Teachers as curriculum leaders: what does this mean to school principals?
List of Authors
  • Bessong, Rebecca

Keyword
  • School principals, teacher leadership, distributed leadership, curriculum leadership, Grant’s model

Abstract
  • School leadership and accountability are usually the responsibilities of principals. Principals are expected to lead and manage in matters such as instructions, finance, staff development and community engagement. This solo leadership model is challenged by increasing pressure for high student achievement. The advent of teacher leadership presents teachers as valuable contributors in curriculum matters. Principals’ understanding of teachers as curriculum leaders (TCL) is important if teachers are to provide the much-needed assistance. The current research adopted a multiple-site case study design to explore principals’ understanding of the concept of TCL in schools. Eight participants were purposefully selected; open-ended, semi-structured interview guides were piloted prior to data collection. Observation of school meetings provided additional data. The data were thematically analysed and anchored on Grant’s model of teacher leadership. The findings reveal that, to school principals, TCL means teachers performing the roles of curriculum leaders and managers, decision makers, designers of learning programmes and materials, facilitators, assessors, lifelong learners, models, and pastoral caregivers. The findings further express the frustration of principals on the exclusion of teachers from curriculum decision making at the macro and meso levels. The findings are relevant in the advocacy of distributed leadership as they provide practical reasons for principals to create opportunities for teachers to lead in curriculum matters.

