Effectiveness of a sign language mobile application in enhancing English writing for hearing-impaired students
List of Authors
  • Mageswary N Muniandy , Rozniza Zaharudin

Keyword
  • Sign Language Mobile Application, English Writing Skills, Hearing-Impaired Students

Abstract
  • This research investigates the effectiveness of a Sign Language Mobile Application (SLMA) designed to help hearing-impaired students write basic English sentences using Prepositions of Position. The application covers essential grammar, capitalisation, punctuation, spelling, and letter formation elements. The first objective was to design and develop the application using the Rapid Prototyping Model, Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, and Constructivism Theory. The second objective was to assess the application's impact on academic achievement through a pretest, intervention, and posttest. The third objective explored the application's potential to foster self-directed learning through face-to-face interviews with 10 hearing-impaired students, focusing on usability, effectiveness, and satisfaction. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with purposive sampling involving 70 hearing-impaired students from Perak and Penang. The findings demonstrate the application's effectiveness in improving English writing skills, vocabulary, and sign language learning. The intervention group showed a significant increase in mean pretest scores, from 24.46 to 87.29 post-intervention. An independent t-test revealed a significant difference in post-test scores between the control and experimental groups (t(68)= 50.577, p < 0.001), while paired t-tests showed a significant improvement in post-test scores for the experimental group (t(34) = -62.334, p < 0.001) but not for the control group (t(34)= -0.267, p = 0.791). Both tests support the effectiveness of the intervention. Additionally, thematic analysis of interviews with 10 students highlighted a strong preference for the application, especially in enhancing English writing skills. These findings suggest that mobile applications integrating sign language and self-directed learning features can promote independent learning and boost academic achievement in English writing for hearing-impaired students. Future research should consider developing mobile applications that specifically target writing tasks in Paper 2 of the KSSM SPM English examination, allowing hearing-impaired students to prepare alongside their mainstream peers and ensuring equal access to quality education and academic opportunities.

Reference
  • 1. Abiatal, L. K., & Howard, G. R. (2020). Constructivism-led assistive technology: An experiment at a Namibian special primary school. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v10i1.794

    2. Alias, A., Harun, A., & Kamaruddin, N. (2023). Principles and elements of interactive multimedia teaching aids design for hearing-impaired students. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 19(3), 149-170. http://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2023-1903-1

    3. Almusawi, H. (2023). Factors Affecting the Writing Performance in Hearing and Deaf Children: An Insight into Regularities and Irregularities of the Arabic Orthographic System. Language and Speech, 66(1), 246-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309221097714

    4. Bell, D., & Foiret, J. (2020). A rapid review of the effect of assistive technology on the educational performance of students with impaired hearing. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(7), 838-843. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1775317

    5. Choi, J. E., Hong, S. H., & Moon, I. J. (2020). Academic performance, communication, and psychosocial development of prelingual deaf children with cochlear implants in mainstream schools. Journal of audiology & otology, 24(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2019.00346

    6. Chong, V. Y., & Hussain, R. B. M. (2022). Deaf identity construction in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 50(2), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajss.2022.02.001

    7. David, D., Alamoodi, A. H., Albahri, O. S., Garfan, S., Albahri, A. S., Zaidan, B. B., & Chen, J. (2024). Correction: Sign language mobile apps: a systematic review of current app evaluation progress and solution framework. Evolving Systems, 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12530-024-09600-w

    8. David, D., Alamoodi, A. H., Albahri, O. S., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., Garfan, S., ... & Malik, R. Q. (2024). Landscape of sign language research based on smartphone apps: coherent literature analysis, motivations, open challenges, recommendations and future directions for app assessment. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23(2), 687-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00966-9

    9. Fernandes, N., Leite Junior, A. J. M., Marçal, E., & Viana, W. (2023). Augmented reality in education for people who are deaf or hard of hearing: a systematic literature review. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00994-z

