Developing community through language learning: analysing past tense errors in ESL students’ writing performance
List of Authors
  • Alia Nabila Alias , Azizah Endut , Noraien Mansor

Keyword
  • Error analysis, English as a second language, past tense, errors, interlingual, intralingual

Abstract
  • Language learning which involves the making of mistakes like any other human learning process is vital in a community development. The incorrect usage of tenses is one of the major errors committed by English as a second language (ESL) learners when writing. They are perplexed and do not know which tense is appropriate to be used in different contexts of writing, especially in the use of past tenses (simple past tense, past continuous tense, past perfect tense, and past perfect continuous tense). This case study focused on the errors in past tenses by ESL students who were asked to write in a journal twice a week for four consecutive weeks. The journals were then analysed using error analysis procedures: data collection, error identification, error classification, error description, data explanation, and pedagogical application. It was found that the simple past tense category had the most errors. The findings revealed that the instruments and the nature of the joumal Writing are appropriate to be used in future studies. Suggestions are also offered to enhance students writing performance. It is hoped that this study will pave the way to develop the community’s interest in learning English as a second language.

Reference
  • 1. Azar, B. S. (2002). Understanding and using English grammar New York: Pearson Education.
    2. Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall Regents.
    3. Choi Kim Yok. (1996). Some methodological guidelines for constractive analysis and error analysis. Jurnal Bahasa Moden. 10: 85-99.
    2. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ error. IRALS; 161-170.
    3. Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    4. Darus, Saadiyah and Kaladevi Subramaniam. (2009). Error Analysis of the Written English Essays of Secondary School Students in Malaysia: A Case Study. European Journal of Social Science. 8/3.
    5. Dulay, H. C., Burt, M. K. (1972). Errors and Strategies in child second language acquisition.TESOL Quarterly. 8(2): 129-138.
    6. Gass, S. M. and Selinker. L. (l993).Second language acquisition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
    7. George, H. V. (1972). Common errors in language learning. Rowly Mass: Newbury House.
    8. Mohideen, Haja. (1991). An error analysis in written English of Malay students at pre-university level, with special reference to students at the matriculation centre, International Islamic University Malaysia. Ph.D. Thesis. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
    9. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    10. Murcia, M. C. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. USA: Heinle &
    Heinle.
    11. Nair, Padmanabhan. (1990). An analysis of errors in the English compositions of Malay students in Malaysian secondary schools. Masters, thesis. Kuala Lumpur: University Malaya.
    12. Norhayati M. Wahi. (2000). A study of error analysis of the most common grammatical error in constructing sentences by Form 4 Malay students at a selected school in Klang. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
    13. Pilus, Z. (l993).The English Teacher 22. Considerations in developing materials for the teaching of writing at the pre-university level.
    14. Taylor, G. (1986). Error a.nd explanations. Applied Linguistics. 7(2): 144-166.