The relationship between the characteristics of a risk management committee and the issuance of a modified audit opinion in the Jordanian context
List of Authors
  • Saleh Zaid Alkilani , Wan Nordin Wan Hussin

Keyword
  • corporate governance; risk committee; modified audit opinion; Jordan

Abstract
  • Because of the failures that have occurred in the wake of the financial crises worldwide, many studies and researchers have recommended establishing separate risk committees at the level of the board of directors to manage the risks and supervise the risks faced by companies, as well as work to prevent excessive risks. This study investigated whether any differences exist in the companies that have risk committees from those in which do not have risk committees. The main research question of this study was whether the risk committees impact the quality of financial reports in Jordanian industrial and service companies, and another examined the relationship between characteristics including size, qualifications, meeting frequency, and independence and the issuance of a modified opinion. In this study, the quality of financial reports was measured through the issuance of a modified opinion by an external auditor. The sample of the study consisted of all companies (industrial and service) that were listed on the Amman Stock Exchange between 2015 and 2018. The results found a negative relationship between characteristics of the risk committees, including the existence of a committee, qualifications of members, and frequency of meetings and the issuance of a modified audit opinion. The results indicated that the independence of the risk committees had a significant and positive impact on the issuance of a modified opinion, which indicates that it did not reduce the likelihood that a Jordanian company would receive a modified audit opinion. This study did not find any significant effect of the size of a risk committee on the issuance of a modified opinion. The results of this empirical study provided substantial evidence of the importance of the existence of risk committees in companies and their characteristics to raise the quality and efficiency of financial reports. Because risk committees in industrial and service companies can reduce the likelihood that a company would receive a modified audit opinion for risk-related reasons, policymakers and regulators should note the importance of the existence and characteristics of separate risk committees industrial and service companies.

Reference
  • 1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 17-32. doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69

    2. Abdullah, M., & Shukor, Z. A. (2017). The comparative moderating effect of risk management committee and audit committee on the association between voluntary risk management disclosure and firm performance. Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM Journal of Management), 51, 159-172. doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2018-51-14

    3. Abdullah, M., Shukor, Z. A., & Rahmat, M. M. (2017). The influences of risk management committee and audit committee towards voluntary risk management disclosure. Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM Journal of Management), 50, 85-93. doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2017-50-08

    4. Abdullatif, M., Ghanayem, H., Ahmad-Amin, R., Al-shelleh, S., & Sharaiha, L. (2015). The performance of audit committees in Jordanian public listed companies. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(1), 762-773.

    5. Abdulmalik, S. (2015). Financial reporting quality: The role of independent and grey directors, board continuous training and internal audit function. International Postgraduate Business Journal, 7(2), 40-57.

    6. Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213-3226. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.020

    7. Ahmad, R. A. R., Abdullah, N., Jamel, N. E. S. M., & Omar, N. (2015). Board characteristics and risk management and internal control disclosure level: Evidence from Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 601-610. doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01147-8

    8. Al‐Hadi, A., Hasan, M. M., & Habib, A. (2016). Risk committee, firm life cycle, and market risk disclosures. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(2), 145-170. doi.org/10.1111/corg.12115

    9. Ali, M. M., Besar, S. S. N. T., & Mastuki, N. A. M. (2017). Audit committee characteristics, risk management committee and financial restatements. Advanced Science Letters, 23(1), 287-291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7160

    10. Alkilani, S. Z., Hussin, W. N. W., & Salim, B. (2019). Impact of ownership characteristics on modified audit opinion in Jordan. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management, 4(3), 71-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190403.11

    11. Alkilani, S. Z., Hussin, W. N. W., & Salim, B. (2019). The influence of audit committee characteristics on modified audit opinion in Jordan. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(3), 95-106. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20190703.14

    12. Al-Othman, L. N., & Al-Zoubi, M. N. (2019). The impact of the board of directors characteristics on earnings quality of listed industrial companies on the Amman Stock Exchange. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(1), 1-16.

