Assessing effectiveness: The CIPP model in automotive technology diploma curriculum implementation
List of Authors
  • Jamal @ Nordin Yunus , Muammar Shah Mukhter

Keyword
  • Vocational Education Transformation, Automotive Technology Diploma Curriculum, CIPP Evaluation Model

Abstract
  • The research highlights the Ministry of Education's commitment to transforming vocational education in Malaysia, emphasizing rebranding vocational schools to Vocational Colleges (KV) and implementing the Vocational Education Transformation since 2012. The study introduces the CIPP evaluation model for practical curriculum assessment. In the context of implementing the Automotive Technology Diploma (DTA) curriculum, it underscores the intricate interplay between various dimensions. The identified factors offer insights for DTA lecturers, and future research proposals include exploring innovative pedagogical approaches and assessing industry partnerships. The study lays the groundwork for ongoing enhancements in vocational education.

Reference
  • 1. Abu Hassan, M. A., & Musa, K. (2020). Tahap profesionalisme guru sekolah kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia. Management Research Journal, 9(2), 37–45. Retrieved from https://ojs.upsi.edu.my/index.php/MRJ/article/view/3536

    2. Alkin, M. C. (1969). Evaluating theory development. Evaluation Comment 2:2-7.

    3. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (5th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education

    4. Ghazali Darussalam, Othman Talib & Normah Idris. (2017). Penilaian Program dalam Pendidikan & Sains Sosial. Selangor: Penerbitan Universiti Putra Malaysia.

    5. Ismail Kailani & Wantrudis C. M. (2012). Prospective Secondary Teachers’ Beliefs About Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 1-13.

    6. Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. (2009) Curriculum Design. In Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues (5th Ed.), pp. 181-206. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

    7. Ornstein, A.,C , & Hunskin, F.,P .(2009). Curriculum foundations, principles and issues. (5th ed.). USA:Pearson.

    8. Rossi, P.,H, Lipsey, M.,W, and Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation a systematic approach (7nd ed.). UK: Sage Publication.

    9. Sinnott, G. C., Madison, G. H., & Pataki, G. E. (2002). Competencies: Report of the Competencies Workgroup, Workforce and Succession Planning Work Groups, New York: New York State Governor's Office of Employee Relations and the Department of Civil Service.

    10. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Portland, Oregon: Annual Conference on the Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN).

    11. Surayah Zaidon dan Haslinda Md. Ali. (2009). Penilaian dalam pendidikan prasekolah, Kuala Lumpur: PTS Profesional

    12. Worthen, B.R., & Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines(2nd ed.), New York: Longman

    13. Yahaya, A., Ramli, J., Hashim, S., & Yahaya, N. (2008). Sejaumanakah Model Stufflebeam ( KIPP ) boleh Membantu dalam Penilaian Program Pembelajaran ? In Y. Boon & J. Ramli (Eds.), Isu-Isu Psikologi Pembangunan Diri (p. pg 188–209). Penerbit UTM.