Does intercultural communication competence really matter among Malaysian undergraduates?
List of Authors
  • Pragash , Sultana

Keyword
  • intercultural communication competence, anxiety, uncertainty, ethnocentrism

Abstract
  • Positive social interaction is a crucial facet in maintaining a harmonious state among multicultural society in Malaysia. There is no doubt that Malaysians play an important role in reducing conflict among ethnics, fostering unity among their own ethnicity and others as well. Understanding and accepting the differences are the vitals intercultural integration process. Huge responsibility is being placed on universities to ensure the cultivation of intercultural unity among multiracial students. Thus, it has become an important task for the universities to educate students to be interculturally competent. Individuals with intercultural communication competence possess high consciousness about themselves and high desire to learn as much as possible about individuals who speak different language and have different values and habits. Hence, the importance of intercultural communication competence among undergraduates cannot, and should not be undermined. Incorporated by Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory, the present study intends to investigate the impact of three factors, anxiety, uncertainty, and ethnocentrism which could possibly hamper the attainment of intercultural communication competence. Data collected from 457 respondents were analysed using SPSS software using online survey design. The study revealed a moderate negative correlation between all three independent variables and the dependent variables. Anxiety, uncertainty, and ethnocentrism negatively affect intercultural communication competence among Malaysian undergraduates. Higher the anxiety, uncertainty, and ethnocentrism, lower the level of intercultural communication competence.

Reference
  • 1. Allen, M. (Ed.). (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n74 2. Anglickaitė, A. (2017). Netikrumas šiuolaikinėje kultūroje. Fotografijos fenomenas [Doctoral dissertation, Vilnius Academy of Arts]. https://vb.vda.lt/object/elaba:24110017/ 3. Arasaratnam-Smith, L. A. (2020). Developing global graduates: Essentials and possibilities. Research in Comparative and International Education, 15(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499920901945 4. Campbell, N. (2016). Ethnocentrism and intercultural willingness to communicate: A study of New Zealand management students. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 40, 1404-1634. https://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr40/campbell.html 5. Clatterbuck, G. W. (1979). Attributional confidence and uncertainty in initial interaction. Human Communication Research, 5(2), 147-157. a. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00630.x 6. Dalib, S., Harun, M., Yusof, N., & Ahmad, M. K. (2019). Exploring intercultural competence among students in Malaysian campuses. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(1). http://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/27989 7. Diana, A., & Lukman, E. (2018). Pengelolaan kecemasan dan ketidakpastian dalam komunikasi antarbudaya antara auditor dan auditee. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 7(1), 99-108. https://doi/org/10.7454/jki.v7i1.9666 8. Gaston, M. E. (2017). Seeking common ground: First-year US university students’ experiences with intercultural interaction and friendship in an on-campus residential community [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7kz7n1pb 9. Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of effective communication: Making the mesh of the net finer. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 281–322). SAGE Publications. 10. Hartini, H., Fakhrorazi, A., & Islam, R. (2019). The effects of cultural intelligence on task performance and contextual performance: An empirical study on public sector employees in Malaysia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(1), 215-227. 11. Imamura, M., Ruble, R., & Zhang, Y. B. (2016). English proficiency, identity, anxiety, and intergroup attitudes: US Americans’ perceptions of Chinese. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45, 526-539. 12. Jyoti, J., & Kour, S. (2017). Factors affecting cultural intelligence and its impact on job performance. Personnel Review, 46(4), 767-791. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2015-0313 13. Kegeyan, S. E. (2016). Intercultural communication in the workplace and the role of communication in an organization. International Journal of Professional Science, (2). http://scipro.ru/article/03-02-16 14. Keith, K. D. (2019). Ethnocentrism: Seeing the world from where we stand. Cross-Cultural Psychology: Contemporary Themes and Perspectives, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119519348.ch2 15. Koester, J., & Lustig, M. W. (2015). Intercultural communication competence: Theory, measurement, and application. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 48, 20–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.006 16. Marletta, G., Sarli, L., Caricati, L., & Mancini, T. (2017). Intergroup contact and team functioning among nursing students: The mediation role of intergroup anxiety. Acta bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis, 88(Suppl 3), 37. http://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v88i3-S.6612 17. Mingli, W. A. N. G. (2015). Culture shock - One of common problems in intercultural communication. Cross-Cultural Communication, 11(8), 72-75. http://doi.org/10.3968/7399 18. Nadeem, M. U., & Koschmann, M. A. (2021). Does mindfulness moderate the relationship between anxiety, uncertainty, and intercultural communication effectiveness of the students in Pakistan?. Current Psychology, 1-13.http://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01429-9 19. Nair-Venugopal, S. (2015). Issues of language and competence in intercultural business contexts. Language and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), 29-45. http://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.985304 20. Neuliep, J. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997a). The development of a US and generalized ethnocentrism scale. Communication Research Reports, 14(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388682 21. Neuliep, J. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997b). The development of intercultural and interethnic communication apprehension scales. Communication Research Reports, 14(2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388656 22. Neuliep, J. W. (2017). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory. The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0007 23. Neuliep, J. W. (2020). Intercultural communication: A contextual approach (8th ed.). Sage Publications. 24. Portalla, T., & Chen, G. M. (2010). The development and validation of the intercultural effectiveness scale. Intercultural Communication Studies, 19, 21–37. https://web.uri.edu/iaics/files/02TamraPortallaGuo-MingChen.pdf 25. Prince, A. G. (2021). Managing anxiety and uncertainty: applying anxiety/uncertainty management theory to university health professionals and students’ communication. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 1-10.https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2021.1913946 26. Quero, L. N. (2015). Comparative analysis of intercultural communication apprehension displayed by international students in the US interacting with American students and other internationals [Doctoral dissertation, Rochester Institute of Technology]. RIT Scholar Works. https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses/8569/ 27. Ruiz, M. R., & Spínola, N. O. V. (2019). Improving the Intercultural Communicative Competence of English Language Students. Journal of Intercultural Communication, (49), 1-1. https://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr49/ruiz.html 28. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 29. Seyitoglu, F., Guven, A., & Kocabulut, O. (2015, June 30–July 2). Effects of intercultural communication apprehension on satisfaction of foreign students [Paper presentation]. First European Academic Research Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences (EARL 5Italy Conference). Milan, Italy. http://globalbizresearch.org/Italy_Conference/pdf/I549.pdf 30. Tennekoon, S. R. (2015). Crossing the cultural boundaries: Developing intercultural competence of prospective teachers of English. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(4), 1-15. http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0415.php?rp=P403956 31. Tomyuk, O., Dyachkova, M., Shutaleva, A., Novgorodtseva, A., & Dudchik, A. (2019, April 23–28). Bilingual practices as a means of intercultural communication under the globalization [Paper presentation]. The International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences”, Volgograd, Russia. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196900106 32. Tran, T. Q., & Duong, T. M. (2018). The effectiveness of the intercultural language communicative teaching model for EFL learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0048-0 33. Vaccarino, F., & Li, M. (2018). Intercultural communication training to support internationalisation in higher education. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 4(46), 4.