The corporate social responsibility practices of selected higher educational institutions in Bohol, Philippines
List of Authors
  • Ace P. Uy , Precillano E. Echavia , Teresa H. Inot

Keyword
  • Corporate Social Responsibility, Higher Educational Institutions, Economic, Legal, Ethical and Philanthropic responsibilities, Integrated Solid Waste Management

Abstract
  • Corporate Social Responsibility can be viewed as an application of the four corporate social responsibilities; economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic, as well as the transparent management of an organization. There has been a rise in the awareness and pressures concerning Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in colleges and universities. This study assessed the extent to which CSR practices of selected higher educational institutions (HEIs) in Bohol, Philippines are manifested in terms of the knowledge, perception and attitude of employees. It is also directed to determine whether or not a significant relationship existed in the assessments made by the respondents when grouped according to employment category and school affiliation. The results of the study revealed that the extent to which CSR practices of the chosen schools in terms of the knowledge, perception and attitudes of employees composed of academic administrators, faculty and rank and file were manifested to a very great extent, in the same manner as to how the selected HEIs addressed the implementation of economic, legal, ethical and social responsibilities. Moreover, there were also significant differences being observed in the assessments made when respondents were grouped according to employment category and school affiliation. These institutions differ in their implementation of CSR programs designed to enhance their image and reputation, and boost the trust and support of the public. The study recommended to the administration and management of the selected higher educational institutions that the proposed Integrated Solid Waste Management Program be adopted and must be committed towards environmental quality and sound ecological operations.

Reference
  • Journals 1. Bondy, K.et.al ( 2012) An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility In Multi- National Corporations: Form and Implications 1-19 2. Brown, J and Forster, W.(2013) CSR and Stakeholder’s Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 301-312 3. Carroll, A. & Buchholtz, A. (2014) Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability and Stakeholder’s Management 4. Colby,T. (2010) Corporate Social Responsibility In Higher Education 17-21 5. Dahan, G. & Senol, I (2012a) Corporate Social Responsbility in Higher Education Institutions: Istanbul Bilgi University Case: American Journal of Contemporary Research 6. Dill, K. & Thomas (2002) The Companies with the Best CSR Reputations 8-10 7. Fitzpatrick, J.(2013) Business Students’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsbility: College Students Journal 86- 92 8. Freeman, R.E.(2014) The Politics of Stakeholder’s Theory: Some Future Directions, Northhamton Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 9. Grigore, G.F. (2010) Corporate Social Responsibility and Digital Communities 51-78 10. Grayson & Hodges (2002) Impact of the Brand Image and Loss of Talent: Sao Paulo, Brazil. 11. Kotler & Lee (2005) Corporate Social Responsbility: Doing the Most for your Employees. 12. Luansing, B. & Muya G. (2016) Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding CSR in Private HEIs in Region IV-A, Philippines 4-7 13. Medallon, L. (2014) Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility in Private Schools 7-11 14. Melewar & Akel (2005) The Role of Corporate Identity In Higher Education 41, 57 15. Nolan, J. (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility: Respect of Human Rights 565-567 16. Porter, M & Kramer, M. (2012) The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy: Harvard Business School 17. Reeves, C. (2014) Social Responsibility and Public Relations 42-46 18. Roa, F. (2011) Business Ethics and Social Responsibility 234-242 19. Robinsons, S. (2014) Judicial Review Under OECD, State Responsbility 10-13 20. Rosnan, H., Salhani, S & Yusof N.(2018) Attitudes Towards Corporate Social Responsbility among Budding Leaders: Procedia- Social and Behavioral 21. Sanchez, I. ( 2016) Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 73-75 22. Stadler, A. (2017) Professors’ Perception with respect to HEIs Social Responsbility Initiatives 2-7 23. Taneja, S. & Gupta, R. (2014) Researches in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Shifting Focus, Paradigms and Methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics. 24. Zheng,D. (2011) The Impact of Employees’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsbility on Job Attitudes and Behaviors: A Study in China 183-185 Electronic Sources 1. CHED Strategic plan for 2011-2016. Retrieved from http://www.ched.gov.ph/wpcontent/ uploads /2014/12/ CHED- Strategic Plan. Accessed 08.18.20