Meiji modernizers and turkish reformers’ quest of modernism: A comparative analysis
List of Authors
  • Mohamad Firdaus Mansor Majdin

Keyword
  • Meiji modernizers, Turkish reformers, modernization

Abstract
  • This paper attempts to address the process of modernization of two emerging Asian powers, namely Japan and Turkey, with a particular reference to efforts of two notable Meiji modernizers (Okubo Toshimichi and Kido Takayoshi) in Japan and Turkish reformers (Mustafa Resid Pasha and Mehmed Fuad Pasha) in Turkey respectively in modernizing and reforming the countries. At the expense of growing Western political and economic interests in the countries, the countries’ leadership realized a drive towards change and transformation must be realized and institutionalized. In doing so, they found the models in the West through which they could emulate and implement them in their countries. Using content-textual analysis, sources for this analysis will be taken from a wide range of published scholarly works written by Turkish, Japanese, and Western writers as well as some relevant archival documents. In the end, the paper suggests that the ability of Japanese and Turkish statesmen to adapt and adopt foreign practices which were later infused with local circumstances proven to be instrumental in their quest of modernizing their respective countries by their rights despite the setbacks they had to face in doing so.

Reference
  • 1. Abdu-Manneh, Butrus. (1994). The Islamic roots of the Gulhane rescript. Die Welt des Islams, 34(2),192. 2. Adams, F. O. (1875). The history of Japan. London: Henry S. King & Co. Vol. II 3. Akgun, Secil. K. (199). The emergence of Tanzimat in the Ottoman empire. Turkey: Ankara University, 1991. Retrieved from dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/19/834/10541.pdf. 4. Akita, G. (1967). Foundations of constitutional government in modern Japan 1868-1900. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 5. Ardic, Nurullah. (2012). Islam and the politics of secularism: The caliphate and middle eastern modernization in the early 20th century. Routledge: London. 6. Beasley, W. G. (1973). The Meiji restoration. London: Oxford Univ. Press. 7. Beasley, W. G. (1963). The modern history of Japan. Tokyo: Charles E. Turtle. 8. Berkes, Niyazi. (1998). The development of decularism in Turkey. Hurst, London. 9. Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopedia. Okubo Toshimichi. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Okubo-Toshimichi 10. Brown, Alexander D. (2005). Meiji Japan: A unique technological experience. Student Economic Review, 19, 71-83. 11. Chowdhury, R. (2011). Pan-Islamism and modernisation during the reign of Sultan Abdülhamid II, 1876-1909 [Unpublished Ph.D. thesis]. McGill University. 12. Cifci, Yusuf. Modernisation in the tanzimat period and the Ottoman empire: An analysis of the tanzimat edict within the scope of the modern state. International Journal of Social and Humanistic Sciences 2(2), 18. 13. Cobbing, A., Ohta, A., Checkland, O, and Breen, J. (1998). The Iwakura mission in Britain,1872. London: STICERD, London School of Economics, 1998. 14. Craig, Albert M. (2014). The Central Government. In M. B. Jansen and Gilbert Rozman (Eds.), Japan in transition From Tokugawa to Meiji (pp. 36-67) New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 15. Davison, Roderic. H. (1954). Turkish attitudes concerning Christian-Muslim equality in the nineteenth century. The American Historical Review, 59(4), 844-864. 16. Devere, B. Sidney. (1962). Okubo Toshimichi: His political and economic policies in early Meiji Japan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 21(2), 183-197. 17. Devere, Brown, Sidney. (1956). Kido Takayoshi (1833-1877): Meiji Japan’s cautious revolutionary. Pacific Historical Review, 25(2), 151-162. 18. Dore, Ronald, P. (Ed.). (1973). Aspects of social change in modern Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 19. Flottman, Augustus. (2012). The Meiji education system: Developing the emperor’s ideal subject [Undergraduate honours thesis, The University of Colorado]. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/undergraduate_honors_theses/cv43nx25n 20. Findley, Carter V. (1980). Bureaucratic reform in the Ottoman empire: The sublime porte, 1789-1922. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 21. Goldschmidt Jr. Arthur & Davidson, Lawrence. (2006). A concise history of Middle East. New York: Avalon Publishing. 22. Goodwin, K. (2006). The tanzimat and the problem of political Authority in the Ottoman Empire 1839-1876. [History honor thesis, Rhode Island College]. https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/honors_projects/5. 23. Gubbins, J. H. (1992). The making of modern Japan. London: Seeley, Service & Co. Ltd. 24. Hanigolu, M. Sukru. (2008). A brief history of the late Ottoman empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 25. Heper, M. (1980). Center and periphery in the Ottoman empire: With special reference to the nineteenth Century. International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 1(1), 81–105. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1600742 26. Ihsanoglu, Ekmeleddin. Ottoman Educational Institutions During the Reform Period. Manchester: Foundation for Science, Technology, and Civilisation, 2004. 27. Inalcik, Halil. (1995). From empire to republic: Essays on Ottoman and Turkish social history. Turkey: Isis Press. 