Comparison of attitudes towards inclusive education between teachers and students with and without special educational needs
List of Authors
  • Chun Yeung Oscar LO , Hoi Nga Anna NG

Keyword
  • Inclusive education, special educational needs, students, teachers

Abstract
  • Inclusive education (IE) is underpinned by the values of equality, participation, developing and sustaining communities, and respect for diversity. It was asserted that through social participation in ordinary education settings, students with special educational needs (SEN) would benefit in academic performance and psychosocial adjustment. However, students with SEN in IE not only were poor in self-image, but also showed negative social relationships. Research in the West suggested that the efficacy of IE depends partly on the attitudes of teachers and students. This study was conducted to investigate the core value, attitude and sentiments regarding IE among students and teachers in Hong Kong. A questionnaire comprising items on sociodemographic characteristics and measuring instruments was designed for data collection. Participation was voluntarily and anonymous. A total of 107 teachers, 91 students with SEN, and 458 students without SEN in an institute of higher education responded to the online questionnaire survey. The data revealed that teachers and students with and without SEN were generally supportive of the core values of IE. In general, negative sentiments about people with disability were low and attitudes towards IE was positive among the three groups of respondents. Teachers obtained the lowest score on attitudes towards IE, though they were less negative in sentiments about people with disability. Expectedly, students with mild disabilities were considered more suitable for IE than students with more severe disabilities. Regardless of severity of disabilities, intellectual disabilities, mental and emotional problems, and ADHD were more commonly considered not suitable for IE. Ironically, mental and emotional problems and ADHD were the most common disabilities among students with SEN. Implications of the findings were considered.

Reference
  • 1. Alkahtani, M. A. (2016). Review of the literature on children with special educational needs. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35), 70-83.

    2. Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: a review of literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17 (2), 129-147. https://doi. org/10.10 80/08856250210129056

    3. Baker, E. T., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1995). The effects of inclusion in learning. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 33-35.

    4. Bear, G. G., Minke, K. M., & Manning, M. A. (2002). Self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A Meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 405-427. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02796015.2002.12086165

    5. Beacham, N., & Rouse, M. (2011). Student teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about inclusion and inclusive practice. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01194.x

    6. Blankenship, T., Fore, C., & Boon, R. T. (2005). Efficacy and Perception of Inclusion at the Secondary Level for Students with Mild Disabilities: A Review of the Literature, Electronic Journal for IE, 1 (9). https://corescholar.libraries. wright.edu/ejie

    7. Cara, M. (2013). Academic and social outcomes of children with SEN in the general education classroom. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(7), 90-99. https://doi.org/ 10.5901/ jesr.2013.v3n7p90

    8. Changpinit, S., Greaves, D., & Frydenberg, E. (2007). Attitudes, knowledge, concerns, and coping strategies regarding inclusive education in community of Thai educators, The 1st International conference on Educational Reform, Mahasarakham University, Thailand. http://www.icer.msu.ac.th/ICER2007/paper/CI03.pdf

    9. Curran, C. M., & Petersen A. J. (2017). Handbook of Research on Classroom Diversity and Inclusive Education Practice. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2520-2

    10. de Boer, A., & Pijl, S. J. (2016). The acceptance and rejection of peers with ADHD and ASD in general secondary education. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(3), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.958812

    11. Ditchman, N., Werner, S., Kosyluk, K., Jones, N., Elg, B., & Corrigan, P. W. (2013). Stigma and intellectual disability: potential application of mental illness research. Rehabilitation Psychology. 58, 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032466

    12. Elbaum, B. B. (2002). The self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of comparisons across different placements. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(4), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00047

    13. Eubanks, A. D. (2018). Values vs. self-Interest as determinants of attitudes: Through a construal level theory lens, (sometimes) self-Interest wins (Master Thesis). University of Arkansas. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/3113F

    14. Forber-Pratt, A. J., Lyew, D., Mueller, C., and Samples, L. B. (2017). Disability identity development: a systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology. 62, 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000134

