Remedial teachers’ needs for developing new basic numeracy teaching aids: a needs analysis
List of Authors
  • Low Weng Sheng , Mohd Mokhtar Tahar

Keyword
  • Basic numeracy, Mathematics, needs analysis, remedial teachers, teaching aids

Abstract
  • Appropriate teaching aids can assist remedial pupils in mastering basic numeracy skills effectively. However, issues persist of remedial pupils struggling to grasp basic numeracy skills, potentially due to the lack of suitable teaching aids tailored for Malaysia’s Special Remedial Programme. Thus, this quantitative study aimed to identify remedial teachers' needs for developing new basic numeracy teaching aids in the Special Remedial Programme. This study adapted McKillip's Discrepancy Model to guide the needs analysis. A quantitative survey methodology was used with 143 remedial teachers respondents in Melaka state, Malaysia. A validated questionnaire measured the levels and discrepancies in remedial teachers’ utilisation, perceptions, constraints, and skills regarding proposed basic numeracy teaching aids by the Ministry of Education Malaysia. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Findings showed moderate utilisation, high positive perception, moderate constraints, and high skills levels in using existing basic numeracy teaching aids. Discrepancies were identified in each construct, indicating the need for improvements tailored for better remedial learning. The results suggest modifying and developing new basic numeracy teaching aids that meet remedial pupils’ learning characteristics, fostering their creative thinking, facilitating self-directed learning activities, improving time efficiency in teaching and learning mathematics, providing various customisable teaching aid templates that are easy to reproduce with affordable everyday materials, and developing user-friendly technology teaching aids. Addressing these needs can enhance remedial teaching practices and pupils’ numeracy achievement. This study provides an important initial evidence base for designing and developing appropriate basic numeracy teaching aids based on remedial teachers’ current needs.

