The challenges and strategies of instructional coaching implementation in schools: A systematic literature review
List of Authors
  • Ahmad Zabidi Abdul Razak , Azzarina Anor Basah

Keyword
  • Instructional Coaching, Coaches, Professional Development, Leadership, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract
  • In the teaching profession, instructional coaching is a part of Professional Development (PD) programs. Detailed systematic reviews of instructional coaching strategies are scarce, complicating the current research. Consequently, this study aims to conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) regarding challenges and strategies in instructional coaching implementation to find the most effective coaching practises. The review processes include five key methodological steps, as outlined in the systematic review: formulation of Research Questions (RQs); systematic searching strategies based on 'identification', 'screening', 'eligibility', and finally 'data extraction' and 'data analysis'. Overall, eight themes were discovered based on two RQs. Under challenges, four themes stood out: (C1) organisation; (C2) teacher learning; (C3) the coaching process; and (C4) relationships. Note that the strategies of the other four themes were as follows: (S1) coaching support; (S2) roles; (S3) capacity building; and (S4) social. This review enables scholars to understand the implementation challenges and strategies better and improve the quality and effectiveness of instructional coaching.

Reference
  • 1. Ahmad Fauzi Ahmad. (2014). Kepimpinan instruksional dalam peningkatan pengajaran dan pembelajaran yang berkesan dalam kalangan pensyarah. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

    2. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 19416520903053598

    3. Bean, R. M., Draper, J. A., & Hall, V. (2010). Coaches and coaching in reading first schools: A reality check. Elementary School Journal, 111, 87–114.

    4. Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111, 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/653468

    5. Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2015). Exploring mechanisms of effective teacher coaching: A tale of two cohorts from a randomized experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 542–566. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715579487

    6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

    7. Broin, A. O., & Palmer, S. (2010). Exploring key aspects in the formation of coaching relationships: initial indicators from the perspective of the coachee and the coach. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3(2), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2010.502902

    8. Bruns, B., Costa, L., & Cunha, N. (2018). Through the looking glass: Can classroom observation and coaching improve teacher performance in Brazil? Economics of Education Review, 64(June 2017), 214–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.003

    9. Butler, Y. G., & Yeum, K. (2016). Dialogic competence of primary school english teachers in online peer coaching: A case study in South Korea. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 13(2), 72–89.

    10. Carlisle, J. F., & Features, S. (2011). Literacy coaching as a component of professional development. Reading & Witing Quarterly, 24, 773–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9224-4

    11. Chaaban, Y., & Abu-Tineh, A. (2017). Instructional coaches’ perceptions of professional development: An exploration of the Qatari school-based support program. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 6(4), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2016-0079

    12. Clarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. In Review of Educational Research (Vol. 84, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499618

    13. Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: how teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.

    14. Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers ’ social networks (Vol. 30, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373708321829

    15. Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.008

    16. Collet, V. S. (2015). The gradual increase of responsibility model for coaching teachers: scaffolds for change. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-06-2015-0017

    17. Connor, C. M. D. (2017). Commentary on the special issue on instructional coaching models: Common elements of effective coaching models. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1274575

    18. Damore, S. J., & Rieckhoff, B. S. (2019). School Leader Perceptions: Coaching Tool and Process. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(5), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775119868258

    19. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: How Successful School Leaders Use Transformational and Instructional Strategies to Make a Difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863

    20. Denton, C. A., & Hasbrouck, J. (2009). A description of instructional coaching and its relationship to consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19(2), 150–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410802463296

    21. Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional Coaching as High-Quality Professional Development. Theory into Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947

    22. Deussen, T., Coski, T., Robinson, L., & Autio, E. (2007). “Coach” can mean many things: five categories of literacy coaches in reading first. REL Northwest, 5(2007), 1–37.

    23. Dixon-woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence : a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy, 10(1), 45–53.

