Pengaruh komuniti pembelajaran profesional terhadap amalan pengajaran dan pemudahcaraan (PdPc) abad ke-21 dalam kalangan guru matematik - Satu pemikiran semula
List of Authors
  • Aziah Ismail, Fadzilah Amzah , Phey S. Ling

Keyword
  • Revolusi Industri ke-4, Pengajaran dan Pemudahcaraan (PdPc) abad ke-21, Komuniti Pembelajaran Profesional (KPP), kelestarian

Abstract
  • Pengajaran dan Pemudahcaraan (PdPc) abad ke-21 merupakan satu transformasi dalam pendidikan matematik yang memerlukan guru matematik menguasai kemahiran-kemahiran dalam abad ke-21 agar mampu menyediakan murid yang dapat berhadapan dengan cabaran Revolusi Industri ke-4 serta menyumbang kepada kemajuan negara. Menyedari kepentingan guru memahami seterusnya melakukan perubahan dalam proses PdPc yang sesuai dengan pendidikan abad ke-21, Komuniti Pembelajaran Profesional (KPP) dianggap sebagai pemangkin yang berpotensi untuk penambahbaikan tersebut. KPP dilihat memberikan pengaruh kepada kemahiran PdPc abad ke-21 dalam kalangan guru matematik. Sesungguhnya, amalan PdPc abad ke-21 mempunyai konstruk-konstruk tersendiri dan KPP juga mempunyai dimensi-dimensi yang khusus. Pemilihan dimensi-dimensi KPP, konstruk-konstruk PdPc abad ke-21, pengaruh setiap dimensi terhadap setiap konstruk atau konstruk-konstruk PdPc abad ke-21 perlu mengikut satu kaedah yang ditentusahkan. Banyak kajian menunjukkan bahawa PdPc abad ke-21 mempunyai lapan konstruk iaitu kemahiran pemikiran kritikal, kemahiran kolaboratif, kemahiran komunikasi, kemahiran kreativiti dan inovasi, hala tuju diri, menjalinkan hubungan global dan setempat serta menggunakan teknologi. Manakala, KPP mempunyai enam dimensi iaitu kepimpinan berkongsi dan menyokong, perkongsian nilai, matlamat, visi dan misi, pembelajaran kolektif dan aplikasi, perkongsian amalan peribadi serta keadaan persekitaran yang membentuk hubungan dan keadaan persekitaran yang membentuk struktur. Justeru, dalam usaha untuk meningkatkan keberkesanan pelaksanaan dan kelestarian amalan PdPc abad ke-21 dan KPP dalam kalangan guru matematik, penilihan konstruk PdPc abad ke-21 dan dimensi-dimensi KPP seharusnya melalui proses yang objektif, jelas dan telus supaya segala hasrat dan perancangan kerajaan dapat dilaksanakan dengan jayanya. Kertas konsep ini akan membincangkan dari segi keperluan dan kerangka konseptual pengaruh KPP terhadap PdPc abad ke-21 guru matematik yang berkesan dan mantap serta mekanisme yang lebih objektif melalui pembinaan instrumen psikometri yang boleh diguna pakai bagi mengkaji pengaruh KPP terhadap PdPc abad ke-21 dalam kalangan guru matematik di sekolah.

Reference
  • 1. Abdul Halim, A. (2017). Kesediaan Guru Matematik Sekolah Menengah Dalam

    2. Melaksanakan Proses Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Abad ke-21. In Abdul Halim, A., & Nurul Farhana, J (Eds.), Isu-isu Pendidikan Kontemporary (pp.567-584). Falkulti Pendidikan, UTM.

    3. Abdul Rahman, A. M. K. (2007). Guru sebagai penyelidik. PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

    4. Abdul Rasid Bin Abdul Razzaq, Mohd Norazmi Bin Nordin, Mohamad Zaid Bin Mustafa, Badaruddin Bin Ibrahim (2021). Questionnaire for Special Education Leadership: A Pilot Study. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 1, 2587-2614

    5. Abdullah, A. G. K., & Ling, Y. L. (2019). Pengaruh moderator bagi komuniti pembelajaran professional terhadap kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dan efikasi kolektif guru. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 6(3), 1-16.

    6. Abdullah, Z., Manaf, Z. A., Ail, N. M. M., & Ramzy, M. I. (2016). Pemerkasaan guru Bahasa Melayu melalui penyeliaan kembang tumbuh dan komuniti pembelajaran profesional (KPP) di lima buah sekolah menengah daerah kuala Lipis, Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 36(2), 42-59.