Reference
  • 1. Abd Samad, N., Wan Ahmad, W. M. R., Harun, H., Amiruddin M. H., Hashim, S., & Ja’apar, F. (2018). Bahan bantu mengajar (BBM) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran (P&P) di sekolah menengah kebangsaan (SMK) daerah Pontian. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/4808
    2. Ahamad, S. Z. & Abdul Mutalib, A. (2015). Preliminary study: An investigation on learning assistance requirement among low achievers in primary schools. International Journal of Computer Application, 114(2), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.5120/19954-1783
    3. Ahmad Zanzali, N. A. & Daud, N. (2010). Penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar di kalangan guru pelatih UTM yang mengajar matapelajaran matematik. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10261/
    4. Avdiu, E., Bekteshi, E., & Xhaferi, B. (2022). Game-based learning in inclusive classrooms: A case study in Upper Austria. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 14(1), 762-770. http://doi.org/10.9756/INT-JECSE/V14I1.221089
    5. Bird, R. (2017). The dyscalculia toolkit: Supporting learning difficulties in maths (3rd ed.). Sage.
    6. Chang, R.-C. & Yang, C.-Y. (2016). Developing a mobile app for game-based learning in middle school mathematics course. Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Applied System Innovation, 1- 2. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICASI.2016.7539807
    7. Chen, M.-S., Wang, C.-T., & Wang, C.-N. (2011). Effect of mental abacus training on working memory for children. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 28(6), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10170669.2011.610365
    8. Chen, C.-L. & Wu, C.-C. (2020). Students’ behavioral intention to use and achievements in ICT-integrated mathematics remedial instruction: Case study of a calculus course. Computers & Education, 145, 103740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103740
    9. Chu, H.-C., Chen, J.-M., Kuo, F.-R., & Yang, S.-M. (2021). Development of an adaptive game-based diagnostic and remedial learning system based on the concept-effect model for improving learning achievements in mathematics. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 36-53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48629243
    10. Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah statistik penyelidikan. Buku satu: Kaedah penyelidikan [Research statistical methods. Book one: Research methods]. McGraw-Hill.
    11. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
    12. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). Sustainable development goals (SDG) indicators Malaysia 2019. https://www.dosm.gov.my/
    13. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
    14. Flores, M. M., Hinton, V. M. & Meyer, J. M. (2020). Teaching fraction concepts using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518795477
    15. Hamdan, A. R., Sihes, A. J., Ramli, J., & Ismail. M. (2006). Tahap minat, pengetahuan dan kemahiran, latihan guru dan beban tugas guru program pemulihan khas sekolah kebangsaan daerah Pontian, Johor. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Teacher Education, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
    16. Ibrahim, N., Seman, A. A., Wahab, N. A., Osman, A., Ilyas, S. S. M., & Saini, N. I. S. M. (2022). ARML: Augmented reality mathematics learning for remedial students. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Intelligent System (ICE3IS), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE3IS56585.2022.10009946
    17. Idris, N. (2011). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan [Research in education]. McGraw-Hill.
    18. Kamis, A., Bakar, A. R., Hamzah, R., & Asmiran. S. (2012). The validity and reliability of the fashion design competency instrument. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 37(2), 11-19.
    19. Kasran, S. B., Toran, H., & Md Amin, A. (2012). Issues and trend in remedial education: What the teachers say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1579-1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.869
    20. Keller, T., Hebeisen, A., & Brucker-Kley, E. (2018). Integration of children with special needs in mathematics through virtual reality. In D. G. Sampson, D. Ifenthaler, & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA), 30-37. IADIS.
    21. Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
    22. Mazeyanti, M. A., Fiqa Azureen, A. H., & Savit, S. (2018). The features of mobile app design model from dyscalculia children personal factor. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Technology and Operations Management (2NDCTOM), 46-58.
    23. McKillip, J. (1987). Need analysis: Tools for the human service and education. Sage.
    24. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 [Malaysia education development plan 2013-2025].
    25. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2019). Pelaporan pentaksiran sekolah rendah 2019 [2019 Primary school assessment report]. https://www.moe.gov.my/muat-turun/laporan-dan-statistik/lp/3056-pelaporan-pentaksiran-sekolah-rendah-2019/file
    26. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2021). Panduan umum pemugaran literasi dan numerasi 2021 [General literacy and numeracy empowerment guide 2021]. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
    27. Mohamed Yahya, N. L. (2002). Sistem penjanaan soal selidik secara atas talian (SPSSAT) [Online questionnaire generation system (SPSSAT)] [Unpublished degree dissertation]. Universiti Malaya.
    28. Mohd Yasin, M. H. & Atin, S. A. (2021). 21st century education implementation level among remedial teacher in Sarawak. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(1), 655-665.
    29. Mohd Yasin, M. H., Toran, H., Tahar, M. M., Abd. Hamid, S., Nik Abd Rahman, N. A., Zahari, Z., Jantan, A., Abu Bakar, Z., & Nordin, A. (2007). Penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar dalam pengajaran murid-murid pemulihan khas. Proceedings of the Conference Majlis Guru Pendidikan Khas, Johor Bharu.
    30. Mustafa, D., Mustafa, I. G., Zriqat, S., & Althebyan, Q. (2023). MIRNA: Adaptive 3D game to assist children's distance learning difficulties; Design and teachers' intention to use. International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 20(3A), 527-535. https://doi.org/10.34028/iajit/20/3A/10
    31. Omar, M. S., Saad, N. S., & Dollah, M. U. (2017). The use of teaching aids primary school mathematics teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 7(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol7.no1.3.2017
    32. Ong, L. C. & Amir, R. (2019). Keberkesanan strategi pengajaran VAK dalam kalangan murid pemulihan khas. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business, Humanities and Education (ICBHE 2019), 1–11.
    33. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). McGraw- Hill.
    34. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on research methods is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 30, 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
    35. Rusiman, M. S., Mohamad, M., Che Him, N., Kamardan, M.G., Othman, S., Shamsuddin, M. K., Samah, M., & Aziz, N. (2017). The use of concrete material in teaching and learning mathematics. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(8), 2170-2174.
    36. Sani, N. (2014). Pelaksanaan program literasi dan numerasi (LINUS): Satu analisis [Implementation of the literacy and numeracy program (LINUS): An analysis] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Malaya.
    37. Somasundram, P., Syed Zamri, S. N. A., & Leong, K. E. (2018). Year five pupils’ understanding of relationship between addition and subtraction. Journal of Research in Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.123
    38. Special Education Curriculum Development Centre. (2008). Pendidikan di Malaysia [Education in Malaysia]. Ministry of Education Malaysia.
    39. Special Education Division. (2019). Buku panduan pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik Program Pemulihan Khas [Teaching and learning mathematics guidebook for Special Remedial Programme]. Ministry of Education Malaysia.
    40. Special Needs Education Department. (2012). Garis panduan pelaksanaan Program Pemulihan Khas [Implementation guidelines for Special Remedial Programme]. Ministry of Education Malaysia.
    41. Sugiman, Suyitno A., & Pujiastuti. (2021). Improving absorption of students with special needs by the use of mathematical multi-purpose videos. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918, 04035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042035
    42. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_MYS.pdf
    43. Ungang, C. A. (2008). Penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar dalam kemahiran asas membaca di kelas pemulihan: Kajian kes di lima buah sekolah daerah Serian. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL, 8, 84-97.
    44. Wong, W. S. & Osman, K. (2018). Pembelajaran berasaskan permainan dalam pendidikan STEM dan penguasaan kemahiran abad ke-21. Politeknik & Kolej Komuniti Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 121-135.
    45. Yoong, S. M. & Ahmad, N. A. (2021) Characteristics of dyscalculia in mathematics learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 14(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol14.1.2.2021.
    46. Zientek, L.R., Lane, F.C., Sechelski, A. & Shupp, S. (2020). Effects of delaying college-level mathematics course enrollment for remedial students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025120923113.
    47. Zulnaidi, H. & Syed Zamri, S. N. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the GeoGebra software: The intermediary role of procedural knowledge on students’ conceptual knowledge and their achievement in Mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2155- 2180. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01219a.