Current issue in national evaluation standard of physical education in Malaysia and the way forward
List of Authors
Ong Yun Er , Zainuddin Z.A
Keyword
issues and weaknesses, physical education, national evaluation standard
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify the current issue in national evaluation standard of Physical Education in Malaysia and the way forward through the experienced physical education teachers from the southern region of peninsular Malaysia. It is also to suggest a set of tests that can be applied to further enhanced the current national evaluation standard to solve the issues that faced by the teachers and students. The study method exercised in this study involving this following data gathering instruments: a survey to 10 experienced physical education teachers from the southern region of peninsular Malaysia by using interview method. Interviews were conducted with key informants to validate the issues that face by the teachers and in need to be solved. The results of the study revealed that the weaknesses and issues of the national evaluation standard of Physical Education can be categorized into 4 major categories which are teachers lack knowledge in conducting the evaluation, insufficient and less maintenance equipment, little concern of physical health among the students and teachers and procedures that are hard to be executed. With issues that identified through the analysis, the results of this study should help to improve the quality and the validity of the national evaluation standard of physical education in Malaysia.
Reference
1. Baechle & Earle, and National Strength & Conditioning Association. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. Human Kinetics Publishers, 2000. Print.
2. Gordana Kević, Klara Šiljeg, Josip Zečić Mrgan,, and Goran Sporiš. "How to measure muscular endurance in children: a new approach." Collegium Antropologicum 37.2 (2013): 385-90. Web.
3. Hashim, Ahmad, and Karim. "National Physical Education Standards: Level of Physical Fitness Female Student Primary School in Malaysia." International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 8.5 (2018): n. pag. Web. <10.30845/ijhss.v8n5a14>.
4. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board, and Committee on Fitness Measures and Health Outcomes in Youth. Fitness Measures and Health Outcomes in Youth. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2012. Print.
5. Mayorga-Vega, Bocanegra-Parrilla, Ornelas, and Viciana. "Criterion-Related Validity of the Distance- and Time-Based Walk/Run Field Tests for Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." PLOS ONE 11.3 (2016): e0151671. Web. <10.1371/journal.pone.0151671>.
6. Ortega, Artero, Ruiz, Vicente-Rodriguez, Bergman, and Castillo. "Reliability of health-related physical fitness tests in European adolescents. The HELENA Study." International Journal of Obesity 32.S5 (2008): S49-S57. Web. <10.1038/ijo.2008.183>.
7. Quinney, Smith, and Wenger. "A field test for the assessment of abdominal muscular endurance in professional ice hockey players." Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 6.1 (1984): 30-33. Web. <10.2519/jospt.1984.6.1.30>.
8. Santosh Kumar, and Surender Singh. Effect Of Physical Education Programme On Students Of Utttar Pradesh: Special reference to the selected Physical and Physiological Parameters. India: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012. Print.
9. Wiersma and Sherman. "The Responsible Use of Youth Fitness Testing to Enhance Student Motivation, Enjoyment, and Performance." Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 12.3 (2008): 167-183. Web. <10.1080/10913670802216148>.
10. Zheng Xiao-feng, Zhang Peng, and Liu Xin-min. "Study on evaluation and policy perfection of the physical fitness test policy of elementary and middle school students in China." China Sport Science 37.2017 (2017): no. 10, 13-20. Web.