Secondary students in Selangor's perspectives on constructivist learning environments: Preferences versus reality
List of Authors
  • Hasniza Ibrahim , Wirawani Kamarulzaman

Keyword
  • Constructivist Learning Environments, Mathematics Education, Preferred And Actual Experiences, Pedagogical Methodologies, Secondary School Students

Abstract
  • In the dynamic educational setting of Malaysia, the shift towards constructivist learning environments represents a crucial change in teaching methodologies. This research delves into the intricacies of constructivist learning environments, particularly within the realm of mathematics education for secondary school students in Selangor. The study aims to unravel distinctions between students preferred and actual experiences within these contructivist educational settings. The specific objectives include: 1) examining the gap between students' perceptions of their preferred and actual constructivist learning environment (CLE), 2) identifying gender differences in preferences for CLE, and 3) determining gender variations in perceptions of actual CLE. Quantitative analysis of students' perspectives reveals a significant misalignment between their preferences and actual encounters within constructivist learning environments. Despite students' inclination towards such environments, the practical implementation falls short of their expectations. Exploring gender differences, the study finds that, while there is no notable gender distinction in preferred constructivist learning environments, male students perceive a higher frequency of constructivist learning in actual experiences compared to their female counterparts. These identified disparities between preferred and actual constructivist learning environments highlight a critical gap in the Malaysian educational landscape. The study advocates for an enhanced implementation of constructivist methodologies, aligning with scholarly calls to address observed discrepancies. The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and educators to consider in the creation of inclusive and effective learning environments. This research significantly contributes to the ongoing discourse on constructivist learning environments in Malaysia, providing guidance for impactful modifications in educational methodologies.

Reference
  • 1. Almasri, F. (2022). The impact of e-learning, gender-groupings and learning pedagogies in biology undergraduate female and male students’ attitudes and achievement. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8329–8380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10967-z

    2. Darko Amponsah, K. (2014). Gender differences in learning environment and student attitudes in high School chemistry classrooms in South Africa. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(8), 1–13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262689281

    3. Diaz, L. D. E. (2017). The teaching and learning process of mathematics in the primary education stage: A constructivist proposal within the framework of key competences. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 709–713.

    4. Hussain, S., Ahmed, S., Mubeen, S., & Tariq, S. (2011). The effectiveness of teaching physics through project method on academic achievement of students at secondary level -A case study. Journal of Education and Practice, 2(8), 28–34. www.iiste.org

    5. Ibrahim, H (2021). The Relationships between Constructivist Learning Environment, Mathematics Attitude, and Algebra Performance from The Perspective of Form One Students in Selangor, Malaysia. International Islamic University Malaysia [Unpublished doctoral dissertation

    6. Ilyas, B. M., Jamil, K., Prof, R., Bhatti, M. T., Malik, N., & Prof, A. (2013). Effect of teaching of algebra through social constructivist approach on 7th graders’ learning outcomes in Sindh (Pakistan). In International Journal (Vol. 6, Issue 1). www.e-iji.net

    7. Indrapangastuti, D., Surjono, H. D., Sugiman, & Yanto, B. E. (2021). Effectiveness of the blended learning model to improve students schievement of mathematical concepts. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(4), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.84.423.430

    8. Kazem Banihashem, S., Noroozi, O., & Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M. (2021). Gender differences in engagement and self-regulation in an online constructivist learning design and learning analytics environment. International Conference on Studies in Education and Social Sciences, 171–176. www.istes.orghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9978-3783https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0622-289X

    9. Khalid, M. (2017). Fostering problem solving and performance assessment among Malaysian mathematics teachers. Sains Humanika, 9(1–2), 51–55. www.sainshumanika.utm.my

    10. Kharuddin, A. F., & Ismail, N. A. (2017). Graphing calculator exposure of mathematics learning in a partially technology incorporated environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2529–2537. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01238a

    11. Lessani, A., Yunus, A. S. M., Tarmiz, R. A., & Mahmud, R. (2014). Investigating Malaysian secondary school mathematics teachers’ perception of National Philosophy of Education. International Education Studies, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n10p122

    12. Ministry of Education. (2013). MALAYSIA EDUCATION BLUEPRINT 2013-2025. www.moe.gov.my

    13. Razali, A., & Zaid, M. (2022). Keberkesanan pembelajaran kendiri bagi kemahiran membina ayat dalam bahasa melayu menggunakan video pendekatan konstruktivisma terhadap murid pemulihan khas. Sains Humanika, 14(3–2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v14n3-2.2018

    14. Sa’adah Jamaluddin, N. (2023). Applicability of constructivist-oriented teaching in the process of educational transformation in Malaysia. International Business Education Journal, 16(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej/Vol.16.1.3.2023

    15. Saleh, S. (2012). Teaching practices among secondary school teachers in Malaysia. 2nd International Conference on Education, Research and Innovation–ICERI. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281277133_Teaching_Practices_Among_Secondary_School_Teachers_in_Malaysia

    16. Seifert, H. E. (2016). Gender differences, learning styles, and participation in higher mathematics [Walden University]. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations

    17. Taber, K. S. (2018). Constructivism in education. In Early Childhood Development (pp. 312–342). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7507-8.ch015

    18. Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2

    19. Yulia Prawestri, P., Gusti Putu Sudiarta, I., & Wayan Puja Astawa, I. (2020). The effect of online discussion in blended learning on students’ mathematical moncept comprehension and attitude. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1503(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012017

    20. Zulfiqar Mat Lui, M., Awang, M., Razzaq Ahmad, A., & Muhthar, A. (2019). Constructivism approach to increase the knowledge and appreciation in history among secondary student. Global Conferences Series: Social Sciences, Education and Humanities (GCSSSEH, 2, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.32698/gcs.0177