    7. Abu Bakar, N. (2013). Kurikulum Ke Arah Penghasilan Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis, Kreatif Dan Inovatif. Jurnal Kurikulum &Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(1). 10-18.

    8. Ain, N. A., & Wan Mohamed, W. A. (2017). Kemahiran abad ke-21 wanita dalam mengharungi cabaran globalisasi. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 2(1). https://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/4762

    9. Amatan, M. A., & Han, C. G. K. (2019). Pengaruh persekitaran psikososial sekolah dan efikasi kendiri guru terhadap amalan pengajaran dan pembelajaran abad ke-21. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, Counseling, 4(32), 301-331.

    10. Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st-century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154

    11. Azian, A. A., Fauziah, I., Noor Mala, I., & Norhanim, A. S. (2017). Investigating the implementation of higher order thinking skills in Malaysian classrooms: Insights from L2 teaching practices. Sains Humanika, 9(4–2), 65–73.

    12. Badrul, H. A. O., & Mohd Nasruddin, B. (2016). Amalan pengajaran dan pembelajaran abad ke-21 dalam kalangan institut pendidikan guru kampus Ipoh. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 10, 1–23.

    13. Bael, B. T., Nachiappan, S., & Pungut, M. (2021). Analisis kesediaan guru dalam pelaksanaan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam pembelajaran, pengajaran dan pemudahcaraan abad ke 21. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 100-119.

    14. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (BPK). (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tingkatan 3. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (BPK).

    15. Bahagian Profesionalisme Guru (BPG). (2019). Kit PLC. KPM.

    16. Benade, L. (2015). Teacher’s Critical Reflective Practice in the Context Of 21st Century Learning. Open Review of Educational Research, 2(1). 42-54.

    17. Bhayangkara, A. N., Ahmadi, W. H., Firdaus, D. B., Prestiadi, D., & Sumarsono, R. B. (2020, November). The role of instructional leadership through Kurt Lewin model in improving the teacher capability. In 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020) (pp. 307-317). Atlantis Press.

    18. Bishop, J. (2015). Model partnership for 21st century skills. https://www.imls.gov.

    19. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for stem education: challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association.

    20. Cassity, A. H. (2012). Relationship among perceptions of professional learning communities, school academic optimism, and student achievement in Alabama middle and high schools. The University of Alabama.

    21. Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of stem education: critical

    22. Chong, C. K., Ghani, M. F. A., & Abdullah, Z. (2018). Cabaran amalan koumuniti pembelajaran profesional (KPP) dalam kalangan guru sekolah rendah berprestasi tinggi Malaysia. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum dann Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(3), 1-14.

    23. Christopher A. Wolters (2010). Self-regulated learning and the 21st century competencies. Department of Educational Psychology University of Houston.

    24. Corinne, M. (2022). Developing 21st century teaching skills: A case study of teaching and learning through project- based curriculum. Cogent Education, 9. 1-16.

    25. Cummings, S., Bridgman, T.,& Brown, K. G. (2016). Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. Human Relations 2016, 69(1) 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715577707

    26. Cynthia D. WilsonCindy L. MilesRonald L. BakerR. Laurence Schoenberger (2000). Learning outcomesfor the 21st century: report of a community college study. ERCS Publications.

    27. DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Solution Tree.

    28. DuFour, R., DuFour, R. B., Eaker, R. E., & Karhanek, G. (2004). Whatever it takes: how professional learning communities respond when kids don’t learn. Solution Tree Press.

    29. Gonzales, N. A. P. (2020). 21st century skills in higher education: Teaching and learning at Ifugao State University, Philippines. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 72-81.

    30. Hanapi, M. H. M., Zakaria, N., Mokhtar, N. N., Shaffeei, K., & Jamil, M. R. M. (2022). Kefahaman dan penerimaan pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat komuniksai dalam pengajaran dan pemudahcaraan matematik guru sekolah rendah. Journal of Education, 7(46), 657-667.

    31. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2018). Why context matters: a comparative perspective on education reform and policy implementation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 17(3), 195-207.

    32. Henderson, J. (2008) Developing students' creative skills for 21st century success. Education Update 50 (12), 1-10.

    33. Hidayah, H. N. (2014). Hubungan amalan komuniti pembelajaran profesional dengan pencapaian murid sekolah-sekolah rendah daerah Batang Padang. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

    34. Hipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (2003). Professional learning communities: assessment development effects. The Scarecrow Press.

