Analyzing language features of construction contracts from the multi-dimensional perspective
List of Authors
  • Noor Mala Ibrahim , Yuzhu, Bian

Keyword
  • Language features, construction contract, multi-dimensional approach, lexico-grammatical features, general genre features

Abstract
  • In recent years, China’s active participation in the international construction market has led to a greater demand for the comprehensive demystification of construction contracts from the language perspective. Nevertheless, scarcity can be felt concerning that perspective. This study aims to explore language features via the multi-dimensional approach proposed by Biber. A corpus-driven method was adopted on the basis of five real construction contracts. The salient language features were uncovered statistically by adopting the Multi-dimensional Analysis Tagger (MAT), and a series of visualized results displaying lexico-grammatical features and general genre features of construction contracts from different dimensions were also output. The results revealed that nouns and normalization were densely employed in construction contracts. Meanwhile, language variables like phrasal coordination, predicative modals, passive voice, and suasive verbs were excessively employed. The results also uncovered that adverbs and be as the main verb were counted as underused. As to the general genre features, the results suggested that the contracts were written documents with informational, non-narrative, context-independent, self-assertive, and abstract features. Those features stem from the communicative purposes of construction contracts, rendering construction contracts the formal style, explicit communicative purposes, objective stance, and authoritative position. Though with limited language features, we can still obtain an insight into the interpretation and teaching of construction contracts.

Reference
  • 1. Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
    2. Bhatia, V. (2008). Genre analysis, esp, and professional practice. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.005
    3. Bhatia, V. (2017). Critical genre analysis: Investigating interdiscursive performance in professional practice. Routledge.
    4. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.
    5. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press.
    6. Carlo, G. (2015). Diachronic and synchronic aspects of legal English. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    7. Cheng, H. (2009). A stylistic analysis of English contracts for international engineering projects. [Master thesis, Taiyuan University of Technology].
    8. Elkhayat, Y., & Marzouk, M. (2022). Selecting feasible standard forms of construction contracts using text analysis. Advanced Engineering Informatics,52,101569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101569
    9. Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, M. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Oxford University Press Inc.
    10. Heidari Kaidan, Z., Jalilifar, A., & Don, A. (2021). On the significance of disciplinary variation in research articles: Perspectives from nominalization. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1890872. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1890872
    11. Li, S., He, B., & Kong, J. (2020). Legal risk of the construction contract. China Architecture Publishing & Media co., Ltd.
    12. Liu, C. (2018). A contrastive study of generic intertextuality on the disputes over the South China Sea between Chinese and American media — Take people’s daily and New York Times, for example. [Master thesis, Nanjing Normal University].
    13. Liu, J. (2008). Analysis of FIDIC contract features in terms of functional stylistics. [Master thesis, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics].
    14. Lv, W. (2015). International project contract management. Chemical Industry Press.
    15. Mc Namara, A., & Sepasgozar, M. (2021). Intelligent contract adoption in the construction industry: Concept development. Automation in construction, 122, 103452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103452
    16. Mouritsen, S. C. (2019). Contract interpretation with corpus linguistics. Washington Law Review, 94(1337), 1337-1418. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3065239
    17. Mu, C. (2021). A multidimensional contrastive analysis of linguistic features between international and local biology journal english research articles. Scientometrics, 126(9), 7901–7916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04102-x
    18. Murdoch, J. R., & Hughes, W. (2008). Construction contracts: Law and management (4th ed.). Taylor & Francis.
    19. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2022). Statistical bulletin of the People's Republic of China in 2021. National Bureau of Statistics of China.
    20. Ning, X., & Wu, W. (2019). English for project management. China Machine Press.
    21. Nini, A. (2019). The multi-dimensional analysis tagger. In T. Berber Sardinha, & M. Veirano Pinto, (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, 67-94. Bloomsbury Academic.
    22. Orts, M. Á. (2015). Power and complexity in legal genres: Unveiling insurance policies and arbitration rules. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 28(3), 485–505. http:// doi.org/10.1007/s11196-015-9429-6
    23. Padhy, J., Jagannathan, M., & Kumar Delhi, V. S. (2021). Application of natural language processing to automatically identify exculpatory clauses in construction contracts. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 13(4), 04521035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.00005
    24. Qi, Y. (2004). Contract and contract English. Zhengjiang University Press.
    25. Rasmussen, K., & Engberg, J. (2017). Genre analysis of legal discourse. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 12(22), 113. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v12i22.25497
    26. Song, Q. (2020). A Study of the stylistic functions of grammatical metaphors in business english contracts and business english letters from a systemic functional perspective. [Master thesis, Northeast Normal University].
    27. Sweet, J., Schneier, M., & Wentz, B. (2015). Construction law for design professionals, construction managers, and contractors. Cengage Learning.
    28. Tessuto, G. (2012). Investigating English legal genres in academic and professional contexts. Cambridge Scholars.
    29. Wang, J., & Yang, G. (2016). Contracts for construction projects. Lawpress, China.
    30. Wang, M., & Li, W. (2016). English for international engineering management practice. China Communications Press Co., Ltd.