement Models. In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0 (pp. 81–106). Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.

    36. Ritala, P., Husted, K., Olander, H., & Michailova, S. (2018). External knowledge sharing and radical innovation : the downsides of uncontrolled openness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(5), 1104–1123.

    37. Røvik, K. A. (2016). Knowledge Transfer as Translation: Review and Elements of an Instrumental Theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 290–310.

    38. Saini, M., Arif, M., & Kulonda, D. J. (2018). Critical factors for transferring and sharing tacit knowledge within lean and agile construction processes. Construction Innovation, 18(1), 64–89.

    39. Simonin, B. L. (2004). An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 407–427.

    40. Takpuie, D., & Tanner, M. (2016). Investigating the characteristics needed by scrum team members to successfully transfer tacit knowledge during agile software projects. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 19(1), 36–54. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313106705

    41. Wang, P., Tong, T. W., & Koh, C. P. (2004). An integrated model of knowledge transfer from MNC parent to China subsidiary. Journal of World Business, 39(2), 168–182.

    42. Welch, L. S. (2015). The emergence of a knowledge-based theory of internationalisation. Prometheus (United Kingdom), 33(4), 361–374. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2016.1207874

    43. Winship, C., & Zhuo, X. (2018). Interpreting t-Statistics Under Publication Bias: Rough Rules of Thumb. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1–18.