Usability evaluation of a VR French learning app for Google cardboard
List of Authors
  • Dendi Permadi , Soon-Nyean Cheong

Keyword
  • Instructional Design, Virtual Reality, French Language Learning, Usability Evaluation, Immersive Learning

Abstract
  • The purpose of this research work is to investigate cost-effective immersive virtual reality (VR) for learning French language by designing, developing and evaluating Mission Maison, an affordable immersive VR application for Google Cardboard. The development was guided by Design Science Research principle and aligned with John Biggs’ constructive alignment theory to transform passive learning into engaging adventures through immersive environments, compelling stories and gamified quizzes that is accessible via smartphone. 29 Malaysian young adults participated in the usability and acceptance evaluation using the System Usability Scale (SUS) in a controlled environment. All the participants were briefed on the application's functionality and went through a tutorial on using Google Cardboard prior to using the VR application. The evaluation revealed a high usability and learnability of Mission Maison, with an average SUS score of 86.38. The evaluation results also indicated that Mission Maison was easy to use, well-integrated, engaging and with minimal learning curves, serving as strong support that cost-effective immersive VR has the potential of springboarding traditional language learning to provide enjoyable and engaging learning experiences. The research work contributes in terms of a new practical budget-friendly immersive VR French language learning application and insights into usability and acceptance by young adults in Malaysia, for broader accessibility and adoption in language education. The findings provide educators, policymakers, and technology developers with a scalable solution to integrate immersive VR instructional design into curricula with aims to enhance language learning experiences.

Reference
  • 1. Absari, D. T., Djunaidy, A., & Susanto, T. D. (2022, August). Design Science Research Methodology Concept and Its Application in the Development of Online Community Communication System for Selotapak Village. In 2022 9th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE) (pp. 236-241). IEEE.

    2. Alqarni, N. (2023). Language learning strategies and learning engagement as predictors of language learning achievement: An investigation of Saudi EFL learners. Saudi Journal of Language Studies.

    3. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114-123.

    4. Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: A Retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8(2), 29-40.

    5. Cheong, S. N., Tan, J. H., Ng, W. Y., Permadi, D., Tan, Y. F., & Tan, W. H. (2023, October). Enhancing User Experience: Immersive Virtual Reality Property Showhouse. In 2023 IEEE 13th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET) (pp. 29-34). IEEE.

    6. Cowie, N., & Alizadeh, M. (2022). The Affordances and Challenges of Virtual Reality for Language Teaching. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 4(3).

    7. Daling, L. M., Tenbrock, M., Isenhardt, I., & Schlittmeier, S. J. (2023). Assemble it like this!–Is AR-or VR-based training an effective alternative to video-based training in manual assembly? Applied Ergonomics, 110, 104021.

    8. Daniel, A. (2023). Enhancing pupil engagement and learning through augmented reality-based interactive phonetics education. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 9(1), 260-271.

    9. Dooly, M., Thrasher, T., & Sadler, R. (2023). “Whoa! Incredible!:” Language Learning Experiences in Virtual Reality. RELC Journal, 00336882231167610.

    10. Fan, X., Liu, K., Wang, X., & Yu, J. (2023). Exploring Mobile Apps in English Learning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 2367-2374.

    11. Garzón, J., Lampropoulos, G., & Burgos, D. (2023). Effects of Mobile Learning in English Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis. Electronics, 12(7), 1595.

    12. Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201-230.

    13. Huang, H. W., Huang, K., Liu, H., & Dusza, D. G. (2023, January). 360-Degree Virtual Reality Videos in EFL Teaching: Student Experiences. In Advanced Intelligent Virtual Reality Technologies: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR 2022) (pp. 131-143). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

    14. Iwata, Y., Iwata, Y., Iida, H., Inamori, M., & Maeda, S. (2023). Using a Smartphone Application as a Tool for English Learning Among Medical Staff and Students in Japan. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 167-182.

    15. Khoshnevisan, B., & Park, S. (2021). Affordances and pedagogical implications of augmented reality (ar)-integrated language learning. In Designing, Deploying, and Evaluating Virtual and Augmented Reality in Education (pp. 242-261). IGI Global.

    16. Kohnke, L. (2023). Mobile Microlearning: Enhancing Listening, Speaking, Writing, and Reading Skills. In Using Technology to Design ESL/EFL Microlearning Activities (pp. 23-41). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

    17. Lee, H., Hsia, C. C., Tsoy, A., Choi, S., Hou, H., & Ni, S. (2023, September). VisionARy: Exploratory research on Contextual Language Learning using AR glasses with ChatGPT. In Proceedings of the 15th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter (pp. 1-6).

    18. Legault, J., Zhao, J., Chi, Y. A., Chen, W., Klippel, A., & Li, P. (2019). Immersive virtual reality as an effective tool for second language vocabulary learning. Languages, 4(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010013

    19. Major, L., Francis, G. A., & Tsapali, M. (2021). The effectiveness of technology‐supported personalised learning in low‐and middle‐income countries: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1935-1964.

    20. Ma, C. W., Cheng, P. S., Chan, Y. S., & Tipoe, G. L. (2023). Virtual reality: a technology to promote active learning of physiology for students across multiple disciplines. Advances in Physiology Education, 47(3), 594-603.

    21. Marrahi-Gomez, V., & Belda-Medina, J. (2023). The Effect of Using AR Technology on Language Learning. International Journal of English Language Studies, 5(1), 53-58.

    22. Min, W., & Yu, Z. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of Augmented Reality in Language Learning. Sustainability, 15(9), 7235.

    23. Pereira, L. F., da Silva, M. M., Roberto, R. A., Teichrieb, V., & Cavalcante, P. S. (2020, November). Virtual playground: an augmented reality application to improve English learning. In 2020 22nd Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR) (pp. 83-91). IEEE.

    24. Shadiev, R., & Liang, Q. (2024). A review of research on AR-supported language learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 78-100.

    25. Shaukat, S. M. (2023). Exploring the Potential of Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) in Education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology.

    26. Sun, Y., Pandita, S., Madden, J., Kim, B., Holmes, N. G., & Won, A. S. (2023, April). Exploring Interaction, Movement and Video Game Experience in an Educational VR Experience. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-6).

    27. Wang, T., & Wen, J. (2023). Experiential teaching is more conducive to student learning than traditional teaching. Journal of Education and Culture Studies, 7(1), 100.