1. Arifin, S.R.M., 2018. Ethical considerations in a qualitative study. International Journal of Care Scholars, 1(2), pp.30-33.
2. Aseeri, M.M.Y., 2020. Abstract Thinking of Practicum Students at Najran University in Light of Piaget's Theory and Its Relation to Their Academic Level. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 9(1), pp.63-72. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1248096.pdf
3. Billingsley, J.T. and Hurd, N.M., 2019. Discrimination, mental health, and academic performance among underrepresented college students: the role of extracurricular activities at predominantly white institutions. Social Psychology of Education, 22(2), pp.421-446.
4. Bouncken, R.B., Qiu, Y., Sinkovics, N. and Kürsten, W., 2021. Qualitative research: extending the range with flexible pattern matching. Review of Managerial Science, 15(2), pp.251-273. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11846-021-00451-2.pdf
5. Breive, S., 2020. Student–teacher dialectic in the co-creation of a zone of proximal development: An example from kindergarten mathematics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(3), pp.413-423. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1755498
6. Buckley, P. and Lee, P., 2021. The impact of the extra-curricular activity on the student experience. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), pp.37-48.
7. Cao, A., Xue, C. and Zhu, W., 2020, April. Application of Big Data in the Management System of “Second Classroom Education” Platform in Universities. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1533, No. 4, p. 042069). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1533/4/042069/pdf
8. Christison, C. (2022) The benefits of participating in extracurricular activities ... - ed. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1230758.pdf (Accessed: November 21, 2022).
9. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B. and Osher, D., 2020. Implications for the educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), pp.97-140. DOI: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
10. Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S. and Giri, R.A., 2021. Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Online Submission, 2(2), pp.25-36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED611786.pdf
11. Doo, M.Y., Bonk, C. and Heo, H., 2020. A meta-analysis of scaffolding effects in online learning in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), pp.60-80. Available at: https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/irrodl/1900-v1-n1-irrodl05527/1071712ar.pdf
12. Farrukh, M., Alzubi, Y., Shahzad, I.A., Waheed, A. and Kanwal, N., 2018. Entrepreneurial intentions: The role of personality traits in perspective of the theory of planned behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. DOI: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/APJIE-01-2018-0004/full/html
13. Hafsa, N.E., 2019. Mixed methods research: An overview for beginner researchers. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 58(1), pp.p45-48. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nur-E-Hafsa/publication/338751170_Mixed_Methods_Research_An_Overview_for_Beginner_Researchers/links/5e287c1192851c3aadd21778/Mixed-Methods-Research-An-Overview-for-Beginner-Researchers.pdf
14. Hanfstingl, B., Benke, G. and Zhang, Y., 2019. Comparing variation theory with Piaget’s theory of cognitive development: more similarities than differences? Educational Action Research, 27(4), pp.511-526. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara-Hanfstingl/publication/330321812_Comparing_variation_theory_with_Piaget's_theory_of_cognitive_development_more_similarities_than_differences/links/5c9b130292851cf0ae9a046a/Comparing-variation-theory-with-Piagets-theory-of-cognitive-development-more-similarities-than-differences.pdf
15. Hanfstingl, B., Benke, G. and Zhang, Y., 2019. Comparing variation theory with Piaget’s theory of cognitive development: more similarities than differences? Educational Action Research,
16. Hidayati, N.A., Waluyo, H.J. and Winarni, R., 2020. Exploring the Implementation of Local Wisdom-Based Character Education among Indonesian Higher Education Students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), pp.179-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v6n5.959
17. Hordósy, R. and Clark, T., 2018. Beyond the compulsory: a critical exploration of the experiences of extracurricular activity and employability in a northern red brick university. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 23(3), pp.414-435. https://www.bbc.com/news/38261706
18. Huang, B., Hew, K.F. and Lo, C.K., 2019. Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioural and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), pp.1106-1126. DOI: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653
19. Hudson-Miles, R., 2021. Is it Simple to Be a Marxist in Pedagogy? by David Backer, Leiden and Boston, Brill, 2019, 82 pp., € 45.00 (paperback), ISBN 978-90-04-39468-1. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(4), pp.669-676.