    10. Herrera-Marmolejo, A., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Gamboa García, E. K., & Mejía Z, C. (2020). Writing errors in deaf children. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 32(3), 409-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09701-4

    11. Herrera, S. I., Manresa-Yee, C., & Sanz, C. V. (2023). Mobile learning for hearing-impaired children: Review and analysis. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(2), 635-653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00841-z

    12. Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313401

    13. Kelly, J. F., McKinney, E. L., & Swift, O. (2022). Strengthening teacher education to support deaf learners. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(13), 1289-1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1806366

    14. Khairuddin, K. F., & Miles, S. (2020). School staff members' and parents' experiences of the inclusion of deaf children in Malaysian mainstream schools. Education 3-13, 48(3), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1664403

    15. Krejcie, R. V. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational Psychol Meas. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

    16. Krishnan, I., Mello, G., Kok, S., Sabapathy, S., Munian, S., Ching, H., Kandasamy, P., Ramalingam, S., Baskaran, S., & Kanan, V. (2020). Challenges Faced by Hearing Impairment Students During COVID-19. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(8), 106 - 116. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i8.472

    17. Manar, M., Sudana, D., & Lukmana, I. (2023). Prepositional Phrases in Deaf and Hearing Students' Narratives: A Functional Perspective. International Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2023.38

    18. Mat Nasir, N. A., Hashim, H., Mohd Rashid, S. M., & Md Yunus, M. (2021). Exploring the Potential Usage of Mobile Technologies Among the Hearing-Impaired Students in Learning English as a Second Language (ESL). International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 15(19), pp. 48–63. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i19.22137

    19. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6

    20. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007

    21. Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

    22. Nugraha, D. N. S., & Hermina, N. (2023, September). Mobile Application for Supporting English Language Learning for the Deaf Students. In 4th International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICON-ELT 2023) (pp. 119-130). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-120-3_12

    23. Parvez, K., Khan, M., Iqbal, J., Tahir, M., Alghamdi, A., Alqarni, M., ... & Javaid, N. (2019). Measuring effectiveness of mobile application in learning basic mathematical concepts using sign language. Sustainability, 11(11), 3064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113064

    24. Polvanov, J. N. (2023). Effective Methods of Teaching of Teaching Hearing Impaired Children. American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 3(05), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume03Issue05-22

    25. Shak, M. S. Y., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Tahir, M. H. M., & Adam, M. H. M. (2021). The use of imported CEFR-aligned English language textbooks in Malaysian schools: Issues and concerns. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9), 954-963. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i9/10875

    26. Siong, T. J., Nasir, N. R. M., & Salleh, F. H. M. (2021, March). A mobile learning application for Malaysian sign language education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1860, No. 1, p. 012004). IOP Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1860/1/012004

    27. Supermaniam, M., & Zaharudin, R. (2021). Game-Based Mobile Application (P-KSSMPKPS) Remedial Instruction In Fraction Learning: Best Practices To Teaching And Learning Performance On Students With Learning Disabilities. International Journal of Modern Education, 3(10), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.310008

    28. Vizzi, F., Angelelli, P., Iaia, M., Risser, A. H., & Marinelli, C. V. (2023). Writing composition ability and spelling competence in deaf subjects: a psycholinguistic analysis of source of difficulties. Reading and Writing, 36(5), 1201-1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10335-w

    29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    30. Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45-55.

    31. Wolbers, K., Dostal, H., Graham, S., Branum-Martin, L., & Holcomb, L. (2022). Specialised writing instruction for deaf students: A randomised controlled trial. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211050849

    32. Wolbers, K., Dostal, H., & Holcomb, L. (2023). Teacher reports of secondary writing instruction with deaf students. Journal of Literacy Research, 55(1), 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X231163124

    33. Zhao, Y., Wu, X., Sun, P., & Chen, H. (2021). Relationship between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension in deaf and hard of hearing students. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 26(4), 546-555. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enab023