    35. Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

    36. Ismail, S. N., Muhammad, S., Omar, M. N., Shanmugam, S. K. S., & Rajoo, M. (2022). The practice of critical thinking skills in teaching mathematics: Teachers’ perception and readiness. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.1

    37. Ismail, S. N., Yakob, W. R. W., Mustapai, N., & Mat, T. R. T. (2021). Hubungan antara komuniti pembelajaran profesional (KPP) dengan motivasi guru di sekolah menengah harian daerah Jeli. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 6(42), 14-29.

    38. Jalil, N. A. A., & Siew, N. M. (2022). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen pembelajaran abad ke-21 guru matematik sekolah menengah menggunakan model pengukuran rasch. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(3), 1-15.

    39. Jerry, F. C., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2021). Pelaksanaan pembelajaran berasaskan Inkuiri kritis dalam mata pelajaran Matematik. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(2), 386-400.

    40. Keane, T., Keane, W. F., & Blicblau, A. S. (2016). Beyond traditional literacy: Learning and transformative practices using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 769–781.

    41. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2013). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM).

    42. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2016). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025: 2016 annual report. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM).

    43. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2018). Laporan tahunan 2018. https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/pppm-2013-2025-pendidikan-prasekolah-hingga-lepas-menengah/laporan-tahunan-2018/3283-laporan-tahunan-bm/file

    44. Khalid, F., Joyes, G., Ellison, L., & Daud, M. Y. (2014). Factors influencing teachers' level of participation in online communities. International Education Studies, 7(13), 23-32.

    45. Koffeman, A., & Snoek, M. (2018). Identifying context factors as a source for teacher professional learning. Professional development in education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1557239

    46. Kohl K.T. (2014). Teachers’s perceptions of becoming a professional learning community. Walden University.

    47. Lau, J. S. C., & Rosli, R. B. (2020). Pengetahuan teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi guru matematik sekolah rendah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(11), 71-84.

    48. Lee, A. (2012). The Effects of Computer-based Learning Activities and School Contextual Factors on Student Math Achicvement. Leadership amd Poliy Quarterly, 1, 58-72.

    49. Liew, P. H., Effendi, M., & Matora, E. M. (2020). Persepsi dalam Penggunaan Flipped Classroom dalam Pengajaran dan Pemudahcaraan (PdPc): Sorotan Literatur Bersistematik. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(12), 188-200.

    50. Lim, C. S. (2015). Imej matematik, kualiti guru dan lesson study. Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    51. Liyew, E. D., Chala, A. A., & Berhe, M. G. (2017). An investigation in to the combined and relative influences of some selected factors on students’ performance in Physics among secondary schools of Bale Zone, Southeast Ethiopia. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(19), 52–59.

    52. Lubis, M. A., Hassan, W. N. S. W., & Hamzah, M. I. (2017). Tahap pengetahuan dan kesediaan guru-guru Pendidikan Islam sekolah menengah di Selangor terhadap penggunaan multimedia dalam pengajaran Pendidikan Islam. ASEAN Comparative Education Research Journal, 1-13.

    53. Marilyn M. Lombardi (2007). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview. Didapati di www.educause.edu.ir dilayari pada 10 Oktober 2015Marzuki, M. A. (2013). Amalan kepimpinan Islam pengetua dan perkaitannya terhadap atribut komuniti pembelajaran profesional. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

    54. Marzuki, M. A., Norsiah, A. Z., Azhar, M., & Hassan, W. E. W. (2015). Komuniti pembelajaran profesional: Aplikasi dalam kalangan komuniti SMKA di negeri Johor. International Journal of Islamic Studies and Arabic Language Education, 2(1), 11–22.

    55. Mazlan, R., & Mahamod, Z. (2016). Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhi kesediaan guru Bahasa Melayu melaksanakan kajian pengajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 41(2), 173-182.

    56. Mishra, P., & Mehta. R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6-19.

    57. Mohamad, A. M., Azhar, Z. N., Muhammad, A., & Embong, W. H. W. (2015). Komuniti pembelajaran profesional: Aplikasi dalam kalangan komuniti SMKA di negeri Johor. International Journal of Islamic Studies and Arabic Language Education, 2(1), 11-22

    58. Mohammad Azri, A., & Crispina, G. K. H. (2020). Perbezaan faktor demografi dalam efikasi kendiri guru dan amalan pengajaran dan pembelajaran abad ke 21. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences Journal Homepage, 18(1), 17–36.

