The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on financial outcomes: The moderating role of board characteristics in Malaysian firms
List of Authors
  • Yanti Mustapha

Keyword
  • ESG performance, financial performance, board size, board gender diversity, corporate governance

Abstract
  • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors are becoming more widely acknowledged as essential elements of corporate performance. The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between ESG performance and financial results, with a particular emphasis on businesses located in Malaysia. This study investigates the ways in which the characteristics of boards, specifically the size of boards and the gender diversity of board members, modify this relationship. Using data from 346 Malaysian enterprises, the study discovers a link between ESG performance and operating income. The association between ESG and financial results is strengthened by larger board sizes, whereas board gender diversity does not have a meaningful influence on moderating this relationship. The findings provide insights into corporate governance practices, suggesting that larger boards can amplify the financial benefits of strong ESG performance.

Reference
  • 1. Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., & Roni, N. N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent OA, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1900500

    2. Alanazi, A. S. (2019). Corporate governance and the characteristics of the board of directors: Evidence from an emerging market. Publishing house "Virtus Interpress", 15(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv15i1art2

    3. Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., & Khare, N. (2018). The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate Financial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 10(2), 494-494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020494

    4. Arayssi, M., Dah, M. A., & Jizi, M. (2016). Women on boards, sustainability reporting and firm performance. Emerald Publishing Limited, 7(3), 376-401. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-07-2015-0055

    5. Atz, U., Van Holt, T., Liu, Z. Z., & Bruno, C. C. (2022). Does sustainability generate better financial performance? review, meta-analysis, and propositions. Taylor & Francis, 13(1), 802-825. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2106934

    6. Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Elsevier BV, 22, S119-S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006

    7. Bashir, I., Hassan, M., & Arif, M. (2022). Integrating the Relationship between Stakeholder’s Perspective and Corporate Sustainability: A Literature Review. 8(2). https://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v8i2.2372

    8. Birindelli, G., Dell'Atti, S., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2018). Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 10(12), 4699-4699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124699

    9. Chams, N., & García-Blandón, J. (2019). Sustainable or not sustainable? The role of the board of directors. Elsevier BV, 226, 1067-1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.118

    10. Cicchiello, A. F., Fellegara, A. M., Kazemikhasragh, A., & Monferrà, S. (2021). Gender diversity on corporate boards: How Asian and African women contribute on sustainability reporting activity. Emerald Publishing Limited, 36(7), 801-820. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-05-2020-0147

    11. Clement, R. W. (2023). The lessons from stakeholder theory for U.S. business leaders. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681304001284

    12. Cohen, G. (2023). The impact of ESG risks on corporate value. Springer Science+Business Media, 60(4), 1451-1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01135-6

    13. Crespi, F., & Migliavacca, M. (2020). The Determinants of ESG Rating in the Financial Industry: The Same Old Story or a Different Tale? Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 12(16), 6398-6398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166398

    14. Đặng, R., Houanti, L. h., Reddy, K., & Simioni, M. (2020). Does board gender diversity influence firm profitability? A control function approach. Elsevier BV, 90, 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.05.009

    15. Dhir, A., Khan, S. J., Islam, N., Ractham, P., & Meenakshi, N. (2023). Drivers of sustainable business model innovations. An upper echelon theory perspective. Elsevier BV, 191, 122409-122409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122409

    16. Fulton, M. R., Kahn, B. M., & Sharples, C. (2012). Sustainable Investing: Establishing Long-Term Value and Performance. RELX Group (Netherlands). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2222740

    17. Ghaeli, M. R. (2019). The role of gender in corporate governance: A state-of-art review. Growing Science, 31-34. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2018.6.002

    18. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change. Wiley, 37(2), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179

    19. Kang, W., & Jung, M. (2020). Effect of ESG Activities and Firm’s Financial Characteristics. 49(5), 681-707. https://doi.org/10.26845/kjfs.2020.10.49.5.681

    20. Kee, H. W., Li, N. S., Sidik, V. N. M., Seng, N. F., & Devi, S. S. (2020). Corporate Characteristics and ESG Disclosures in Malaysian Public-Listed Companies. 8(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.73.2020.81.91.109

    21. Khan, M. (2019). Corporate Governance, ESG, and Stock Returns around the World. Taylor & Francis, 75(4), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198x.2019.1654299

    22. Kim, D. H., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards: Do Women Contribute Unique Skills? American Economic Association, 106(5), 267-271. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161032

    23. Kulal, A., Abhishek, N., Dinesh, S., & M.s, D. (2023). Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Factors on Stock Prices and Investment Performance. 5(2), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.30564/mmpp.v5i2.5659

    24. Kumar, R., Ting, I. W. K., Sujit, K. S., & Sumod, S. D. (2020). Environmental, social and governance initiatives and wealth creation for firms: An empirical examination. Wiley, 41(5), 710-729. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3131

    25. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us. SAGE Publishing, 34(6), 1152-1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324322

    26. Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Elsevier BV, 237, 117727-117727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727

    27. Noja, G. G., Thalassinos, E., Cristea, M., & Grecu, I. M. (2021). The Interplay between Board Characteristics, Financial Performance, and Risk Management Disclosure in the Financial Services Sector: New Empirical Evidence from Europe. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 14(2), 79-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020079

    28. Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., & Álvarez, I. G. (2019). Do board characteristics drive firm performance? An international perspective. Springer Science+Business Media, 14(6), 1251-1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00330-x

    29. Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) Performance and Board Gender Diversity: The Moderating Role of CEO Duality. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 12(21), 9298-9298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219298

    30. Sempere-Ripoll, F., Miguel, S. E., Rojas-Alvarado, R., & Hervás-Oliver, J.-L. (2020). Does Technological Innovation Drive Corporate Sustainability? Empirical Evidence for the European Financial Industry in Catching-Up and Central and Eastern Europe Countries. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 12(6), 2261-2261. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062261

    31. Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Elsevier BV, 72, 102144-102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144

    32. Slater, S. F., Weigand, R. A., & Zwirlein, T. J. (2008). The business case for commitment to diversity. Elsevier BV, 51(3), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.01.003

    33. Ting, I. W. K., Azizan, N. A., Kumar, R., & Sujit, K. S. (2019). Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance: Comparative Study among Developed and Emerging Market Firms. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 12(1), 26-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010026

    34. Wu, X. (2023). The Impact of ESG Ratings on Trade Credit Financing. EDP Sciences, 169, 01068-01068. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316901068

    35. Zaccone, M. C., & Pedrini, M. (2020). ESG Factor Integration into Private Equity. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 12(14), 5725-5725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145725

    36. Zhan, S. (2023). ESG and Corporate Performance: A Review. EDP Sciences, 169, 01064-01064. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316901064

    37. Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2022). Does ESG Performance Enhance Financial Flexibility? Evidence from China. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 14(18), 11324-11324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811324