    24. Domina, T., Lewis, R., Agarwal, P., & Hanselman, P. (2015). Professional Sense-Makers: Instructional Specialists in Contemporary Schooling. Educational Researcher, 44(6), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15601644

    25. Dufour, R., & Marzano, R. J. (2011). Leaders of learning: How district, school and classroom leaders improve student achievement. Solution Tree Press.

    26. Durand, F. T., Lawson, H. A., Wilcox, K. C., & Schiller, K. S. (2016). The role of district office leaders in the adoption and implementation of the Common Core State Standards in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15615391

    27. Elrod, M. J. (2017). Exploring mathematics teacher education fieldwork experiences through storytelling. Retrieved form ProQuest Digital Dissertations. University of South Florida.

    28. Fallon, L. M., Collier-Meek, M. A., & Kurtz, K. D. (2019). Feasible coaching supports to promote teachers’ classroom management in high-need settings: An experimental single case design study. School Psychology Review, 48(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0135.V48-1

    29. Finnigan, K. S., & Daly, A. J. (2010). Learning at a system level: Ties between principals and low-performing schools and central office leaders. In A. J. Daly (Ed.),. In Social-network theory and educational change (pp. 179–196). Harvard Education Press.

    30. Fleisch, B., Schöer, V., Roberts, G., & Thornton, A. (2016). System-wide improvement of early-grade mathematics: New evidence from the Gauteng Primary Language and Mathematics Strategy. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.02.006

    31. Frank, K. A., Penuel, W. R., & Krause, A. (2015). What is a “good” social network for policy implementation? The flow of know-how for organizational change. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2), 378–402.

    32. Frazier, R. A. (2018). The impact of instructional coaching on teacher competency, job satisfaction and student growth (Vol. 53, Issue 9). University of Colorado.

    33. Furman, M., Luzuriaga, M., Taylor, I., & Podestá, M. E. (2021). How does coaching influence teacher implementation of a science programme? Evidence from an experimental study. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-09-2020-0059

    34. Galey, S. (2016). The evolving role of instructional coaches in U.S. policy contexts. The William & Mary Educational Review, 4(2), 11.

    35. Galeyhorn, S. (2020). Capacity-building for district reform: The role of instructional-coach teams. Teachers College Record, 122(10), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201003

    36. Gallant, A., & Gilham, V. (2014). Differentiated coaching : Developmental needs of coachees. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2013-0059

    37. Gallucci, C., DeVoogt van Lare, M., Yoon, I. H., & Boatright, B. (2010). Instructional coaching: Building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 919–963. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210371497

    38. Glover, T. A., & Reddy, L. A. (2017). This Issue. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1262156

    39. Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., Bailes, L. P., & Nichols, R. (2019). From school leadership to differentiated instruction: A pathway to student learning in schools. Elementary School Journal, 120(2), 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1086/705827

    40. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar , PubMed , and 26 other resources. Wiley, August 2019, 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378

    41. Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018). ROSES Reporting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7

    42. Hannan, M. Q., & Russell, J. L. (2020). Coaching in context: Exploring conditions that shape instructional coaching practice. Teachers College Record, 122(10), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201002

    43. Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Solidarity with solidity: The case for collaborative professionalism. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0031721718797116

    44. Hargreaves, B. A., & Connor, M. T. O. (2018). Solidarity with solidity : The case for collaborative professionalism. Delta Kappan, 100(1), 20–24.

    45. Hart, A. E. (2018). Exploring the interpersonal dynamics of the supervisory triad of preservice teacher education: A qualitative meta-synthesis. (Doctoral dissertation) [Kennesaw State University]. https://doi.org/Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2NLDvMb.

    46. Hashim, A. K. (2020). Coaching and districtwide improvement: Exploring the systemic leadership practices of instructional coaches. Teachers College Record, 122(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201005

    47. Hayrol Azril Mohamed Shaffril, Krauss, S. E., & Samsul Farid Samsuddin. (2018). A systematic review on Asian’s farmers’ adaptation practices towards climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 644, 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.349

    48. Heineke, S. F. (2013). Coaching discourse: Supporting teachers’ professionla learning. Elementary School Journal, 113(3), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1086/668767

    49. Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2011). Applying mixed methods research at the synthesis level: an overview. Res Sch, 18(1), 12–24.