    59. Mohd Norazmi Bin Nordin, Mohamad Zaid Bin Mustafa Abdul Rasid Bin Abdul Razzaq (2021). Special Education Need the True Leadership: The Review. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation; 32(3): 1622-1628.

    60. Mohd Rusdin, N., & Ali, S. R. (2019). Amalan dan cabaran pelaksanaan pembelajaran abad ke-21. International Conference on Islamic Civilization and Technology Management, 87–105.

    61. Mokhtar, M. M., & Sahat, M. N. (2022). Tinjauan berkaitan amalan kreativiti guru pendidikan islam dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran abad ke-21 [overview on the creativity practice of islamic education teachers in teaching and 21st century learning]. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences (e-ISSN: 2600-9080), 5(2), 1-10.

    62. Mulligan, D. G. (2016). Teacher and school administrator perceptions of their learning community. Walden University.

    63. Murugaiah, P., Azman, H., Thang, S. M., & Krish, P. (2012). Teacher learning via communities of practice: A Malaysian case study. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 7(2), 162-174.

    64. Musa, M., & Samsudin, W. N. A. M. (2021). Implementasi kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (kbat) matematik: adakah suatu realiti? Sains Malaysiana, 50(9), 2781-2790.

    65. Musimartin, S. (2014). Amalan komuniti pembelajaran profesional (KPP) bagi tiga kategori prestasi sekolah rendah. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

    66. new york. http://www.labeee.ufsc.br/~luis/egcec/livros/globaliz/TheWorldIsFlat.pdf

    67. Nor Atika A. J., & Siew, N. M. (2022). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen pembelajaran abad ke-21 guru matematik sekolah menengah menggunakan model pengukuran rasch. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(3), e001319.https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i3.1319

    68. Nor Diana Mohd Idris, Junaidah Yusof, Fazli Abdul-Hamid, Muhamad Helmy Sabtu, Mohd

    69. Norazmi bin Nordin (2021). formation of special education leadership study questionnaire set that influences the task load and job satisfaction of special education teachers in malaysia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 5319-5323

    70. Nurzarina, A., & Roslinda, R. (2017, April 23-24) kefahaman guru tentang kemahiran abad ke-21. Prosiding Persidangan Antarabangsa Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan 2018, Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor.

    71. Nusrah, A. M., & Chan, Y. F. (2020). The effects of perceived leadership styles and emotional intelligence on attitude toward organizational change among secondary school teachers. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10295

    72. Nyamkhuu, T. dan Morohashi, J. (2019). "Challenges in integrating 21st century skills into education systems." education plus development. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/ education-plus-development/ 2019/02/05/ challenges in-integrating-21st-century- skills-into-education- system/

    73. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD. (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.

    74. Osman, M. R., & binti Maat, S. M. (2022). Efikasi Kendiri dan Sikap Guru Matematik terhadap Pengintegrasian Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(12), 1-13.

    75. Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st century skills: How to embed creativity into the curriculum. Sense Publishers.

    76. Puteri Nabila, M. R., Siti Nur Diyana, M. (2019). Kesan Kaedah Bermain Sambil Belajar Terhadap Minat, Pencapaian Dan Penglibatan Pelajar Berprestasi Rendah Dalam Akademik. In Norul Farihah, K., Munirah, A. R., Nur Asikin, M. N., Hasnah Am, A. Z., Hamizah H. (Eds.), 2nd Seminar Wacana Pendidikan 2019(Swapen 2.0) (pp. 271-280). Kolej Poly-Tech MARA Alor Setar.

    77. Qiao, X., Yu, S., & Zhang, L. (2018). A review of research on professional learning communities in mainland China (2006–2015). Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(5), 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217707523

    78. Radzi, N. M., Muzammil, R. N. F. (2018) Tahap kompetensi guru dalam pelaksanaan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di sekolah kebangsaan daerah Sepang, Selangor. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(4), 12-28.

    79. Rahim, S. S. A., Sulaiman, S., & Sulaiman, T. (2015). Teacher professional development through lesson study in secondary schools. Advanced Science Letters, 21(7), 2360-2364.

    80. Ramli, M. S., & Mohd Tajudin, N. (2021). Analisis keperluan untuk membangunkan Modul Pembelajaran Berasaskan Challenge dalam Mempelajari Matematik bagi murid tingkatan 4: Need analysis for developing a Challenge-Based Learning Module in learning Mathematics for form 4 students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11, 50–58.