    13. Alzoubi, E. S. S., & Selamat, M. H. (2012). The effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms on constraining earning management: Literature review and proposed framework. International Journal of Global Business, 5(1), 17-35.

    14. Armaya’u, A. S, Rohaida, A. L. & Redhwan, A. (2018). Risk management committee and real earnings management through sales: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies, 12(1), 62-69.

    15. Badriyah, N., Sari, R. N., & Basri, Y. M. (2015). The effect of corporate governance and firm characteristics on firm performance and risk management as an intervening variable. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 868-875. doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01184-3

    16. Ballesta, J. P. S., & García‐Meca, E. (2005). Audit qualifications and corporate governance in Spanish listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(7), 725-738. doi.org/10.1108/02686900510611258

    17. Bates, E. W., & Leclerc, R. J. (2009). Board of directors and risk committees. The Corporate Governance Advisor, 17(6), 16-18.

    18. Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257-273. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006

    19. Brown, I., Steen, A., & Foreman, J. (2009). Risk management in corporate governance: A review and proposal. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 546-558. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00763.x

    20. Cabedo, J. D., & Tirado, J. M. (2004). The disclosure of risk in financial statements. Accounting Forum, 28(2), 181-200. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2003.10.002

    21. Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453-467. doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.4.453

    22. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53. doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034

    23. Choi, I. (2013). When do companies need a board-level risk management committee? Retrieved from https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/f7c51769-9a79-4546-b40c-9965cde12beb/ PSO+ 31.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=jS3hRL

    24. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods (8th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, Irwin.

    25. Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Rusticus, T. O. (2006). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors' expectations. The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 655-687. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00851.x

    26. De Andrés Suárez, J., García, E. C., Méndez, C. F., & Gutiérrez, C. R. (2013). The effectiveness of the audit committee in Spain: Implications of its existence on the auditor’s opinion. SERIEs, 4(3), 333-352. doi: 10.1007/s13209-012-0094-7

    27. Deloitte. (2011). The risk committee resource guide for boards. Retrieved from dttl-grc-riskcommitteeresourceguideforboards

    28. Deloitte. (2014). Global risk management survey (8th ed.) Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/lu/ en/pages/risk/articles/global-risk management-survey-8.html

    29. DeZoort, F. T., & Salterio, S. E. (2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial-reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members' judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 31-47. doi.org/ 10.2308/aud.2001.20.2.31

    30. Dionne, G., & Triki, T. (2005). Risk management and corporate governance: The importance of independence and financial knowledge for the board and the audit committee. HEC Montreal Working Paper No. 05-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=730743 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.730743

    31. Dionne, G., Chun, O. M., & Triki, T. (2019). The governance of risk management: The importance of directors’ independence and financial knowledge. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 22(3), 247-277. doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12129

    32. Dionne, G., Chun, O.M. & Thouraya, T. 2015. Risk management and corporate governance: the importance of independence and financial knowledge. Available at http://ssrn. com/abstract=2082515 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.2082515.

    33. Elamer, A. A., & Benyazid, I. (2018). The impact of risk committee on financial performance of UK financial institutions. International Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8(2), 161-180. doi: 10.1504/IJAF.2018.093290

    34. Elamer, A. A., Ntim, C. G., & Abdou, H. A. (2017). Islamic governance, national governance, and bank risk management and disclosure in MENA countries. Business & Society. doi.org/10.1177/0007650317746108

    35. Erkens, D. H., Hung, M., & Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389-411. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.01.005

    36. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.

    37. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. https://www.jstor.org/stable/725104?seq=1

    38. Farinha, J., & Viana, L. F. (2009). Board structure and modified audit opinions: Evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange. International Journal of Auditing, 13(3), 237-258. doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00394.x

    39. Firth, M., Fung, P. M., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Ownership, two-tier board structure, and the informativeness of earnings–Evidence from China. Journal of accounting and public policy, 26(4), 463-496. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.05.004

    40. Fraser, I., & Henry, W. (2007). Embedding risk management: Structures and approaches. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(4), 392-409. doi.org/10.1108/ 02686900710741955

    41. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    42. Ishak, S., & Yusof, M. A. M. (2015). Board of directors’ independence and modified audit report: An analysis of the Malaysian environment. Jurnal Pengurusan, 44, 47-55.