    50. Higgins, S. L. (2017). Teachers appraisal of their relationship with instructional coaches and interpretation of the instructional coaches role. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. University of Southern Mississippi.

    51. Hopkins, M., Ozimek, D., & Sweet, T. M. (2016). Mathematics coaching and instructional reform: Individual and collective change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 215–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.11.003

    52. Houchens, G. W., Stewart, T. A., & Jennings, S. (2017). Enhancing instructional leadership through collaborative coaching: a multi-case study. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3(20), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-07-2016-0057

    53. Isner, T., Tout, K., Zaslow, M., Soli, M., Quinn, K., Rothenberg, L., & Burkhauser, M. (2011). Coaching in early care and education programs and Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS): Identifying promising features (Issue February, p. 83). Child Trends.

    54. Jacobs, J., Boardman, A., Potvin, A., & Wang, C. (2018). Understanding teacher resistance to instructional coaching. Professional Development in Education, 44(5), 690–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1388270

    55. Jakopovic, P. M. (2021). Coaching to develop teacher professional noticing: planning with students and mathematics in mind. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-10-2020-0064

    56. Jones, G. (2018). Evidens-based school leadership and management: A practical guide. SAGE Publication.

    57. Jong, L. De, Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). School-based collaboration as a learning context for teachers : A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 112(January), 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101927

    58. Kane, B. D., & Rosenquist, B. (2019). Relationships between instructional coaches’ time use and district- and school-level policies and expectations. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1718–1768. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219826580

    59. Kho, S. H., Saeed, K. M., & Mohamed, A. R. (2019). Instructional coaching as a tool for professional development: Coaches’ roles and considerations. Qualitative Report, 24(5), 1106–1131.

    60. Kickbusch, S., & Kelly, N. (2021). Representing teacher coaching sessions: understanding coaching that develops teachers’ capability to design for learning. I, 10(4), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-01-2021-0011

    61. Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

    62. Knight, D., Hock, M., Skrtic, T. M., Bradley, B. A., & Knight, J. (2018). Evaluation of video-based instructional coaching for middle school teachers: Evidence from a multiple baseline study. Educational Forum, 82(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1474985

    63. Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. In Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.

    64. Knight, J. (2016). Teach to Win: Seven success factors for instructional coaching programs. The Education Digest, 81(5), 27–32.

    65. Knight, J. (2018). Praise for The Impact Cycle. Corwin.

    66. Knight, J., & van Nieuwerburgh, C. (2012). Instructional coaching: A focus on practice. Coaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2012.707668

    67. Kotze, J., Fleisch, B., & Taylor, S. (2019). Alternative forms of early grade instructional coaching: Emerging evidence from field experiments in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 66(July 2018), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.09.004

    68. Kraft, M. A., & Blazar, D. (2017). Individualized coaching to improve teacher practice across grades and subjects: new experimental evidence. In Educational Policy (Vol. 31, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816631099

    69. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Researchgullo, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268

    70. Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journa, 16, 1023–1042.

    71. Kurz, A., Reddy, L. A., & Glover, T. A. (2017). A multidisciplinary framework of instructional coaching. Theory Into Practice, 56, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1260404

    72. Kurz, A., Reddy, L. A., Glover, T. A., & Kurz, A. (2017). A multidisciplinary framework of instructional coaching. 56(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1260404

    73. Kutnick, P., Gartland, C., & Good, D. (2022). Evaluating a programme for the continuing professional development of STEM teachers working within inclusive secondary schools in the UK. International Journal of Educational Research, 113(December 2021), 101974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101974

    74. Lee, R. J. (2013). The role of contracting in coaching: balancing individual client and organizational issues”, in Passmore, J., Peterson, D.B. and Friere, T. (Eds). In The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Coaching and Mentoring (pp. 40–57). Wiley-Blackwell, UK.