28. Itzkowitz, Norman. (1972). Ottoman empire and Islamic traditions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 29. Jansen, M. B. (1980). Japan and its world: Two Centuries of Change. Princeton University Press. 30. Jansen, B. Marius. (1983). The Meiji modernizers. In Clark L. Beck & Ardath W. Burks (Eds.), Aspects of Meiji modernisation: The Japan helpers and the helped (pp. 11-39). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. 31. Jansen, M. B. The Cambridge History of Japan: The Nineteenth Century. Vol. 5. Cambridge University Press, 1989. 32. Jansen, M. B. (1989). The Cambridge History of Japan. vol. 5: The Nineteenth Century (Vol. 5). Cambridge University Press. 33. Jenkins, David. (1869, February 22). Death of Fuad Pasha. The Aberystwith Observer. Retrieved from https://newspapers.library.wales/view/3038946/3038949/27 34. Karpat, Kemal H. (2001). The politicization of Islam: Reconstructing identity, state, faith, and community in the late Ottoman state. New York: Oxford University Press. 35. Keene, D. (2005). Emperor of Japan: Meiji and his world, 1852-1912. Columbia University Press: New York. 36. Kinross, Lord. (1977). The Ottoman centuries: The rise and fall of the Turkish empire. New York: Perennial. 37. Lehmann, Jean-Pierre. (1982). The roots of modern Japan. Palgrave Macmillan. 38. Lewis, Bernard. (1961). The emergence of modern Turkey. London: Oxford University Press. 39. Maki, John M. (1983). The Japan helpers. In Clark L. Beck and Ardath W. Burks (Eds.), Aspects of Meiji modernisation: The Japan helpers and the helped (pp. 21-39). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. 40. Mardin, Serif. (1961). Some notes on an early phase in the modernization of communications in Turkey. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 3(3), 266. 41. Mardin, Serif. (1995). Tanzimat. In John Esposito (Ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World. Vols. 1-4 (pp. 56) New York: Oxford University Press. 42. Martin, Richard, C. (2004). Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim world. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan Reference. 43. Mazanec, Jakub. (2016). The Ottoman empire at the beginning of reform. Prague Papers on the History of International Relations, 2, 21-45. Retrieved from http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-afee3c94-f854- 44a4-a156-2f0c3e0aabdc. 44. Michio Nagai. M. (2005). Westernization and Japanization: The early Meiji transformation of education. In Donald H. Shively (Ed.), Tradition and modernization in Japanese culture (pp. 53-94). New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2005. 45. Norman, E. H. (1940). Japan’s emergence as a modern state: Political and economic problems of the Meiji period. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations. 46. Obispo, Joanna Luisa. (2017). Japan’s fukoku Kyohei: A continuous pursuit of economic and military powers. Ugong,9, 56-80. 47. Ohno, Kenichi. (2013). Learning to industrialize: From given growth to policy-aided value creation. London: Routledge. 48. Ohno, K. (2019). Meiji Japan: Progressive learning of western technology. In Arkebe Oqubay and Kenichi Ohno (Eds.), How nations learn: Technological learning, industrial policy, and catch-up (pp. 85-106). Oxford University Press 49. Ohno, Kenichi. (2018). The history of Japanese economic development: Origins of private dynamism and policy competence. Routledge. 50. Oka, Yoshitake. (1986). Five political leaders of modern Japan: Ito Hirobumi, Okuma Shigenobu, Hara Takashi, Inukai Tsuyoshi, and Saionji Kimmochi (Andrew Fraser & Patricia Murray, Trans.). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press. 51. Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances M. (1995). The politics of oligarchy: institutional choice in imperial Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press. 52. Sahin, Sehriban. (2006). Social theory and later modernities: The Turkish experience. International Sociology Review of Books, 21(3), 223-237. 53. Stanford J., Shaw & Ezel Kural Shaw. (1977). History of the Ottoman empire and modern Turkey: Reform, revolution, and republic. Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press. 54. Stanford, J. S. (1970). The central legislative councils in the nineteenth century Ottoman reform movement before 1876. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 1(1), 57. 55. Shively, Donald, H. (1971). The Japanization of the middle Meiji. In Donald H. Shively (Ed.), Tradition and modernization in Japanese Culture (pp. 92-138). New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 56. Soviak, Eugene. (1971). On the nature of western progress: The journal of the Iwakura embassy.” In Donald H. Shively (Ed.), Tradition and modernization in Japanese Culture (pp. 25-52). New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 57. Takii, K., Manabu, T., Murray, P., & Fister, P. (2014). Ito Hirobumi Japan's first prime minister and father of the Meiji Constitution. Routledge. 58. Theodore De Bary, W., Ryusaku Tsunoda, R., Keene, D. (1964). Sources of Japanese tradition. (Vol. 2). Columbia University Press: New York. 59. Weiker, Walter F. (1968). The Ottoman bureaucracy: Modernization and reform. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 451-470. 60. White, Marilyn Domas & Marsh, Emily E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/3670