    81. Ravitz, J. (2014). A Survey for Measuring 21st Century Teaching and Learning: West Virginia 21st Century Teaching and Learning Survey [WVDE-CIS-28]. Department of Education, West Virginia. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2246.6647

    82. Saad, K.A., Walsh, B.A., Mallaburn, A., & Brundrett, M. (2017). Exploring the implementation of a professional learning communities in Malaysian’s schools. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 2(5), 1-18.

    83. Sani, F. M., Abdullah, Z., & Sumintono, B. (2023). Menuju komuniti pembelajaran profesional: kajian kes di institusi tvet mara di malaysia. Educational Leader (Pemimpin Pendidikan), 85-104.

    84. Santibuana Binti Abd Rahman, Helvinder Kaur a/p Balbir Singh, Albert Feisal@Muhd Feisal bin Ismail, Salsuhaida binti Sulaiman, Mohd Norazmi bin Nordin (2021). Formation Of Special Education Leadership Study Interview Protocol That Affects the Task Load And Job Satisfaction of Special Education Teachers in Malaysia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(11), 5313-5318.

    85. Saracho, O. (2012). Creativity theories and related teachers’ beliefs. Early Child Development and Care, 182(1), 35– 44.

    86. Sargent, T. C., & Hannum, E. (2009). Doing more with less: Teacher professional learning communities in resource-constrained primary schools in rural China. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (3), 258-276.

    87. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of file learning organization. Century Business.

    88. Silva, J. E. Q., & Lazaro, J. L. C. (2020). The Digital competence of citizens: A growing need in a digitalized society. Edutec. Revista Electronica Technology Education 73, 37–50.

    89. Spiller, N. (2013). The relationship among profesional learning communitities, a response to intervention framework and Mathematics scores in middle and high schools. The University of Alabama.

    90. Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Open University Press.

    91. T. Subahan, M. M. (2007). Problem Solving and Human Capital. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Research and Education in Mathematics (ICREM3). INSPEM: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

    92. Tai, M. K., & Omar, A. K. (2018). Headteacher change leadership competency: A study in Malaysian primary schools. Professional Development in Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/19415257.2018.1561494

    93. Tai, M. K., & Omar, A. K. (2021). Identifying factors contributing to the development and sustainability of professional learning communities in Malaysian secondary schools. International Journal of Management in Education, 15(4), 337-361.

    94. Tengku Zawawi, T. Z. (1999). Kefahaman konsep dalam matematik. Jurnal Akademik MPKTBR. 11, 16 - 33.

    95. Thang, S. M., Murugaiah, P., Lee, K. W., Azman, H., Tan, L. Y., & Lee, Y. S. (2010). Grappling with technology: A case of supporting Malaysian smart school teachers’ professional development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 400-416.

    96. Thomas L. Friedman. (2006). A brief history of twenty-first century, farrar, straus and giroux, new york. http://www.labeee.ufsc.br/~luis/egcec/livros/globaliz/TheWorldIsFlat.pdf

    97. Wasylenki, K. (2020). A leadership challenge paper in support of unesco futures of education 2050: professional learning communities in a pandemic. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Faculty of Education, University of Alberta.

    98. Wilson, D. M., & Narasuman, S. (2020). Investigating teachers' implementation and strategies on higher order thinking skills in school based assessment instrument. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(1), 70-84.

    99. Yaakob, M. F. M., Hasbullah, H., Yunus, J. N., & Yusuf, H. (2017). Modelling professional learning community among Malaysian teachers. Man in India, 97 (24-II), 277-290.

    100. Yahaya, M., Hanafiah, R., Zakaria, N. S., Osman, R., & Bahrin, K. A. (2019). Amalan pembelajaran abad ke-21 (PAK-21) dalam pengajaran dan pemudahcaraan (PdPc) guru-guru sekolah rendah. Jurnal IPDA, 26, 13–24.

    101. Yasim, J. M., Mansor, A. N., & Ab Hamid, A. H. (2020). Kepimpinan instruksional abad Ke-21 dan amalan komuniti pembelajaran profesional dalam kalangan guru besar di Malaysia. Asean Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilization (ACER-J), 3(2). 21-37.

    102. Zarina Osman, Syahrul Anuar Ali, Salwati binti Su@Hassan, Kothai malar Nadaraja, Mohd Norazmi bin Nordin (2021). Special Education Leadership In Malaysia: A Review. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(11), 5324-5328.

    103. Zawawi, D. (2008). Cultural dimensions among Malaysian employees. International Journal of Economics and Management, 2(2), 409-426.