    43. Jenson, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

    44. Judge, G. G., Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E., Lütkepohl, H., & Lee, T. C. (1988). Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    45. Kallamu, B. S., Saat, N. M., & Senik, R. (2013). Corporate strategy and firm performance in finance industry: The moderating role risk management committee. International Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(11), 143-153.

    46. Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 649-675. doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.649

    47. Larasati, D. A., Ratri, M. C., Nasih, M., & Harymawan, I. (2019). Independent audit committee, risk management committee, and audit fees. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1). doi: 10.1080/23311975.2019.1707042

    48. Lawlor, B. (2012, December). Board risk committees. Corporate Governance, 44(6), 40-42.

    49. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59-77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40687360

    50. Masyitoh, O. C., & Seak, D. A. (2010). The analysis of determinants of going concern audit report. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 6(4), 26-37.

    51. Moore, M. A., & Brauneis, M. J. (2008). US subprime crisis: Risk management's next steps: Low interest rates, an optimistic view of home prices and creative financial structuring created subprime mortgage euphoria. Bank Accounting & Finance, 21(3), 21-29.

    52. Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74-95. doi/10.1177/0974686217701467

    53. Protiviti. (2010). Board perspectives: Risk oversight. New York, NY: Robert Half International Inc.

    54. Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., & De Fuentes, C. (2007). The impact of audit committee characteristics on the enhancement of the quality of financial reporting: An empirical study in the Spanish context. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1394-1412. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00653.x

    55. Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., & García‐Meca, E. (2014). Institutional investors on boards and audit committees and their effects on financial reporting quality. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(4), 347-363. doi.org/10.1111/corg.12070

    56. Rusmin, R., Tower, G., Brown, A., & Van der Zahn, J. L. (2009). Audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour. Financial Reporting Regulation and Governance, 8(1), 1-26. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12617

    57. Salleh, Z., Stewart, J., & Manson, S. (2006). In the impact of board composition and ethnicity on audit quality: Evidence from Malaysian companies. Management and Accounting Review (MAR), 5(2), 61-83. doi.org/10.24191/mar.v5i2.311

    58. Smith, R. (2003). The combined code on corporate governance. London: Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved from https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/ edce667b-16ea-41f4-a6c7-9c30db75bb0c/ Combined-Code-2003.pdf

    59. Subramaniam, N., McManus, L., & Zhang, J. (2009). Corporate governance, firm characteristics and risk management committee formation in Australian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(4), 316-339. doi.org/10.1108/02686900910948170

    60. Suhaimi, I. (2015). The relationship between risk management committee characteristics and modified audit opinion in Malaysia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Available from etd.uum.edu.my/4938/

    61. Tao, N. B., & Hutchinson, M. (2013). Corporate governance and risk management: The role of risk management and compensation committees. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 9(1), 83-99. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2013.03.003

    62. Wenyao, L., & Qin, L. (2007, January). Board of director composition and audit opinions. Presented at the International Conference on Wireless Communication, Networking and Mobile Computing, 21-25 Sept. 2007, Shanghai. doi: 10.1109/WICOM.2007.1585

    63. Yatim, P. (2009). Audit committee characteristics and risk management of Malaysian listed firms. Management and Accounting Review (MAR), 8(1), 19-36. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24191/mar.v8i1.261

    64. Yatim, P. (2010). Board structures and the establishment of a risk management committee by Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 14(1), 17-36. doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9089-6

    65. Yu, L., Wang, D., & Wang, Q. (2018). The effect of independent director reputation incentives on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(9), 3302. doi.org/10.3390/su10093302

    66. Zemzem, A., & Kacem, O. (2014). Risk management, board characteristics and performance in the Tunisian lending institutions. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486), 3(1), 186-200.