Self-esteem, social and affective outcomes of students with special educational needs in tertiary education
List of Authors
  • Hoi Nga NG , Kam Weng BOEY

Keyword
  • Global Self-Esteem, Tertiary Education, Psychological Distress, Social Relationship Special Educational Needs

Abstract
  • The core values of inclusive education (IE) proclaim to provide equal educational opportunities to all students regardless of disabilities or special educational needs (SEN). Nonetheless, there were no consistent indications that IE was beneficial to students with SEN. Despite lacking solid evidence for the efficacy of IE, more and more students with SEN completed their secondary education and pursue their studies in tertiary education. This study was conducted in an institute of tertiary education to investigate psychosocial outcomes of inclusive practice. A total of 91 students with special educational needs participated in this study. Validated outcome measures of global self-esteem, social relationship, and psychological distress were incorporated in a questionnaire for online data collection. Results showed that students with SEN were able to maintain good social relationship with their peers, but their global self-esteem was significantly lower and their psychological distress was higher than their peers without SEN. Students with mental illness or emotional problems were most vulnerable to academic stress of tertiary education, whereas students with physical and sensory impairments were very well adjusted and their psychosocial outcomes were not significantly different from their pees without SEN. Findings of the study were discussed and implications of the findings for IE research considered.

Reference
  • 1. Assari, S. (2019). High sense of mastery reduces psychological distress for African American women but not African American men. Archives of General Internal Medicine, 3(1), 5-9.

    2. Blankenship, T., Fore, C., & Boon, R. T. (2005). Efficacy and Perception of Inclusion at the Secondary Level for Students with Mild Disabilities: A Review of the Literature, Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 1 (9). https://corescholar.libraries. wright.edu/ejie

    3. Booth, T. (1996). Changing views about research on integration: The inclusion of students with special needs or participation for all? In A. Sigston, P. Curran, A. Labram, & S.Wolfendale (Eds.), Psychology in practice with young people, families and schools (pp. 181-194).

    4. D. Fulton.Deb S., Strodl, E., & Sun, J. (2015). Academic stress, parental pressure, anxiety and mental health among Indian high school students. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 5(1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijpbs.20150501.04

    5. Education Bureau (2021). HKDSE statistics (2017 - 2020). Government of Hong Kong SAR

    6. Elbaum, B. B. (2002). The self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of comparisons across different placements. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(4), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00047

    7. Forlin, C. (2012). Future directions: What is needed now for effective inclusive teacher education? In C. Forlin (Ed.), Future directions for inclusive teacher education (pp. 173-182). Routledge.

    8. Haug, P. (2017). Understanding IE: Ideal and reality. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(3), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1224778

    9. Hausiku, R. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of the implementation process of the IE policy in two schools in the Kavango East Region in Namibia (Master Thesis). Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

    10. Heward, W. L. (2009). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (9th ed.). Pearson.

    11. Ho, F., & Lam, C. S. (2020). Special education an integrated education in Hong Kong. Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Education. Oxford University Press.

    12. Hong, B. S. S. (2015). Qualitative analysis of the barriers college students with disabilities experience in tertiary education. Journal of College Student Development, 56(3), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2015.0032

    13. Hong, B. S. S., Ivy, W. F., Gonzalez, H. R., & Ehrensberger, W. J. (2007). Preparing students for postsecondary education: What K–12 teachers and tertiary education faculty can do to empower students with and without disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 32-¬38. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990704000104

    14. Jacklin, A., Robinson, C., O'Meara, L. & Harris, A. (2007). Improving the experiences of disabled students in tertiary education. The Tertiary education Academy

    15. Kelly, M. M., Tyrka, A. R., Price, L. H., & Carpenter, L. L. (2008). Sex differences in the use of coping strategies. Depression and Anxiety, 25(10), 839-846. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20341

    16. Kessler R.C., Andrews G., Colpe L.J., Hiripi E., Mroczek D.K., Normand S.L., Walters E.E., Zaslavsky A.M. (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non‐specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959-976. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006074

    17. Lam, B. H., & Yeung, A. S. W. (2005). Inclusion or exclusion? – A study of Hong Kong Students’ affective and social outcomes in mainstream classroom. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 4(2), 45-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-005-3509-4

    18. Li, S. H., & Graham, B. M. (2017). Why are women so vulnerable to anxiety, trauma-related and stress-related disorders? The potential role of sex hormones. Lancet Psychiatry, 4(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30358-3

    19. Lindsay, G. (2007). Educational psychology and the effectiveness of IE/ mainstreaming. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X156881

    20. Monteiro, R.P., Coelho, G.L.D., Hanel, P.H.P., de Medeiros, E. D., & da Silva, P. D. G. (2021). The efficient assessment of self-esteem: Proposing the Brief Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Applied Research Quality Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09936-4

    21. Moriña, A. (2017). IE in tertiary education: Challenges and opportunity. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964

    22. Ng, H. N., Boey, K. W., Kwan, C, W. (2022). Validation of measuring instruments of integrated education: For assessment of students and teachers in institutes of tertiary education. Research Unit of Love, Marriage and Family, Caritas Institute of Tertiary education, Hong Kong.

    23. Papaleontiou-Louca, E. (2021) Effects of religion and faith on mental health. New Ideas in Psychology, 60, 100833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100833

    24. Rustemier, S. (2002). Social and educational justice: The human rights framework for inclusion. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.

    25. Seale, J., Georgeson, J., Mamas, C., & Swain, J. (2015). Not the Right Kind of ‘Digital Capital’? An examination of the complex relationship between disabled students, their technologies and tertiary education institutions. Computers and Education, 82, 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.007

    26. Sharma, U., & Chow, E. W. S. (2008). The attitudes of Hong Kong primary school principals toward integrated education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(3), 380-391.

    27. Sin, K. F., Forlin, C., Ho, F. C., Au, M. L., Yan, Z., & Lui, Ming (2012). Equal learning opportunities for students with disabilities under the integrated education system. Centre for Special Education needs and IE, The Hong Kong institute of Education, Hong Kong.

    28. Skrzypiec, G., Askell-Williams, H., Slee, P., & RudzinskiI, A. (2016). Students with self-identified special educational needs and disabilities: Flourishing or languishing. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1111301

    29. Taylor S. E., Brown J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193

    30. Taylor S. E., Brown J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.21

    31. Vaingankar, J. A., Choudhary, N., Chong, S. A., Kumar, F., Abdin, E., Shafie, S., Chua, B. Y., van Dam, R. M., & Subramaniam, M. (2021). Religious affiliation in relation to positive mental health and mental disorders in a multi-ethnic Asian population. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(7), 3368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph 18073368

    32. Walping, L. (2016), IE and children with disabilities: Quality education for all in low and middle income countries. Christian Blind Mission

    33. Wong-Ratcliff, M., & Ho, K. K. (2011). Can integrated education meet the needs of students with SEN? New Horizons in Education, 59(2), 101-115.

    34. Zeleke, S. (2004). Self-concepts of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers: A critical review.” European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19 (2), 145-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250410001678469