    75. Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers ’ communities of practice : opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917–946.

    76. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-BasedHealthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https:// doi.org/10.1097/ XEB.000000000062

    77. Lofthouse, R. (2019). Coaching in education: a professional development process in formation. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/ 19415257. 2018. 1529611

    78. Lofthouse, R., Rose, A., & Whiteside, R. (2021). Understanding coaching efficacy in education through activity systems: privileging the nuances of provision. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, example 2. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2021-0036

    79. Lowenhaupt, R., McKinney, S., & Reeves, T. (2014). Coaching in context: The role of relationships in the work of three literacy coaches. Professional Development in Education, 40(5), 740–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.847475

    80. Mangin, M. M. (2009). Literacy coach role implementation: How district context influences reform efforts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(5), 759–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X09347731

    81. Mangin, M. M., & Dunsmore, K. L. (2015). How the framing of instructional coaching as a lever for systemic or individual reform influences the enactment of coaching. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(2), 179–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X14522814

    82. Markussen-Brown, J., Juhl, C. B., Piasta, S. B., Bleses, D., Højen, A., & Justice, L. M. (2017). The effects of language- and literacy-focused professional development on early educators and children: A best-evidence meta-analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 38, 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.07.002

    83. Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Resnick, L. B. (2010). Implementing literacy coaching: The role of school social resources. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 249–272. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710363743

    84. Mckim, C. A. (2017). TThe value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. J Mixed Methods Res, 11(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607096

    85. Mestry, R., Moonsammy-Koopasammy, I., & Schmidt, M. (2013). The instructional leadership role of primary school principals. Education as Change, 17(SUPPL.1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2014.865990

    86. Mizell, H. (2010). Why Professional development matter. In learningForward.org. Oxford: Learningn Forward.

    87. Mudzimiri, R., Burroughs, E. A., Luebeck, J., Sutton, J., & Yopp, D. (2014). A look inside mathematics coaching: Roles, content, and dynamics. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(53), 1–32.

    88. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

    89. Oluwatoyin, C., Abosede, O. C., & Abubakar, A. (2018). Teaching-Learning Process : A Veritable Tool for Classroom Management in Kwara State Secondary Schools. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(1).

    90. Pas, E. T., Larson, K. E., Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2016). Implementation and acceptability of an adapted Classroom Check-Up coaching model to promote culturally responsive classroom management. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 467–492.

    91. Picus, L. O., Odden, A. R., & Picus, L. O. (2011). Reinventing school finance: Falling forward. Peabody Journal of Education, 86(3), 291–303.

    92. Piper, B., Simmons Zuilkowski, S., Dubeck, M., Jepkemei, E., & King, S. J. (2018). Identifying the essential ingredients to literacy and numeracy improvement: Teacher professional development and coaching, student textbooks, and structured teachers’ guides. World Development, 106, 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.018

    93. Popova, A., Evans, D. K., & Arancibia, V. (2016). Training teachers on the job: What works and how to measure it. Training Teachers on the Job: What Works and How to Measure It. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7834

    94. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency; an ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury.

    95. Reddy, L. A., Dudek, C. M., & Lekwa, A. (2017). Classroom Strategies Coaching Model: Integration of Formative Assessment and Instructional Coaching. In Theory into Practice (Vol. 56, Issue 1, pp. 46–55). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080 /00405841.2016.1241944

    96. Reddy, L. A., Glover, T., Kurz, A., & Elliott, S. N. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness and interactions of instructional coaches: initial psychometric evidence for the instructional coaching assessments–teacher forms. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 44(2), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418771739

    97. Reiss, K. J. (2015). Leadership coaching for educators: Bringing out the best in school administrator. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    98. Robertson, D. A., Ford-Connors, E., Frahm, T., Bock, K., & Paratore, J. R. (2020). Unpacking productive coaching interactions: identifying coaching approaches that support instructional uptake. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1634628