20. Islam, M.A. and Aldaihani, F.M.F., 2022. Justification for Adopting Qualitative Research Method, Research Approaches, Sampling Strategy, Sample Size, Interview Method, Saturation, and Data Analysis. Journal of International Business and Management, 5(1), pp.01-11. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Md-Islam-394/publication/357352896_Justification_for_Adopting_Qualitative_Research_Method_Research_Approaches_Sampling_Strategy_Sample_Size_Interview_Method_Saturation_and_Data_Analysis/links/61c9ed5ab8305f7c4b05d50c/Justification-for-Adopting-Qualitative-Research-Method-Research-Approaches-Sampling-Strategy-Sample-Size-Interview-Method-Saturation-and-Data-Analysis.pdf
21. Janson, A., Sӧllner, M. and Leimeister, J.M., 2020. Ladders for learning: is scaffolding the key to teaching problem-solving in technology-mediated learning contexts? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(4), pp.439-468. Available at: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/257754/1/JML_802.pdf
22. Kaliyadan, F. and Kulkarni, V., 2019. Types of variables, descriptive statistics, and sample size. Indian dermatology online journal, 10(1), p.82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362742/pdf/IDOJ-10-82.pdf
23. Kaur, P., Stoltzfus, J. and Yellapu, V., 2018. Descriptive statistics. International Journal of Academic Medicine, 4(1), p.60. https://www.ijam-web.org/temp/IntJAcadMed4160-3572861_095528.pdf
24. Keiler, L.S., 2018. Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centred classrooms. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), pp.1-20. DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
25. King, A.E., McQuarrie, F.A. and Brigham, S.M., 2021. Exploring the relationship between student success and participation in extracurricular activities. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 36(1-2), pp.42-58.
26. Kiger, M.E. and Varpio, L., 2020. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8), pp.846-854. https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/18/18247/Kiger_and_Varpio__2020__Thematic_analysis_of_qualitative_data_AMEE_Guide_No_131.pdf
27. Liu, F., 2019. Construction of the Teaching Model of Second Classroom of Translation Based on Network Platform. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(02), p.167. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2019.72014
28. Lu, Y. and Liu, H., 2018, October. Construction of the Course System of Mechanical and Electronic Specialty for Applied Undergraduate Course--Teaching Direction of Industrial Robot. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 423, No. 1, p. 012109). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/423/1/012109/pdf
29. Mahmutovic, J. (2022) How to use social media surveys (+ benefits & TIPS), SurveyLegend. Available at: https://www.surveylegend.com/online-survey/how-to-use-social-media-surveys-benefits-tips/ (Accessed: November 21, 2022).
30. Mania, H., Guy, A. and Recht, B., 2018. A simple random search of static linear policies is competitive for reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/hash/7634ea65a4e6d9041cfd3f7de18e334a-Abstract.html
31. Mania, H., Guy, A. and Recht, B., 2018. Simple random search provides a competitive approach to reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07055. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.07055
32. Mishra, A.K., Gopesh, A. and Singh, K.P., 2020. Acute toxic effects of chlorpyrifos on the pseudobranchial neurosecretory system, brain regions and locomotory behaviour of an air-breathing catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch 1794). Drug and Chemical Toxicology, pp.1-10. DOI: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01480545.2020.1762631
33. Mishra, P., Pandey, C.M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C. and Keshri, A., 2019. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of cardiac anaesthesia, 22(1), p.67. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350423/pdf/ACA-22-67.pdf
34. Quintão, C., Andrade, P. and Almeida, F., 2020. How to Improve the Validity and Reliability of a Case My Study Approach? Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 9(2), pp.264-275. https://www.ojed.org/index.php/jise/article/view/2026
35. Patel, M. and Patel, N., 2019. Exploring Research Methodology. International Journal of Research and Review, 6(3), pp.48-55. https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.6_Issue.3_March2019/Abstract_IJRR0011.html
36. Pathan, H., Memon, R.A., Memon, S., Khoso, A.R. and Bux, I., 2018. A critical review of Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory in second language acquisition. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), p.232. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5b3c/45a0501362ead471c180f2534964d0ef331f.pdf
37. Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Tuominen, M. and Tirri, K., 2019. In search of a growth mindset pedagogy: A case study of one teacher's classroom practices in a Finnish elementary College. Teaching and teacher education, 77, pp.204-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.002
38. Rui, Z. (2022). Research on the evaluation system of ideological and political education of college students based on a decision system. Soft Computing, 1-8. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00500-022-07003-0.pdf
39. Rutberg, S. and Bouikidis, C.D., 2018. Focusing on the fundamentals: A simplistic differentiation between qualitative and quantitative research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2), pp.209-213. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shannon-Rutberg/publication/328250766_Focusing_on_the_Fundamentals_A_Simplistic_Differentiation_Between_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Research/links/5eea3789299bf1faac5e6bfb/Focusing-on-the-Fundamentals-A-Simplistic-Differentiation-Between-Qualitative-and-Quantitative-Research.pdf
40. Sahin, M.D. and Öztürk, G., 2019. Mixed Method Research: Theoretical Foundations, Designs and Its Use in Educational Research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(2), pp.301-310. http://ijcer.net/en/download/article-file/880619
41. Scharp, K. M., & Sanders, M. L. (2019). What is a theme? Teaching thematic analysis in qualitative communication research methods. Communication Teacher, 33(2), 117-121. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kristina-Scharp/publication/328675228_What_is_a_theme_Teaching_thematic_analysis_in_qualitative_communication_research_methods/links/5be360a392851c6b27aee2f6/What-is-a-theme-Teaching-thematic-analysis-in-qualitative-communication-research-methods.pdf