    15. Forlin, C., Fogarty, G., Carroll, A. (1999). Validation of the factor structure of the interactions with disabled person’s scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0004 9539908255334

    16. Gething, L., & Wheeler, B. (1992). The Interaction with Disabled Persons scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539208260146

    17. Heward, W. L. (2009). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (9th ed.). Pearson.

    18. Iacono, T., Tray, J., Keating, J., & Brown, T. (2009). The Interaction with Disabled Persons scale: Revisiting its internal consistency and factor structure, and examining item-level properties. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(6), 1490-1501. https://doi.org/10.10 16/j.ridd.2009.07.010

    19. Li, K. M., & Cheung, R. Y. M. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy in implementing inclusive education in Hong Kong: The roles of attitudes, sentiments, and concerns. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 68(2), 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1678743

    20. Lindsay, G. (2007). Educational psychology and the effectiveness of IE/ mainstreaming. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1348/00 0709906X156881

    21. MacLean, D., & Gannon, P. M. (1995). Measuring attitudes toward disability: The interaction with Disabled Persons Scale revisited. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(4), 791-806.

    22. Markova, M., Pit-Ten Cate, I., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2016). Preservice teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion and toward students with special educational needs from different ethnic backgrounds. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(3), 554-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1055317

    23. McCoy, S., & Banks, J. (2011). Simply academic? Why children with special educational needs don’t like school. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(1), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2011.640487

    24. Moore, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest. Social Justice Research, 17 (2), 189-202. https://doi.org/ 10.1023/B: SORE.0000027409.88372.b4

    25. Moore, M. E., Konrad, A. M., Yang, Y., Ng, E. S. W., and Doherty, A, J. (2011). The vocational well-being of workers with childhood onset of disability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 681–689. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jvb. 2011.03.019

    26. Ng, H. N., Boey, K. W., & Kwan, C, W. (2022). Reliability and validity of measuring instruments of inclusive practice in higher education. 2nd International Virtual Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology (23 July, 2022). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    27. Pijl, S. L. (2005). Interventions for social integration: Training of social skills for students with disabilities in regular education In B. F. van der Meulen, C. Vlaskamp, & K. C. van den Bos (Eds.), Intervention in special needs education (pp. 122-135). Lemniscaat B. V.

    28. Rea, P. J., McLaughlin, V. L., & Walther-Thomas, C. (2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Exceptional Children, 68, 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290206800204

    29. Rustemier, S. (2002). Social and educational justice: The human rights framework for inclusion. Centre for Studies on IE

    30. Schumm, J. S., Moody, S. W., & Vaughn, S. (2000). Grouping for reading instruction: Does one size fit all? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 477-488.

    31. Schwab, S. (2015) Social dimensions of inclusion in education of 4th and 7th grade pupils in inclusive and regular classes: Outcomes from Austria. Research in Developmental Disabilities 43-44: 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.06.005

    32. Sin, K. F., Forlin, C., Ho, F. C., Au, M. L., Yan, Z., & Lui, M. (2012). Equal learning opportunities for students with disabilities under the integrated education system. Centre for Special Education needs and IE, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong.

    33. Skrzypiec, G., Askell-Williams, H., Slee, P., & RudzinskiI, A. (2016). Students with self-identified special educational needs and disabilities (si-SEND): Flourishing or languishing. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349 12X. 2015.1111301

    34. Tait, K., & Purdie, N. (2000). Attitudes toward disability: Teacher education for inclusive environments in an Australian University. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/103491200116110

    35. United Nations (2007). From exclusion to equality: Realizing the rights of persons with disabilities. Geneva: UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

    36. Watkin A., & Donnelly, C. (2014). Core values as the basis for teacher education for inclusion. Global Education Review, 1(1), 76-92.

    37. Wong-Ratcliff, M., & Ho, K. K. (2011). Can integrated education meet the needs of students with SEN? New Horizons in Education, 59(2), 101-115.

    38. Zeleke, S. (2004). Self-concepts of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers: A critical review.” European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19 (2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250410001678469