    99. Russell, J. L., Correnti, R., Stein, M. K., Bill, V., Hannan, M., Schwartz, N., Booker, L. N., Pratt, N. R., & Matthis, C. (2020). Learning from adaptation to support instructional improvement at scale: Understanding coach adaptation in the TN Mathematics Coaching Project. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 148–187. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219854050

    100. Saclarides, E. S. (2021). An exploration of challenges and support when coaches model instruction for teachers. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2021-0032

    101. Sam, C. H., & Caliendo, A. E. (2018). Using activity theory to understand the role of the coach in K–12 curriculum redevelopment. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7(3), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-07-2017-0048

    102. Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Barroso, Ju. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Res Sch, 13(1), 29–40.

    103. Shaffril, H. A. M., Abu, S. A., & Kamarudin, S. (2021). Speaking of the devil: a systematic literature review on community preparedness for earthquakes. Natural Hazards, 108(3), 2421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04867-7

    104. Shaffril, H. A. M., Samah, A. A., & Samsuddin, S. F. (2021). Guidelines for developing a systematic literature review for studies related to climate change adaptation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019.

    105. Snilstveit, B., Stevenson, J., Menon, R., Phillips, D., Gallagher, E., Geleen, M., Jobse, H., Schmidt, T., & Jimenez, E. (2016). The impact of education programmes on learning and school participation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation. Education Systematic Review Summary 7. https://3ieimpact.org/sites/default/files/2019-01/srs7-education-report.pdf

    106. Spelman, M., Bell, D., Thomas, E., & Briody, J. (2016). Combining professional development & instructional coaching to transform teh classroom environment in PreK-3 classroom. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 9(1), 30–46.

    107. Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.

    108. Strieker, T., Adams, M., Lim, W., & Wright, M. (2017). Using discourse to understand the relationships and practices of pre-service co-teachers. Georgia Educational Researcher, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2017.140102

    109. Strieker, T., Lim, W., Rosengrant, D., & Wright, M. (2020). Promising practices in coaching co-taught preservice clinical experiences. Athens Journal of Education, 7(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.7-1-1

    110. Strieker, T. S., Shaheen, M., Hubbard, D., Digiovanni, L., & Lim, W. (2014). Transforming clinical practice through coaching pre-service co-teaching. Educational Renaissance, 1(2), 39–62.

    111. Tantalo, F. (2017). Secondary School Principals and Leadership Coaching.

    112. Tarwiyah, S., Warsono, W., Linggar Bharati, D. A., & Sutopo, D. (2018). Professional learning through coaching: toward the enhancement of the teachers’ pedagogical competence. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.30

    113. Teemant, A. (2014). A mixed-methods investigation of instructional coaching for teachers of diverse learners. Urban Education, 49(5), 574–604. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 0042085913481362

    114. West, L., & Staub, F. C. (2003). Content-focused coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(6), 335–336.

    115. Wetzel, M., Hoffman, J. V, Maloch, B., Vlach, S. K., Taylor, L. A., Sue, N., Dejulio, S., Martinez, A., & Lavender, H. (2017). Coaching elementary preservice teachers: hybrid spaces for cooperating teachers and university field supervisors to collaborate”. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2017-0074

    116. Wise, D., & Cavazos, B. (2017). Leadership coaching for principals: a national study. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13611267.2017.1327690

    117. Woulfin, S. L. (2020). Crystallizing coaching: An examination of the institutionalization of instructional coaching in three educational systems. Teachers College Record, 122(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201006

    118. Woulfin, S. L., & Jones, B. (2018). Rooted in relationships: An analysis of dimensions of social capital enabling instructional coaching. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-07-2017-0017

    119. Woulfin, S. L., & Rigby, J. G. (2017). Coaching for coherence: How instructional coaches lead change in the evaluation era. ..Educational Researcher, 46(6), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17725525

    120. York-barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255

    121. Zilber, T. (2008). The work meanings in institutional processes and thinking. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.),. In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 151–169). SAGE.