Reference
  • 1. Aquino, C. J. B., & Cuello, R. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs and practices on written corrective feedback: Matched or Mismatched. DLSU Research Congress. https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2020/LLI-01.pdf
    2. Asegu, D. A., & Gedifew, M. T. (2022). Lived experiences of secondary school principals in practicing teacher leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and Management, 8(3), 1-12. http://www.globalscienceresearchjournals.org/
    3. Blose, S., & Khuzwayo, N. Q. (2023). Teacher leadership in action: An inquiry into the lived experiences of subject heads in secondary schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(2), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1808710
    4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. http://www.ceil-conicet.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Creswell-Cap-10.pdf
    5. De Vries, S., van de Grift, W. J., & Jansen, E. P. (2014). How teachers’ beliefs about learning and teaching relate to their continuing professional development. Teachers and Teaching, 20(3), 338-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.848521
    6. Department of Education. (2000). Norms and Standards of Educators. Pretoria: Goverment Gazzette https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/20844.pdf
    7. Department of Education. (2009). Report of the Task Team for the review of the implementation of the National Curriculum Statement. Pretoria: Department of Education. https://www.gov.za/documents/other/report-task-team-review-implementation-national-curriculum-statement-01-oct-2009
    8. Diffey, L., & Aragon, S. (2018). 50-state comparison: Teacher leadership and licensure advancement. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. https://ndlegis.gov/files/committees/66-2019/21_5134_03000appendixc.pdf
    9. Fairman, J. C., & Mackenzie, S. V. (2012). Spheres of teacher leadership action for learning. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.657865
    10. Grant, C. (2008). We did not put our pieces together: Exploring a professional development initiative through a distributed leadership lens. Journal of Education, 44(44), 85-107.
    11. Grant, C. (2012). Daring to lead: The possibility of teacher leadership in KwaZulu-Natal schools. Education Leadership, Management And Governance in South Africa, 163-177. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v30n3a362
    12. Grant, L. (2012). Cross-sector moderation as a means of engaging staff with assessment and teaching pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 10(4), 434-446. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.434
    13. Hamid, H. A., Nasri, N. F., & Ghazali, N. (2018). Colours as a Form of Corrective Feedback in EFL Learners' Writing. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1804-08
    14. Harris, A., Jones, M., & Crick, T. (2020). Curriculum leadership: A critical contributor to school and system improvement. School Leadership & Management,40(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1704470
    15. Hart, A. (2021). Principals’ perceptions and understandings of teacher leadership. Journal of Organizational & Educational Leadership, 7(1), 1. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/joel/vol7/iss1/1/
    16. Kotirde, I. Y., & Yunos, J. B. M. (2014). Teachers’ role in improving teaching and learning in Nigerian secondary schools’ education. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Education, 1, 22-27. https://is.gd/L83Ovm
    17. Liu, P., Xiu, Q., Tang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Understanding teacher leadership identity: The perspectives of Chinese high school teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2006792
    18. Makgato, M., & Ramaligela, S. M. (2012). Teachers' criteria for selecting textbooks for the technology subject. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2012.10740727
    19. Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571
    20. Moorhouse, B. L., & Beaumont, A. M. (2020). Involving parents in their children’s school-based English language writing using digital learning. Relc Journal, 51(2), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219859937
    21. Motlhabane, A., & Dichaba, M. (2013). Andragogical approach to teaching and learning practical work in science: A case of in-service training of teachers. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(3), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2013.11890079
    22. Muijs, D., Chapman, C., & Armstrong, P. (2013). Can early careers teachers be teacher leaders? A study of second-year trainees in the teach first alternative certification programme. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(6), 767-781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213494188
    23. Naidoo, P. (2019). Perceptions of teachers and school management teams of the leadership roles of public school principals. South African Journal of Education, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n2a1534
    24. Nguyen, L. T. T. (2019). A case study of teacher feedback on Thai university students’ essay writing. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1902-08
    25. Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A. (2017). Language teachers' evaluation of curriculum change: A qualitative study. Qualitative Report, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2538
    26. Petrovska, S., & Sivevska, D. (2014). How Macedonian educational context supports leadership role of elementary school teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4098-4102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.897
    27. Polz, E. (2020). Being a teacher–a lifelong learning process. R&E-SOURCE(14). https://journal.ph-noe.ac.at/index.php/resource/article/view/951
    28. Putri, A. A. F., Putri, A. F., Andriningrum, H., Rofiah, S. K., & Gunawan, I. (2019). Teacher function in class: A literature review. 5th international conference on education and technology (ICET 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-19.2019.2
    29. Sekhu, M. S. (2019). Ubuntu and Pastoral Care of Vulnerable Learners in Soshanguve Township Primary Schools University of Pretoria]. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Sekhu%2C+M.+S.+%282019%29.+Ubuntu+and+Pastoral+Care+of+Vulnerable+Learners+in+Soshanguve+Township+Primary+Schools+University+of+Pretoria%5D.+&btnG=
    30. Shahrill, M. (2014). Exploring educational administration: The relationship between leadership and management. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(1), 525. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i1/557
    31. Sharma, M. K., & Jain, S. (2013). Leadership management: Principles, models and theories. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(3), 309-318. https://www.viciongroup.info/assets/files/28.-LeadershipManagement.PrinciplesModelsandTheoriesinglsartculoautorManojKumarSharmayShilpaJain.pdf
    32. Shields, C. (2017). A dialogue between leadership and curriculum theory: A quest for “truth”? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(2), 383-388. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15700763.2017.1298813
    33. Sinha, S., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2017). Development of teacher leadership identity: A multiple case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 356-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.004
    34. Sripai, S., & Wanawan, K. (2018). Latent profile analysis of the good teacher characteristics in the 21st century in the Northeastern Region of Thailand. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(4), 136-143. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2017.3398
    35. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2017.3398
    36. Vuorikari, R., Berlanga, A., Cachia, R., Cao, Y., Fetter, S., Gilleran, A., Klamma, R., Punie, Y., Scimeca, S., & Sloep, P. (2011). ICT-based school collaboration, teachers’ networks and their opportunities for teachers’ professional development-a case study on eTwinning. Advances in Web-Based Learning-ICWL 2011: 10th International Conference, Hong Kong, China, December 8-10, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_12
    37. Zombwe, G. (2008). Who is a Teacher? Quality teachers for Quality education. Tanzania, Dar es Salaam: HakiElimu Position Papers. Retrieved January, 15, 2017. www.tzonline.org/pdf/whoisateacher.pdf