Assessing the role of mobile applications in improving stoichiometry understanding among matriculation college students: An investigation
List of Authors
  • Mimi Malini Mohmad Fuzi , Wan Ahmad Jaafar Wan Yahaya

Keyword
  • Computational Thinking, Mobile Learning Application, Problem-Solving, Chemistry

Abstract
  • Mobile learning is anticipated to enrich learning experiences, enabling students to access educational content regardless of time or place. In light of the widespread use of smartphones for daily activities and ubiquitous mobile access to the internet, the mobile learning approach becomes feasible. The digital era has initiated significant transformations across various facets of contemporary life, with education being no exception. However, a persistent challenge lies in identifying suitable digital learning platforms and tools to effectively engage students in learning at their own pace, particularly in disciplines such as chemistry at Matriculation College. Chemistry, being a highly complex subject, demands abstract thinking and diverse problem-solving approaches. Computational Thinking (CT) emerges as a potential problem-solving technique in 21st-century learning that is applicable in teaching and learning chemistry. These skills are considered essential for enhancing the digital technology innovation capacity and should be nurtured among students. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the current teaching and learning methods in chemistry and determine the necessity for a mobile learning application that introduces CT as a problem-solving technique among matriculation college students studying chemistry. Findings reveal that lecturers mainly use conventional teaching methods, incorporating blended learning through platforms such as YouTube for video lectures and the distribution of notes through messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram platforms. Notably, there is no standardized technique employed by lecturers in teaching chemistry problem-solving. However, all of them acknowledge the potential of mobile learning applications that integrate CT to effectively engage students in developing problem-solving skills, particularly in the context of solving stoichiometric problems.

Reference
  • 1. Abdul Bujang, S. D., Selamat, A., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P., & Nguyen, N. T. (2020). Digital learning demand for future education 4.0-case studies at Malaysia education institutions. Informatics, 7(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7020013

    2. Aslan, U., Lagrassa, N., Horn, M., & Wilensky, U. (2020). Putting the Taxonomy into Practice: Investigating Students’ Learning of Chemistry with Integrated Computational Thinking Activities. 2020 Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, 2020.

    3. Chongo, S., Osman, K., & Nayan, N. A. (2021). Impact of the Plugged-in and Unplugged Chemistry Computational Thinking Modules on Achievement in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10789

    4. Connolly, C., Hijón-Neira, R., & Grádaigh, S. (2021). Mobile learning to support computational thinking in initial teacher education: A case study. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 13(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2021010104

    5. Gautam, A., Bortz, W., & Tatar, D. (2020). Abstraction through multiple representations in an integrated computational thinking environment. SIGCSE 2020 - Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366892

    6. Hartman, J. R., Nelson, E. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2022). Improving student success in chemistry through cognitive science. Foundations of Chemistry, 24(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-022-09427-w

    7. Jurayev, T. N. (2023). The use of mobile learning applications in higher education institutes. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2023.01.010

    8. Lau, E., Yen, Y., & Hashim, H. (2022). A Systematic Review of Mobile Learning Trends in Supporting the Mastery of Spelling. 16(24), 59–80.

    9. Lok, W. F. (2022). Matriculation students ’ usages and its driving factors in mobile learning for Chemistry. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE, 11(2), 869–877. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22468

    10. Lok, W. F., & Hamzah, M. (2021). Student experience of using mobile devices for learning chemistry. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 893–900. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21420

    11. Lucia, M., Estrada, B., & Zatarain, R. (2022). Patrony : A mobile application for pattern recognition learning. 1237–1260.

    12. Marlina Mohamad. (2021). Amalan Terbaik dalam Rekabentuk Aplikasi M-Pembelajaran. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners Amalan, 6(1), 32–38. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp

    13. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, London.

    14. Nurul Fatni, A., Rohaida, M. S., & Norlidah, A. (2021). Teaching and Learning Practices in Chemistry Practical Work of Malaysian Matriculation Programme : a Needs Analysis. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(October), 13–26.

    15. Phetsrikran, T., Harfield, A., Charoensiriwath, S., & Massagram, W. (2021). Arducation bot: Computational thinking courseware with ios mobile application and educational robotics. ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications, 12(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.24507/icicelb.12.01.27

    16. Sangguro, S. A., Ibrahim, N. H., & Surif, J. (2020). Conditional Knowledge In Stoichiometry Problem Solving. PalArch’s Journals, 17(7), 4635–4647.

    17. Shaharim, S. A., Ishak, N. A., Zaharudin, R., & Salleh, W. N. W. M. (2022). The Development of Integrated Mobile Game-Based Learning in Psycho-B’Greatmodule: A Needs Analysis. Global Journal of …, 2(3), 312–328. https://www.myedujournal.com/index.php/edugermane/article/view/155%0Ahttps://www.myedujournal.com/index.php/edugermane/article/download/155/141

    18. Vaicondam, Y., Sikandar, H., Irum, S., Khan, N., & Qureshi, M. I. (2022). Research Landscape of Digital Learning Over the Past 20 Years: A Bibliometric and Visualisation Analysis. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 18(8), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v18i08.31963

    19. Vo, K., Sarkar, M., White, P. J., & Yuriev, E. (2022). Problem solving in chemistry supported by metacognitive scaffolding: teaching associates’ perspectives and practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp00242b

    20. Wing, J. M. (2006). Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3).

    21. Yuriev, E., Naidu, S., Schembri, L. S., & Short, J. L. (2017). Scaffolding the development of problem-solving skills in chemistry: Guiding novice students out of dead ends and false starts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00009j

    22. Zainal, A. Z., & Zainuddin, S. Z. (2020). Technology adoption in Malaysian schools: An analysis of national ICT in education policy initiatives. Digital Education Review, 37, 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1344/DER.2020.37.172-194